For the past two decades, proposals demanding for the adoption of alternative punishments have received much interest partly because there are presently more than 2 million people in federal and state penitentiaries (Kahan, 2006). …
Download file to see previous pages...
For the past two decades, proposals demanding for the adoption of alternative punishments have received much interest partly because there are presently more than 2 million people in federal and state penitentiaries (Kahan, 2006). Disappointed by the obvious failure of the criminal justice system to trim down offender populations at an acceptable cost, different intellectuals with distinct political objectives have suggested more cost-effective and more efficient techniques to diminish numbers of prisoners and reduce recidivism. Several of these alternative crime control methods are innately stigmatic and do not require imprisonment, like degrading community service, criminal fines, and, most contentiously, shaming sanctions. This paper analyzes and determines the nature and effectiveness of shaming sanctions.
Shaming Sanctions: Does it Work?
Legal scholars have largely focused on alternatives to imprisonment. Even though general alliances support further implementation of alternative punishments as a major issue, heightened academic debate has revolved around the adoption of shaming sanctions. Shaming sanctions are punishments intended to debase and stigmatize a criminal in public while encouraging a certain extent of public involvement in that debasement and stigmatization (Marshall, 2001). Specifically, a shaming punishment “exposes the offender to public view and heap[s] ignominy upon him in a way that other alternative sanctions to imprisonment, like fines and community service, do not” (Markel, 2001, 2155).
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
This essay discusses that controlling crime in the community makes people feel safe and protected. In another view, Schneier explains crime control as a condition that comes about from the establishment and maintenance of protective procedures, which are a surety of a state of inviolability from intimidating acts or sways.
The resulting theory is a sociological paradigm that is underpinned by the idea that societies are social systems and as such, are subject to change driven by a desire to make them more capable of providing for the welfare of those that constitute it. Thus, the structural functionalist focuses on the system and how it works rather than on the individuals in that system.
The aim of the case study will be to produce an accurate and well researched analysis on the crime control policy between the United States and the United Kingdom. The research will rely on extensive preliminary reading, with the body of the project producing certain findings.
(Umbreit and Greenwood, 1998) According to Marshall (1999) restorative justice is "a problem-solving approach to crime which involves the parties themselves, and the community generally, in an active relationship with statutory agencies" (p.5).
The main ethos in restorative justice focuses on a process which allows participation by the victim of crime, community representatives, the offender and families of the victim and or the offender.
The law is generally composed of the constitution and everything linked with its scope. (Pollock, 2007) When someone is breaking the law that means he or she is conducting a crime, and the person doing so is called a criminal. However, no one can just accuse someone of being a criminal.
As a result of this the international community in an attempt to combat it ,have set-up international security bodies such as the Interpol to be able to tackle crimes that also committed across borders.
To be more technical crime is any culpable action or omission prohibited by law and punished by the state.
In response to this, information is out in the open and anyone can access it. This has its adverse effects when information is misused and is used as a tool to harm an individual. Due to increasing of such activities, the federal government decided to take things into its hands, by coming up with laws related to cybercrime.
ny mature society always involves a balance of two competing interests: the need to protect the rights of the accused, and the need to combat crime and instill peace and order in society. “Legally, a crime is any act or omission proscribed by the criminal law and thus
However, the social relations need not be familiar, personal or intimate. Managing crime is more direct, diffuse and private, and always incorporates the community into the process of criminal justice (Burns,
Family feuds and conflicts can delay being resolved or not to be solved at all when such institutions are weak or impotent for that matter. In relation to Hatfield- McCoy, the Martin-Tolliver, the Hargis-Cockrell feuds, the Allen family, the Sutton-Taylor feud, and the
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Does Shaming Work as a Crime Control Policy for FREE!