The paper “The Second Amendment and the Right to Bare Arms” will discuss the second Amendment of the Constitution, which protects an individual’s rights to bare or keep arms as a means of lawful protection in the event that a military or militia is not established…
Download file to see previous pages...
Prior to the ruling, it was not lawful to carry an unlicensed firearm, specifically a handgun. The ruling in favor of legalizing handguns was groundbreaking and served to challenge the hopes of many that America would soon embrace national gun control.
The core of the debate on gun control and the second amendment has to do with interpretations of the second amendment as well as America’s gun epidemic. Individuals who support the right to bare arms, feel that the right to own a gun is fundamental such as the right to freedom of speech or the right to vote. The problem however, is that gun violence is one of the leading causes of death in America and has only increased over the past few decades. The case of the District of Columbia versus Heller brought light to the fact that this particular area of the country held the strictest of gun regulations, “The landmark ruling overturned the District of Columbia’s ban on handguns, the strictest gun-control law in the country, and appeared certain to usher in a fresh round of litigation over gun rights throughout the country”(Greenhouse, 2008). Ultimately, the decision of the court stated that it was not the responsibility or within the jurisdiction of the court to reject or ignore the second amendment. On this basis, the decision to strike down the District of Columbia’s ban on handguns was made.
In the case of the District of columbia versus Heller, a special police officer is forbidden to keep a handgun in his home and therefore contends the rigid D.C. gun laws which feasibly contradict the allowances made by the second amendment, “Respondent Dick Heller is a D. C. special police officer authorized to carry a handgun while on duty at the Federal Judicial Center. He applied for a registration certificate for a handgun that he wished to keep at home, but the District refused.
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“The Second Amendment and the Right to Bare Arms Research Proposal”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1547457-the-second-amendment-and-the-right-to-bear-arms
(The Second Amendment and the Right to Bare Arms Research Proposal)
“The Second Amendment and the Right to Bare Arms Research Proposal”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1547457-the-second-amendment-and-the-right-to-bear-arms.
Women’s Liberation through the Equal Rights Amendment. The enduring struggle of women for their emancipation and for the attainment of equality remains a significant portion of the history of humankind. The fervent effort to eradicate the patriarchal set-up of societies and the culture of machismo therein overwhelmed the female species throughout time.
And we are not talking merely about health issues here. Rather we look into something more dangerous. And that is gun ownership. Gun ownership has been controversial because of the many violent crimes connected to shootings and killings with the use of guns.
The controversial Amendment states, in full, “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” (“The Constitution,” 2008). The Founding Fathers added the Second and the other nine Amendments, collectively called the Bill of rights, to further clarify the rights guaranteed to Americans in the Constitution.
In fact, it was a requirement in some colonies for men to carry muskets especially when visiting the church. Weapons were a sign of honor, dignity and courage. The colonists that explored the New World were threatened by the Indians. For security against attacks, every able bodied man had to have arms.
Many authors contend that individual gun ownership is arguably one of the oldest and perhaps the most notable uniqueness associated with the American culture. Gun ownership has been constitutionally been protected for nearly above two hundred years by the “Second Amendment” giving American citizens the opportunity and right to “keep and bear arms”1, however, governing legal provisions that define control is not similar in all Federal States and they shift from State to State.
Why the Second Amendment Should Not Give Citizens the Right to Own Assault Weaponry?
The Second amendment should not give private citizens the right to own guns as this right has been continuously abused by individuals and criminals alike. The United States of America’s constitution in regard to the second amendment states in part that a militia that is regulated for the reason of upholding the security of a state, the right of the citizens of that state to bear firearms shall not be regulated.
However, under certain terms the limitation of these rights is regarded as necessary so that other rights are secured. Such case exists in regard to the right of US citizens to have access to ammunition. The particular issue is set under examination in this paper.
The National Rifle Association has grown to be the most influential lobby group in the United States today because of its vehement opposition to gun control. This paper will not pretend to provide the ultimate solution to this profound
Simultaneous with the ratification of Amendment 2, nine other amendments were ratified on December 15, 1791. These are:
Amendment 2, together with the 10 other amendments, was probably considered very important
In 2008, the Supreme Court made a landmark decision regarding the 2nd Amendment. In District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), the Supreme Court ruled that an individual’s right to bear a firearm is protected
2 Pages(500 words)Research Paper
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Research Proposal on topic The Second Amendment and the Right to Bare Arms for FREE!