Download file to see previous pages...
If we have chosen the option A and it has a great number of happy consequences as compare to option B, then the decision will be perfect. That all depends upon the great number of goodness.
The ethical dilemma, which we have given, is a critical one. According to this dilemma, if a ship is sinking and there is only one life boat on the ship. The life boat has the capacity of only ten people but there are thirty people stranded in the sinking ship. The captain has two options for the utility of the life boat. One is to kill twenty people and save the rest of ten people in the life boat. On the other hand, he may let all them to die on a natural death and thus no one would be killed. In this situation, the dilemma is not of great number of goodness rather it can be explained using the lesser number of sorrow, pain or sadness while selecting anyone option.
In this situation, the captain has no choice of having great number of goodness rather he can select only the option where he may have less sorrow over the consequences. If he selects the option of saving ten people on the utility of the life boat then there will be happiness that at least he has saved some people from the danger of death. In this option, he can fully utilize the opportunity of the utility of life boat. However, the dark side of this decision is the killing of more than ten people. This means that if he is saving ten people from death then on the other he is pushing twenty people to towards the death. Here in this situation the number of happiness is less as compare to the number of sorrow or the number of pain. We can say that under the umbrella of utilitarianism, the captain might not go with this decision that he can save ten people while pushing twenty other people to the death.
The captain has another second option to adopt for the people. He may not kill any person in the sinking ship rather they may die their natural death. This means that he does not
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This past week, I was facing a dilemma of whether I should finish my homework or whether I should procrastinate and attend Nuit Blanche. This dilemma made me consider which activity provided me more pleasure and I used this principle of maximizing pleasure to justify my decision.
It is very evident that if they were to follow the Natural Law, the lawyers had to reveal the killing of the other three people immediately as they came to know it. In the Natural Law perspective, the authority of any law or action is justifiable by their reason.
What is utilitarianism?
Brandt and Williams are great philosophers of utiliatarianism. Williams suggested that consequentialism has been popular and perceived to be rational in various societies due to a false impression and refusal of non-consequentialist ideologies.
Capital punishment or Death Penalty is still retained extensively around the world, especially in the Muslim nations and United States. According to the most recent statistics, 58 countries still retain it while 97 have completely abolished it. Human rights organizations and activists all over the world have been protesting against this punishment and are in favor of abolishing it globally.
Smoking Marijuana is an ethical dilemma that often every youth in the society has to come across sometimes in their lives. While smoking Marijuana has well known medical advantages that have been proven through scientific research, it is matter that conflicts with both the legal and the moral standards of a human being.
Every child in the world has a right to live whether they are born out of wedlock or love. Considered as the little angels, they are blessings from above. Every person, every child has to experience life's pleasures, may it be happy or sad. Although each and everyone came from different race, families and country, each has their own right to live in the community.
There are many ethical issues with which society struggles and points to ethical systems as tools that can be used to solve ethical dilemmas. By understanding the rational methods by which ethical issues may be examined, the society is better prepared to cope with complex ethical situations that are likely to arise in the professional working environment.
Utilitarianism is based on the “general happiness principle” or the “principle of utility” (PU). Actions are moral if they promote general happiness, and they are wrong if they will reduce general happiness. Among several actions, the right action promotes
In each of the aforementioned situation, the context in which a particular ethical action followed was very important. In some cases like Engineer Bill’s case, given the cause of the harm, the utilitarian perspective outweighed the deontologist’s perspective within the discussed thresholds and the leverage for the harm that is allowed in both cases.
theory is applicable in situations when a person is faced with a moral dilemma whereby based on the theory the person is able to maximizes the good actions, which in turn maximizes the consequences that are good. The moral uprightness of any action therefore is dependent on the
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Utilitarianism view on a dilemma for FREE!