Download file to see previous pages...
This concept of mercy killing has always been a bone of contention in the society. The notion that one is allowed to simply take their or someone else’s life just because they are in pain then the value of life is meaningless. It is believed that if someone is meant to die then they will die if not, then it is our responsibility to ensure that they live for as long as possible. There is a big difference between letting someone die and killing them. Euthanasia gives people the impression that it is okay to relieve yourself of life because the suffering has become too great.
In some cases however, the turnout of some events are beyond our control. Some patients go to hospitals in great pain but they are so willing to die that one can do nothing to help their situation. When a patient, for instance, refuses to take their medication and insist on doing away with all the burdensome medical procedures, they are bound to die. However, the doctors cannot be blamed for mercy killing in this case because the patient was difficult. The doctrine of double effect is another occurrence that is usually above the medical staff control that people confuse with euthanasia (Keown, 23).
When a person is administered to drugs they are meant to help them get better. This is the common knowledge of how hospitals operate that people are familiar with. However, this is not all true since there are some cases that the doctor might administer medication that help manage side effects of diseases but also cause the patients statues to degrade. This is what is known as the doctrine of double effect. In an accident scenario, a doctor might try to relieve the pain of a victim using a drug that might cause their liver to shut down in the process killing them. However, this person will not die painfully but gracefully slip to oblivion.
To most people, the thought of taking a life is something that should not even be put into discussion. While most cultures are very
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Considering the different ideas behind these issues, this study will not only differentiate active euthanasia from passive euthanasia but also discuss advance directives concerning its double effect. Introduction Life and death are two significant parts of the life cycle.
Charles Darwin and modern-day evolutionary scientists see complex designs in organisms as the impact of slow or gradual changes in traits and behaviors across time (Burgess, 2005, p.3). The changes are small and slow enough to happen that they occurred after millions of years for millions of organisms (Burgess, 2005, p.4).
2003). A year later, Belgium followed suit and passed a similar law to regulate euthanasia (De Beer, et al. 2003).
As other countries begin to contemplate similar laws, we must consider the position of nurses amidst the euthanasia controversy-not just their physical involvement, but their emotional involvement, legal position, and the spiritual conflicts they may encounter along the way.
Fate is a complementary feature of faith, a by product of past acts, concluding history of one's worldly breath and values of life at a given time. I believe that everything happens for a reason. Events are an art of life to make us pamper life more or pause in the hustles of our daily buzz for a moment of self reconciliation to spend in silence and discern what God has in store for ourselves to wherever our present leads us even to a vaguely discerned future.
Life is valued but in certain conditions when it is extremely painful or intolerable, the word euthanasia that is merciful end of life comes to the minds of patients, their families, or medical authorities. The aim of this essay is to discuss euthanasia, definition, types, religious, cultural, and ethical debate, to reach a conclusion of how and when euthanasia can be ethical (if ever).
In effect, euthanasia is the final resort to terminate a person's prolonged suffering when all other medical, psychological and physical avenues for better health and better care no longer exist.
Legislative discussions for permitting active euthanasia in various countries have been repeatedly debated among their public, the politicians, the jurists, philosophical ethicists and even medical practitioners resulting in drastic to insignificant or ambiguous changes in the concerned country's legal framework.
(Seamus Cavan Sean Dolan, 2000) suggested that Euthanasia means easy death or death without any pain.
In other words, it is the process whereby somebody is intentionally killed just to save him or her from one form of agony to another. The fact that the person
However, certain exceptions to such rules also exist around the world (Cooney & et. al., 2012). As apparent, the practice of euthanasia presents a pessimistic moral view to the care-giving obligations when treating
First, Leaders should have integrity in their way of governance because it promotes the public trust in the government (Palanski, Kahai, & Yammarino, 2011). The public trust is necessary for any government or institution that provides services
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Discuss the ethics of euthanasia for FREE!