Hot Coffee at McDonald's - Case Study Example

Hot Coffee at McDonald's Hot coffee is dangerous. If this woman was a cafeteria waitress used to lukewarm coffee, she might not have realized how hot McDonald’s coffee could be. It is not reasonable to assume that the customer knows the dangers of a product. A woman that makes lukewarm coffee might not realize that McDonald’s coffee has a higher temperature than home brewed. The only way a fast-food or take-out restaurant can prevent lawsuits is to inform the consumer. McDonald’s now have signs warning coffee and hot drinks can burn.

Information can help the consumer, while protecting the business from lawsuits. Society can never protect the consumer enough. The consumer needs to be satisfied to return to a business. If society protects the consumer, more consumers will be happy. If a consumer is happy, more business transactions can be completed. This is good for both the consumer and businesses."Drug Dilemmas" Prescriptions should have a fair price value, although sometimes do not. That is why generic medicine is cheaper.

Many patients want name brand, but the generic is the same ingredients. Prescription prices should be regulated like any other product. Cost of prescriptions should be based on manufacturing cost, profit, and loss. Pharmaceutical companies are businesses. They are in business to make money. Pharmaceutical companies are not in the business of helping people. Researchers might want to help people, but in the end business is what makes the American economy work. Pharmaceutical companies do not have a moral obligation to make lifesaving drugs in poor countries at little or no cost.

However, it does make good publicity if they do provide lifesaving drugs to poor countries at little or no cost. It also makes business sense due to tax benefits to charitable organizations. Morally pharmaceutical companies are businesses. They legally and morally should not sell drugs that harm. However, they do not have to give their product away for free. Pharmaceutical companies are businesses, not charitable organizations. "Hazerdous Homes in Herculaneum" Please respond to the following: The Doe Run Company should pay the costs of cleaning up Herculaneum.

Despite the fact the Doe Run Company has been in business before EPA laws on lead, the Company has been violating known EPA laws for years. This is why the Company should be responsible for cleaning up the town. Willful lawbreakers should have to pay the cost for cleanups. It is not the town people’s fault. The government is rewarding these companies by making it profitable to ignore the law through court actions. Laws should be enacted if a company is ultimately found in the wrong; penalties should be retroactive from the time litigation was started.

The companies that profited should be the ones to clean up hazardous pollution sites and waste dumps, this includes the government sites as well.