Al-Kindis argument for the unicity of the divine being - Essay Example

The paper “Al-Kindi’s Arguments about the Unicity of the Divine Being and World as Evidence of God's Existence" is a dramatic example of an essay on religion and theology. Origin defines the beginning of an event or organism. It illustrates that every cause should have another behind it, which creates a chain of regression. A cording to this every cause can be able to link to its starting point. Al-Kindi indicates that every motion should have a starting point and the starting point should also have a cause.

The philosopher suggests that there is one power that cannot be created (Mingana 4). It serves as the center of all origin and creation. This, according to Al-Kindi, is God, the divine being. The arrangement and organization of the cosmos and the environment around mankind indicate that there should be a hand behind such work. This significant display of creation shows the complexity and proper [programming of the world. Nothing has been seen to be out of place, but everything shows satisfaction, where it is put by this force of nature.

Al-Kindi argues that the world is favorite evidence to prove that God existed. According to this philosopher, the world would not have been formed, if there would be no power behind it so as to bring this feature of creation. The display of plants and other creatures in it suggest that there must be a first cause that made everything into existence. This indicates that God had a choice to bring the world n existence or not. However, questions are raised, which put this argument into different discussions by philosophers.

If indeed God created the world, why did he have to create? Suppose he did not create the world, what would he have created instead? This can be true because the world would not have arranged itself naturally, but some cause in motion commanded it to be the way it appears. This shows that God is behind the creation and existence of the world (Mingana 6). Nevertheless, the arrangement of creatures in the world may not substantiate that God is responsible for their existence. For example, when crops are grown, they exist because of the favorable conditions of weather available.

If the weather conditions do not favor them, they end up withering and can not survive. This raises questions on those crops that survive and toes that dry up. It creates an argument of whether the drying of such crops involves God directly. If it involves God, then does it mean that those that survived were because God enabled them? A second account involves two animals. In this case, a lion is running after a squirrel for food. The predator needs this camel for it to survive. As Gods creature, it depends on the divine one, to enable it to get food so as to exist.

On the other hand, the camel has run so fast so as to save her life. The camel also depends on the divine one so as to save her life from eaten by the lion. This is because Al-Kindi indicates that the divine one has the power of creating and maintaining. This shows unfairness that reflects the erosion of the moral values of society.  Basing on Al-Kindi’s argument, that the world symbioses that there was a cause in motion, which animal can God side with and save since all creatures were created by him?

In addition since every cause starting point, then the divine one should have his starting point.