StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Evaluate an Argument - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The author advises that whenever anyone is doing research, he or she ought to be cautious of Wikipedia. Several justifications have…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.9% of users find it useful
Evaluate an Argument
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Evaluate an Argument"

Evaluation of an Argument “What is wrong with Wikipedia” The article under consideration is a publication of Harvard writing program whereby the contentious issue is about what is wrong with Wikipedia. The author advises that whenever anyone is doing research, he or she ought to be cautious of Wikipedia. Several justifications have been used in the article to ascertain the claim. One is that, as per the disclaimer, contributors are anonymous people who may desire to post, and that their contributors’ expertise is not considered add wikis on Wikipedia (Isites.harvard.edu, n.d.). The second premise is that the information on the site is outdated, or information may be from someone who wants to mislead others. The author further states that the information may be true but, but since the experts do not review the site’s access; there is a substantial peril in relying on this resource for your academic works (Isites.harvard.edu, n.d.). As with the conclusion of the argument, the author clamps the whole argument against the use of Wikipedia and suggests that Wikipedia is good for use for some functions. For instance, they can be used for becoming accustomed or background information of what one is researching (Isites.harvard.edu, n.d.).
For the validation of the argument to hold, it means that all of their premises that support the argument are all true and the conclusion must ultimately be true. The argument in this article is valid because the premises are well linked to the conclusion. In terms of soundness, the argument is not sound even if it is deductive and logically valid; it has some mythical arguments that habitually make it unsound. When viewed from an inductive perspective, which holds on the basis of probability, that if the premises given are true then conclusion is most likely to be true. The inductive argument employed here is strong- it holds on the assumption that the conclusion of X is probably true if the premises of X are true.
The deductive is valid as per the author’s premises for a number of reasons, which include; the contributors are not expertise and are anonymous and, therefore, their credibility is questionable; the information or articles on the website are out-of-date and may be posted by someone who wants to just mislead the audience; and because the administrators do not review the site’s access. Based on these validations, it clear that the deductive argument is true and valid since its conclusion sustains all the premises stated therein. However, the deductive argument in the article is not sound because of the following. Several inquiries of examinations have been done to contrast Wikipedia with other related information community sites, and often Wikipedia has scored high than the likes of Britannica, Enciclonet and so forth indicating that its reliability is above average (Carthay, 2013). As with concerns that the information is outdated, as explained by Mr. Wales-the founder, the information is updated from time to time and information about revisions is obtained by clicking at to corner for history. He further notes that there is a well-built community about 1444 administrators who keep on monitoring and vetting to validate posted articles, and therefore alleviating claims of anonymity (Carthay, 2013).
When analyzed from, an inductive perspective, the inductive argument is valid. The author employed one flaw to show that Wikipedia is not credible. He used a case point, which happened four years ago as posted by a student who wanted to expose Wikipedia incredibility. The student posted a disguise of himself as the mayor of a town in China, and four years after the posting, a search on the major search directories with the disguised name of the student reveals the same till today (Isites.harvard.edu, n.d.). This is absolutely a strong inductive argument whereby the author has invoked some evidence to support the premises. The whole idea of such an inductive argumentative proposition is to show that if such flaw is existent, then probably all the information or many of the wikis posted daily on Wikipedia are not reliable.
References
Carthay. (2013). “Is Wikipedia a reliable source?” « Division of Libraries Blog. Library.blogs.delaware.gov. Retrieved 19 November 2014, from http://library.blogs.delaware.gov/2013/05/05/is-wikipedia-a-reliable-source/
Isites.harvard.edu. Whats Wrong with Wikipedia? § Harvard Guide to Using Sources. Retrieved 19 November 2014, from http://isites.harvard.edu/icb/icb.do?keyword=k70847&pageid=icb.page346376 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Evaluate an Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 1”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1666589-evaluate-an-argument
(Evaluate an Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1)
https://studentshare.org/social-science/1666589-evaluate-an-argument.
“Evaluate an Argument Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 Words - 1”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1666589-evaluate-an-argument.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Evaluate an Argument

Critically evaluate the argument that diversity management is good for organizations, but damaging for employees

...? Diversity Management is good for Organizations but Damaging for Employees al affiliation Diversity management is good for organization Diversity may refer to any difference existing among people in regard to race, age, religion, profession, function specially, lifestyle, sexual orientation and geographic origin. Diversity management means organizing all factors providing for and promoting the progressing development of diverse workforce. This is by melding the perceived differences among employees so as to attain maximum productivity. Diversity management in an organization encompasses the formation of a supportive culture where all workers are effective. In forming this culture it is vital for the management to involve... Diversity...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Evaluate feyerabend's argument that society needs to be defended against science. to what extent does science deserve the specia

In these two books, he expresses and defends his ideas on the nature of scientific methods, concluding that there are no ground rules on governing scientific methods. He opposed the idea of having a single rigid scientific process to which all scientific research is carried out with the argument that this would make science predictable thus denying it the opportunity to evolve (Feyerabend 2000). In this study, Feyerabend shows that new findings in science, on which theories are later founded, have enormous influence from past events, theoriesand facts. Scientists researching in a new area of study do not only apply old scientific methods in fresh observations but they also observe the field under study under the mental influence...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Evaluate and develop an argument for or against the following statement the people process is more important than either the strategy or operations processes

...Why Human Processes in Companies Should be Given Significance Running a company nowadays involves considering different steps and measures and ideasthat work depending on the area of field of expertise. One company can take side on the human processes being a more significant basis in its move and growth. This paper takes into consideration the validity of human processes being more important than operations processes. Systems in today's highly developed world may undeniably be said as efficient. Strategies are made to be more flexible to changes based on different market factors and equipment and technology designs are specially made to aid both customers and the company manage its different needs whether personal or official... Human...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Critically examine the argument that organizations are gendered and evaluate different strategies for achieving gender equality

e established dominance of males in the vast number of areas of public life, women are often placed in a disadvantaged position from the very beginning. Studies have revealed that such gender inequality have grave effects on women’s perceptions of their efficiency and motivation. Some women fall into the trap of giving in to bleak self-fulfilling prophecies that they are not as good as their male co-workers and eventually prove the expectations to be right.
Working women are usually faced with a multitude of challenges. On top of balancing their duties and responsibilities as members of their families, they need to be efficient workers and competitive in their chosen professions.
One main challenge is the issue of provin...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Evaluate the argument that global crime has grown significantly over the last two decades, and outline any impact of globalisation process

These include drugs such cocaine which is harvested in the jungles of Columbia before it makes its way to the cities of London, New York and Paris. In Afghanistan, the poppies of this country are harvested, sent to heroin processing plants in Eastern Europe before they find their home in the veins of Western Europeans and North Americans. In addition to the globalisation of drugs and the internationalisation of narcotics, globalisation has increased the incidents of piracy, counterfeit goods and organ trafficking. Perhaps most insidiously, globalisation has paved the way for an international traffic in people which involves the smuggling of refugees in addition to the international traffic of women. While some women are traffick...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Evaluate an argument from the Bouwsma reading

... Evaluate an Argument from the Bouwsma Reading The first argument s that if we are deceived about the world around us, either we are able to detect the deception through the five senses, or we are not able to detect the deception through the five senses. Bouwsma argues that the evil genius may deceive us quite well, but if are cautious, he cannot deceive us. This means that the evil genius can only deceive us when are not wary of the world around us. Thus, if we are able to detect deception through the five senses, we are not deceived about the world around us, but if we are not able to detect the deception through the five senses, then we are deceived about the world around us. Therefore, this is not a valid argument since the premise...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Montaigne's argument of conflicting appearances and ). Reconstruct and critically evaluate the reasoning of the three competing views (Heraclitus/Pythagoras, Democritus, Pyrrhonians)

...Montaigne’s Argument of Conflicting Appearances, Reconstruction and Critical Evaluation of Three Competing Views Table of Contents Three Competing Views to Montaigne’s Argument from Conflicting Appearances 3 Works Cited 6 Three Competing Views to Montaigne’s Argument from Conflicting Appearances Montaigne cites the metaphysics of the Pyrrhonians, for whom the spiritual goal is to resist the deception of the senses, similar in sentiment to the admonition from Pythagoras about not being strayed by the appearances of things, which can arouse one’s desire for those things of the senses: “Let nothing rouse your wonder and desire, my friend/For that is just about the only way for man/ To find and keep some share of happiness”. That is to say...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Present and evaluate J.C. Maxwells version of the Golden Rule as discussed in class and in your reading. (Again, this means discussing the argument)

... Philosophy, Essay In the Preface, one gets the clincher for what the book, “Theres No Such Thing As "Business" Ethics: Theres Only One Rule For Making Decisions,” by John C. Maxwell stands for. He writes, “Ethics is ethics. If you desire to be ethical, you live it by one standard across the board.” (Preface) People generally live life in compartments. They formulate one set of ethical rules for one segment of life, and another set for the other. People crave for success, even at the cost of outsmarting others. Winning is the goal but it cannot be the be-all and end-all of life and by sacrificing ethics and integrity. What you do is important; but how you do, what you do is more important. Meaning, the process of living... Philosophy, Essay...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Evaluate an Argument

... Section/# Debate/ Argument Analysis Although it is oftentimes tempting to analyze a debate between two individuals and determine which arguments are presented and how logical and sound they are based upon who might have won a particular debate, the case that will be analyzed within this brief paper is one in which this student believes both individuals presented severe logical shortcomings in terms of their argument they sought to present. Accordingly, the debate that was chosen was one that took place in 2004 between then Sen. Obama and Alan Keyes. The debate begins by the moderator asking Sen. Obama whether or not she believes that marriage should be between a man and a woman. In true politician form, Obama dodges the question...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Explain and evaluate Bebe's teleological argument for the existence of God

... sensitive spot, which was his starting point, worked. The above failures of Darwinism made Michael Behe have an excellent reason to decline the science of 19th century as not progressive. He further argued that no question about the underlying mechanism of life be answered by that time. Such questions are: how does photosynthesis work, how do animal muscle move and how energy is extracted from food? The questions were unanswerable. Evaluation for Michael Behe Argument for the existence of God Basing on my evaluation, I strongly support the existence of God who is an intelligent designer, his point of reasoning is full of proves and despite being a great scientist he declined Darwinism to support the reality of the matter in fact. I agree...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Evaluate an Argument for FREE!

Contact Us