A Demographic Analysis of Mexico - Assignment Example

Mexico: A Demographic Analysis: Mexico: A Demographic Analysis With the population of Mexico predominantly urban at 78% and exhibiting an increasing growth potential, it suffices an explanation for the huge segment of population’s access to basic amenities (clean water, electricity, sanitation and infrastructure), despite the fact that half the population was living in poverty as indicated by the demographics of 2002. This can be attributed to effective implementation systems in the provision of these services (in urban areas) to reach a diverse profile of the population.

The data provided shows that access to these amenities reduced marginally between 2002 and 2008, but well still above comfortable levels of 80%. According to any basic health model, the statistics on Mexico show a shift of lifestyle to a more urbane, aesthetic way of living that is characterized by lifestyle diseases such as obesity. Conversely, this comes with a reduction in conditions such as underweight and wasting as well as stunted growth. A reduction in hunger index from 5.99 on 1999 to 5.

10 in 2003 is also noted. These can be attributed to an aggregate improvement in health care and sanitation supported by gains in food security occasioned by an augmented economy. TB prevalence in Mexico can be said to be effectively managed compared to other countries. The cases of infection cited by the World Health Organization in 2009 pale in comparison to most States that have a higher infection index according to data from UNHDR. Again, this can be pegged on improved healthcare. Despite men and women accessing education at a proportionate footing of 51% to 49%, the frequency of women dropping out along the way is decidedly higher in rural areas.

A possible explanation lies in the vicious cycle of poverty that sucks in more women whose duties and obligations are largely domestic. These statistics show an indication that the environment in Mexico has reduced disparities of income and social status because of the positive parameters of growth, with an average income of 13500$, the level of poverty having dived from 50% with a fifth of the population reeling in extreme poverty as at 2002 to stand at 17.6% in 2009 (UNDP).