James Kurth's Analysis of Organized Massacres - Essay Example

James Kurth suggests that solutions to such protracted circumstances lie with the effective mobilization of both strategic military and political resources to the situations. He explains that a lot of failures are often attributed to the use of external interventions that do not recognize the nature of issues on the ground.

The best strategy for resolving civil wars is through the effective analysis of the causes and the political and economic demands on both sides. It is also useful to engage in such wars through a carefully selected team of representatives and institutions that both sides may clearly engage and understand. In the event the external forces are deployed, like the U.N. or NATO, their presence in the scene needs to recognize the limits that are acceptable to the parties and they must be accompanied by relevant political agencies. If interventions are defined in terms of human rights like those that the Bush administration did in Iraq and Afghanistan, the percussions might be inconsistent because other nations are already sharply divided on their approach to international law and humanitarian assistance discourses and theory.

James Kurth is very categorical of the imperatives for dialogue and deployment of forces as a solution to civil war. He particularly hails the necessity for effective selection of the forces that can ever intervene in a conflict and their credibility in the estimation of the actual wrangling factions. Suffice it to say, civil war erupts within a historic and economic context that must be yielded if a solution could ever be attained in addressing them conclusively.

2). Using James Kurth's analysis of the impact of the Iraq War, explain the reluctance of the Obama Administration from intervening in the Syrian conflict.
The Syrian situation is one that is unique and involves complex international and diplomatic nexus. Nevertheless, the United States after the war in Iraq and Afghanistan has lost important credibility in its international standing as a superpower. Iraq and Afghanistan have led to a considerable contestation of the basis of America’s international hegemony as a superpower. If America will intervene in Syria, it might take a different form rather than official national deployment of forces. On this basis, the U.S. can supply the Rebels with weapons or technical maneuver advice rather than a full deployment because of the contest among other senior nations like Russia and China that might never take the challenge favorably. It is noteworthy also that the Obama administration is not very particularly keen on the aggressive deployment of forces.

American presidency is a multifaceted institution and volition that goes with certain disparities and cyclic agendum variations. For instance, while republican presidencies have always favoured aggression and war, Democrats tend to engage peaceful engagements with other nations. The Obama administration is caught in the quandary of the matrix of having to minimize American wars while also consolidating the gains of the previous regime. In conclusion, the Syrian conflict is protracted by the already sophisticated nature of parties involved through a clandestine modality and the ghosts of Iraq and Afghanistan interventionism diminish the credibility of the U.S.
Read More