Evaluate an Argument - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The author advises that whenever anyone is doing research, he or she ought to be cautious of Wikipedia. Several justifications have…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
Evaluate an Argument
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Evaluate an Argument"

Evaluation of an Argument “What is wrong with Wikipedia” The article under consideration is a publication of Harvard writing program whereby the contentious issue is about what is wrong with Wikipedia. The author advises that whenever anyone is doing research, he or she ought to be cautious of Wikipedia. Several justifications have been used in the article to ascertain the claim. One is that, as per the disclaimer, contributors are anonymous people who may desire to post, and that their contributors’ expertise is not considered add wikis on Wikipedia (, n.d.). The second premise is that the information on the site is outdated, or information may be from someone who wants to mislead others. The author further states that the information may be true but, but since the experts do not review the site’s access; there is a substantial peril in relying on this resource for your academic works (, n.d.). As with the conclusion of the argument, the author clamps the whole argument against the use of Wikipedia and suggests that Wikipedia is good for use for some functions. For instance, they can be used for becoming accustomed or background information of what one is researching (, n.d.).
For the validation of the argument to hold, it means that all of their premises that support the argument are all true and the conclusion must ultimately be true. The argument in this article is valid because the premises are well linked to the conclusion. In terms of soundness, the argument is not sound even if it is deductive and logically valid; it has some mythical arguments that habitually make it unsound. When viewed from an inductive perspective, which holds on the basis of probability, that if the premises given are true then conclusion is most likely to be true. The inductive argument employed here is strong- it holds on the assumption that the conclusion of X is probably true if the premises of X are true.
The deductive is valid as per the author’s premises for a number of reasons, which include; the contributors are not expertise and are anonymous and, therefore, their credibility is questionable; the information or articles on the website are out-of-date and may be posted by someone who wants to just mislead the audience; and because the administrators do not review the site’s access. Based on these validations, it clear that the deductive argument is true and valid since its conclusion sustains all the premises stated therein. However, the deductive argument in the article is not sound because of the following. Several inquiries of examinations have been done to contrast Wikipedia with other related information community sites, and often Wikipedia has scored high than the likes of Britannica, Enciclonet and so forth indicating that its reliability is above average (Carthay, 2013). As with concerns that the information is outdated, as explained by Mr. Wales-the founder, the information is updated from time to time and information about revisions is obtained by clicking at to corner for history. He further notes that there is a well-built community about 1444 administrators who keep on monitoring and vetting to validate posted articles, and therefore alleviating claims of anonymity (Carthay, 2013).
When analyzed from, an inductive perspective, the inductive argument is valid. The author employed one flaw to show that Wikipedia is not credible. He used a case point, which happened four years ago as posted by a student who wanted to expose Wikipedia incredibility. The student posted a disguise of himself as the mayor of a town in China, and four years after the posting, a search on the major search directories with the disguised name of the student reveals the same till today (, n.d.). This is absolutely a strong inductive argument whereby the author has invoked some evidence to support the premises. The whole idea of such an inductive argumentative proposition is to show that if such flaw is existent, then probably all the information or many of the wikis posted daily on Wikipedia are not reliable.
Carthay. (2013). “Is Wikipedia a reliable source?” « Division of Libraries Blog. Retrieved 19 November 2014, from Whats Wrong with Wikipedia? § Harvard Guide to Using Sources. Retrieved 19 November 2014, from Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Evaluate an Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Evaluate an Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1)
“Evaluate an Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Evaluate an Argument

Critically evaluate the argument that diversity management is good for organizations, but damaging for employees

...? Diversity Management is good for Organizations but Damaging for Employees al affiliation Diversity management is good for organization Diversity may refer to any difference existing among people in regard to race, age, religion, profession, function specially, lifestyle, sexual orientation and geographic origin. Diversity management means organizing all factors providing for and promoting the progressing development of diverse workforce. This is by melding the perceived differences among employees so as to attain maximum productivity. Diversity management in an organization encompasses the formation of a supportive culture where all workers are effective. In forming this culture it is vital for the management to involve... Diversity...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Visual Argument

...“just do it” is shown. Judging from the first instance of seeing this visual argument, the researcher of this paper thinks that Nike is supposedly advocating freedom to do what you want, breaking barriers and conquering limits (especially when buying Nike products), which is in this case invoked by the freedom of the boy peeing on a wall. This argument would be analyzed further in the next part of the paper. In order to evaluate carefully the visual argument of Nike’s ad, the researcher would try to use the three rhetorical appeals: ethos (credibility), logos (logical reasoning and evidence), and as well as pathos (emotional appeal). In this case, the visual...
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper

Evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia

.... To this effect, much of their findings will be subjected towards what they already know in this field, such that their new work appears to marchnew observations to old facts and while improving them to come up with new theories. This process shows high levels of falsification in science, where scientists will do anything to defend their theories and ensure that they fit in with significant facts to avoid dismissal (Feyerabend 2000).With these and other arguments, Feyerabend uses philosophical facts and methods to show reasons why the society should be defended from science. This paper evaluates Feyerabend’s argument that the society should be protected from science, and the degree to...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Compare the stories in The Thirteen Problems with any of Agatha Christie's later Miss Marple stories (or novels) from the 1950s

6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Critically examine the argument that organizations are gendered and evaluate different strategies for achieving gender equality

...are frequently given assignments that are excluded from social and professional networking concluded that women reported greater career barriers and greater importance of performing well on the job than did men using matched samples of male and female executives. These negative ideas unfortunately lead some women to question their own supervisory abilities, to evaluate themselves harshly on performance appraisals, and to set low performance expectations. They experience more motivational problems and career uncertainties compared to men, and this could be attributed to their negative work experiences (Valentine, 2001). On the other hand, men perceived their abilities, contributions and successes higher than they rate...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Evaluate the argument that global crime has grown significantly over the last two decades, and outline any impact of globalisation process

...and the Philippines. The collapse of the Soviet Union opened up a pool of millions of women from which traffickers can recruit. Now, former Soviet republics, such as Ukraine, Belarus, Latvia and Russia, have become major sending countries for women trafficked into sex industries all over the world. In the sex industry markets today, the most popular and valuable women are from Ukraine and Russia.7 As we see above, the trade in women is essentially at its core an economic argument and it remains motivated in large part through capitalist economics. Similar to slavery, in which profit were the underlying motivations for the international traffic of people, the sexual servitude of women remains one of the most...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Evaluate an argument from the Bouwsma reading

...Evaluate an Argument from the Bouwsma Reading The first argument s that if we are deceived about the world around us, either we are able to detect the deception through the five senses, or we are not able to detect the deception through the five senses. Bouwsma argues that the evil genius may deceive us quite well, but if are cautious, he cannot deceive us. This means that the evil genius can only deceive us when are not wary of the world around us. Thus, if we are able to detect deception through the five senses, we are not deceived about the world around us, but if we are not able to detect the deception through the five senses, then we are deceived about the world around us....
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Montaigne's argument of conflicting appearances and ). Reconstruct and critically evaluate the reasoning of the three competing views (Heraclitus/Pythagoras, Democritus, Pyrrhonians)

...Montaigne’s Argument of Conflicting Appearances, Reconstruction and Critical Evaluation of Three Competing Views Table of Contents Three Competing Views to Montaigne’s Argument from Conflicting Appearances 3 Works Cited 6 Three Competing Views to Montaigne’s Argument from Conflicting Appearances Montaigne cites the metaphysics of the Pyrrhonians, for whom the spiritual goal is to resist the deception of the senses, similar in sentiment to the admonition from Pythagoras about not being strayed by the appearances of things, which can arouse one’s desire for those things of the senses: “Let nothing rouse your wonder and desire, my friend/For that is just about the only way...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Evaluate an Argument

... Section/# Debate/ Argument Analysis Although it is oftentimes tempting to analyze a debate between two individuals and determine which arguments are presented and how logical and sound they are based upon who might have won a particular debate, the case that will be analyzed within this brief paper is one in which this student believes both individuals presented severe logical shortcomings in terms of their argument they sought to present. Accordingly, the debate that was chosen was one that took place in 2004 between then Sen. Obama and Alan Keyes. The debate begins by the moderator asking Sen. Obama whether or not she believes that marriage should be between a man and a woman. In true politician form, Obama dodges the question... ;...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Explain and evaluate Bebe's teleological argument for the existence of God

...sensitive spot, which was his starting point, worked. The above failures of Darwinism made Michael Behe have an excellent reason to decline the science of 19th century as not progressive. He further argued that no question about the underlying mechanism of life be answered by that time. Such questions are: how does photosynthesis work, how do animal muscle move and how energy is extracted from food? The questions were unanswerable. Evaluation for Michael Behe Argument for the existence of God Basing on my evaluation, I strongly support the existence of God who is an intelligent designer, his point of reasoning is full of proves and despite being a great scientist he declined Darwinism...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Evaluate an Argument for FREE!

Contact Us