The Future of Public Administration - Admission/Application Essay Example

Future of Public Administration Future of Public Administration Frederickson, in his text Toward a New Public Administration best describes features of new public administration systems. In his attempt to bring the concept of new public administration, he starts by describing public administration in according to classical political scientists and then adds his perception of public administration. Readers of his book therefore are able to follow what proponents Frederickson adds to his understanding.

The other theorists, for instance, Landau, concentrate in trying to achieve operational efficiency by eliminating redundant and duplicating units of an organization. Their focus on efficiency forgets to incorporate modern aspects of democracy like social wellbeing and equity (Frederickson, 2010). Frederickson describes public administration as the management of public services in an efficient, economical and coordinated manner. This is the classical view where focus was made on the top level units of administration that were involved in management, planning, system analysis and budgeting.

He then incorporated his view of new public administration which now introduced the concept of social equity. Public administration, according to him seeks to answer three questions: how can governments offer more and better services with the available resource? How can government maintain the current level of budgeted spending? And lastly, how can the above objectives be attained while ensuring social equity?Frederickson uses social equity to represent various social aspects in public administration.

According to him, social equity entails various proponents designed to improve the economic wellbeing and political power of the society’s minority groups. New public administration seeks to bring about change to the old forms of governance that were constraints to social equity. The specific propositions brought forward by Frederickson in support of new public administration were: programming-planning-budgeting (PPB) systems, social indicators and executive inventories. Executive inventories were aimed at improving and monitoring the behavior of public officials.

PPB was used to ensure effective control of the uniformed forces. Social indicators could show the level of desired change among the masses (Frederickson, 2010). As discussed above, Landau was only concerned with streamlining public administrations by eliminating the problems of overlapping and duplication caused by redundant units in an organization. Little focus was done on the economical use of resources within the administrative units and also the concerns of the general public were ignored.

Frederickson addressed these issues effectively. He was aware that the society is increasingly becoming involved with public administration. Any leadership that fails to honor public interests was easily outdone through voting or forceful eviction. It is for this reason that Landau’s views are inferior in defining new public administration. Even if the redundant public administration units were scrubbed out, the social problems, due to inequalities, could still exist and the public administration could be rendered ineffective.

The future of public administration is best described by Frederickson. He presents the old views and perspectives and then incorporates the new proponents of public administration. He addresses the various requirements of all stakeholders in public administration, a fact that is not addressed by Martin Landau. In the future, political systems and public administration organization must be centered in the people for it survive. Social equity and minority rights must be addressed effectively as proposed by Frederickson.

ReferencesFrederickson, G. (2010). Toward A New Public Administration. Chonnam National University.In Marini, F. (1971). Toward a new public administration: The Minnowbrook perspective. Scranton: Chandler Pub. Co.