Download file to see previous pages...
The work generally aims at describing both Reagan’s and Gorbachev’s views on their personalities, and their contribution to the war. The author recounts their meetings and how the leaders even met in rare circumstances and through personalities such as Ted Kennedy and even George Schultz (Matlock 3-170).
With the Cold War marking an important event in the world’s history, Matlock’s work presents important facts that help understand how the Cold War ended (58-72). Most importantly the work involves the first hand information from Matlock. This essay will provide a detailed summary of the book then critique the work.
From the Matlock’s compilation, it is evident that ending the Cold War was not an easy task. This claim is trustable as Matlock worked as Foreign Service officer and was indicated to have high respect for the Soviet Union. As the coordinator of White House’s policy coordinator on the Soviet Union, the work explains how Gorbachev was a star. Alternatively, it is apparent that Reagan also made valid contributions to the Cold War, as Matlock writes that he asked for a press conference in the late 1980s and confesses on the part he played in the 20th century (3-78). It is also through the work that we see the then President Reagan supporting Gorbachev whom he constantly defined as a great leader in his country. In this context one would actually argue that Regan continually took the lower rank paving way for the appreciation and glory to Gorbachev. It is also questionable in this perspective that the then president was very accommodative to the approaches of the communist country all in an attempt to seek for change from Gorbachev.
As seen in the work, President Reagan’s first term was characterized by denouncements of the Soviet Union which was in his opinion an exceedingly malevolent empire that did not deserve any form
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This is according to author Kevin Bales in his book ‘Understanding global slavery: a reader.’ Bales’ understanding of global slavery is that there should be proper researched issues revolving slavery, when arguing of the virtues and the vices. His main aim being to end slavery, he cites ignorance as the main factor contributing to the issue of slaves.
How can we use Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave as a metaphor for thinking about International Relation today? Plato was the first to establish a theory which was considered to include both the political power and the political leadership legitimization.
In addition to that, it scrutinizes how states and non-state actors compete and co-operate on political issues. Thayer & Ibyramoya (3) asserts that international politics encompasses the study of international relations; which entail the study of associations between countries, roles of nations, non-governmental organizations, and international non-governmental organizations, among others.
Primarily, trade is an exchange of goods and it involves many factors such as policies and trade regulations. The exchange of goods can occur within a country or goods transported into another country—international markets. In the later, we refer to this as international trade.
Needless to say, these ancient Greek philosophers have developed their philosophical thoughts in different time periods. Although one might argue that some elements of these theoretical concepts are obsolete, I attempt to compare some of the elements of the notions of Aristotle and Plato.
However, not all these films portray international relations as convincingly and accurately as the texts we read and study at scholarly journals, international relations textbooks or history books. As rude as it may sound, these films are what one might consider as
Over the years, many countries have strived to undergo globalization in order to develop cultural, political and economic integration. Given that there is high demand of technology across the globe, many ventures have opted to develop their
According to Drezner (2011) the ontology of social constructivism can offer survival of the zombies. Social constructivism assumes the existence of the society is based on the perceptions of humanity. Accordingly, society is shaped by what humanity makes of it (Drezner, 2011).
4 Pages(1000 words)Book Report/Review
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Book Report/Review on topic International Relations for FREE!