Download file to see previous pages...
While proponents support the concept’s ideology, opponents argue against it on the basis of cultural relativism and the apolitical nature of the campaign adopted in its advocacy. Perhaps the most pervasive argument against the universal nature of human rights is that of cultural diversity. This assertion is hinged on the assertion that since every nation or society has its distinctive cultural values, a universal approach to rights cannot be applied all around the world.
A key issue in the cultural disparity argument stems from the perception that the West differs significantly from other nations, on which it attempts to impose the idea of universal human rights. This notion is perpetuated by the fact that the UN Declaration of Human Rights was adopted when majority of Third World nations had not gained independence from the principally Western colonialists. Universality of rights is therefore perceived as cover for the West to intervene in developing countries’ affairs, while spreading its individualistic socio-cultural values in otherwise community-oriented societies. In further argument against universality, others posit that ongoing nation-building in developing countries cannot sustain individual-oriented human rights since it is a communal task.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Article 26 of the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR). The horrors of the two succeeding world wars (I and II) within the span of 30 years only that had dehumanized human civilizations, had shown how dreadful humans can be. Committed never to let such inhumanity happen again, world leaders of the United Nations (UN) had agreed to uphold human rights, which they formalized in what is known today, the UDHR.
He warns that no level of human social or moral achievement that is devoid of some corruption of inordinate self-love. This is irrespective of the extent to which the human mind’s perspectives may reach; the broadness of the loyalties that the human imagination may conceive; the universality of the community that the human statecraft may organize; or even the purity of the saintliest idealists’ aspirations.
The way in which social groups are formed often has an impact on how human rights are determined. Rights, as they are ascribed by skin color, gender, or age, vary within a culture, thus creating a diversity of values from which a human rights theorem is developed.
The influx of Albanian refugees over a decade ago has been quite massive due to the war in Kosovo. However, it seems that not all immigrants are refugees from the war since it has been found out that mostly are from Albania and has taken advantage of the war to seek asylum in the UK and along with it, British passports and citizenship (London Evening Standard 2007).
However, the mass atrocities committed during World War II provided impetus for the recognition of the necessity of promoting and preserving human freedom and rights, which recognition is embodied in international documents such as the Atlantic Charter (1941) and the Teheran Declaration (1942).
Even scholars have defined amour-propre in the aspect of being egocentric while sustaining in the society.
Many social critics have perceived the meaning in a most determined manner that they have forced others as well to believe that Rousseau's claim of 'self-love' aims at making political institutions as tools of oppression and that even so much influenced by the 'materialism' of the society that they have forgotten that what Rousseau meant was the problem of honor that lies at the heart of Rousseau's concerns.
It will then discuss some of the problems with copyright in the digital era. It will also consider the legal application of utilitarian compared to individual rights and consider how both these approaches to rights affects intellectual property rights. This discussion will consider Western intellectual property's traditional personality theory and consider whether utilitarian rights can effectively and sufficiently protect intellectual property rights and copyright in the new digital age.
States have obligated upon themselves these rules and they serve to limit the autonomy of states to do something toward their whole population: married persons and the unmarried, men as well as women, citizen as well as non-citizen,
ple for centuries and in any societies have been dealing in their own way with distress and problems, and respond to them in their own indigenous way and have found a helpful response to their mal de vivre. The rural world in which the majority of the western society lived until
However, despite these frameworks being in place, there have been accusations and counteraccusations with the finger being pointed on the western countries for preaching water and taking wine. The whole
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Universality of Human Rights and Cultural Disparity for FREE!