Abortion Ethical Issue - Essay Example

Sur [Supervisor's Abortion For countless years the debates about abortion continue to go on. With questions constantly being asked and argued. Should abortion be allowed Is the fetus really a living being Abortion, to the pro-life supporter is simply without a doubt, murder. Millions of people feel that it is unethical and immoral. When you watch TV and you see stories about children that have been beaten or killed by their parents, relatives, or even by a complete stranger. People become completely upset and outraged and want to know how something like this could happen Thousands of people are crying for those poor innocent, defenseless, unborn children. But yet, when it comes to abortion everybody is quick to say that it's not murder because the child is not born yet. Those who are against abortion would disagree, they believe that from the moment of conception the embryo or a fetus is full of life and then consider a living being. People don't realize how these babies are being destroyed. For instead one form of abortion is to cut out the fetus into pieces with serrated forceps before being removed. Then piece by piece is removed by a vacuum aspirator. Another form of abortion is to bring the fetus feet first into the birth canal, only to puncture its skull and sucking out the brain tissue. Then the body parts are removed being labeled as letters instead of being call what they really are. Then the remains of the fetus into plastic bags and then thrown in a dumpster to be disposed. Then on the other hand you have the pro-choice supporter. They believe that women have the right to do to their body whatever she see fit. Obviously people will never agree on the abortion issue. They will either be Pro-Life or they will be Pro-Choice. What ever they decides it will always be hot issues to debate. Pro-lifers believe that each human being from the time of fertilization to natural death has immeasurable dignity and an unalienable right to life. An embryo is a distinctive human life so should be provided the equivalent respect, moral status, esteem and dignity given to an infant, child or adult. In cases where the baby's life is threatened due to unwanted or unplanned pregnancies, alternative solutions to abortion such as adoption and family parenting should be considered. (Coffin, pp 6-7) The protection of all innocent human beings should be honored as a courageous life choice to be supported by our society. Pro-lifers sees life from the starts with conception view, for that reason when abortion occurs in a case of rape and incest where the victims are absolutely guiltless of those acts and does not ought to be killed because of the crimes of its father. Making a women bear the child of the rapist is absurd. (Seery, pp -9-10) This is a sufficient clue taken from the pro-life sentiment that such acts does not starts from the conception formulation. Abortion for pro-lifers is undeniably the taking of human life, the most elementary human right, - the right to life, in respect for the unborn child. The Pro-Choice movement believes that the woman has the right to control what happens to her body. A woman can have an abortion when she wants and for any reason. This argument is based on the right for a person to have free will. The Pro-Choice movement does not think that the government should have the ability to control what a woman does with her body. They say that to prevent women from having an abortion when she is ten weeks pregnant or nine months pregnant violates her constitutional rights. The Pro-choice movement says that if a woman is late in pregnancy and the doctors find out that this woman has a high risk of dieing if she gives birth then the woman should be able to abort the baby legally. They also believe that if the baby is unwanted then women should be able to abort the baby legally. (Goi, p-2a) The Pro-Choice movement says that if a child is unwanted then it will have a hard life because it is unwanted. It will grow up knowing that the child will know that it is unwanted and will have serious affects on the child and those around him. They say that the child is more likely to be abused and neglected than a wanted child, so if the child is unwanted then it should not be born. Because they believe this they fight for the right to have abortions. They do not want children to come into this world that are not unwanted for the child's sake and for the parents' sake. Many consider abortion is an ethical issue, but it is moreover a constitutional concern. It is a woman's right to decide what one wants to do with her body, and it should not be distorted by anybody else. This right is assured by the ninth amendment that includes the right to privacy. According to the ninth amendment "the enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people." (US Constitution) This right assures the right to women, if they so decide, to have an abortion, till the end of the first trimester. In spite of the fact of morality, a woman has the right to privacy and choice to abort her fetus. The populaces that hold a "pro-life" approach argue that a woman who has an abortion is killing a child. The "pro-choice" viewpoint holds this is not the case. (Clapman, pp 3-4) A fetus is not up till now a baby. It does not have the criteria consequent from the understanding of living human beings. Abortion is a right, and all rights are utter so cannot be "balanced" away. Consequently, a pregnant woman, like all other persons, has the right to find out her own fate and the fate of her body, to decide what comprises her own best concern and private happiness and to work for its achievement, so long as she respects the same rights in others. Works Cited Clapman Alice; Privacy Rights and Abortion Outing: A Proposal for Using Common-Law Torts to Protect Abortion Patients and Staff, Yale Law Journal, Vol. 112, 2003. Coffin, W. Shannen; The Abortion Distortion: What the 'Pro-Choice' People Have Done to Law, Medicine, and Language, National Review, Vol. 56, July 12, 2004. Goi, Simona; Agonism, Deliberation, and the Politics of Abortion, Polity, Vol. 37, 2005. Seery, John; Moral Perfectionism and Abortion Politics, Polity, Vol. 33, 2001. US Constitution, retrieved on April 15, 2006 from http://www.usconstitution.net/ Read More