Muste and the Logic of Christian Nonviolence - Essay Example

? Essay Using To Academic Perspectives Task: Essay Using To Academic Perspectives Focus Sources have revealed that, Muste hassignificantly proved that, pacifism can hardly relate to passivism. Consequently, he concluded that, such things as non-violent revolutions by social activists could not exist. It is significant noting that, Muste has relied significantly on the psychological perspective on the use of nonviolent techniques. This implies that, Muste employed a basic rule that an individual’s actions accrue the exact rewards of their efforts. Consequently, one cannot do evil things and expect kind rewards. He further argued that, human beings are vulnerable to evil actions and inequities. Significantly, only an insignificant number is able to rebel inequities, and they do it rarely. However, he postulated that, for those who have cramped life, they have nothing noble for acquiescence, even the mere submission to a deity (Zinn, 1959). Argument It is worthwhile noting that; Muste has confessionary emphasized on the role of being up right in all endeavors. He has persuaded people to abide by right deeds and keep off the wrong doers for each shall receive according to his efforts. Consequently, for one to engage, tolerate, or trade in pacifism he his significantly not connected to passivism. Consequently, he has clearly provided a flourishing confessional approach on nonviolent confessions. Concisely, he has confessionary justified nonviolent revolutions by activists. Therefore, in a world based on violence, an individual must portray revolutionary aspects prior to pacifist qualities (Zinn, 1959). Counter- argument My argument is that, based on a confessional approach, the author that Muste has not inspiring addressed the issue nonviolence. Significantly, he has demeaned those individuals whom would feel sorry for their deeds and would wish to decline their evil lives. For instance, he has argued that, the evil doers do not have a right to access superior forces. Therefore, he has implied that, the righteous have an enhanced right of access to the deities. Concisely, Muste has confessionary, provided divergent insights on the nonviolence revolution, due to his incredible remarks on the fate of individuals who are acquiescent. Thesis statement Though A.J. Muste follows the logic of Christian nonviolence extremely carefully, the advantage of hindsight, this module explores the argument in pacifism as naive when adapted to the political realities of Muste’s time. Current research has revealed that, once certain war is over the challenge, is always based on the victor. Significantly, the above crisis erupts from the friction where there is a problem to identify the agent of teaching the victor. Consequently, there is hardly any other way towards peaceful coexistence apart from the peace itself. Additionally, current confessional approach on nonviolent revolution has revealed that, human beings posses some indolence, which makes them not ready to accept disturbances. Therefore, they presume that, whenever there are no skirmishes or unrests, peace is also prevailing. Significantly, they often subconsciously prefer social peace, although it is merely apparent. The above scenario is engineered by their feeling of fear over the security of their lives, as well as, properties (Zinn, 1959). It is evident that, disarming people is hardly possible and a war cannot be resolved unless there is a corporation of profound changes in the economy and the society’s social arena. Significantly, human beings must denounce violent activities in accordance with existing systems. In addition, they must denounce evil activities such as material, as well as, spiritual evils. Accordingly, those who accept to denounce wealth and power, which is gotten from violent activities and puts a premium on acquisitiveness, by identifying themselves with the struggling masses, may significantly fight violence. It is worthwhile noting that, theological scholars have argued that, throughout his life Muste has relied heavily on pacifism, as well as, through politics and theology. He was a renowned labor organizer, anti-war champion, and a mentor on civil rights. He has significantly, sought to discourage war and the increasing threat of destruction by nuclear. Accordingly, he has addressed the problem on two perspectives; the first perspective is about the alarming growth of mass destruction weapons. However, the second aspect is the political intransigence in the western bloc and the eastern bloc, as well. The first perspective has hardly been solved, while the second one has only been addressed by changing the critical players while the fight about resources is still yet solved (Zinn, 1959). Significantly, he was significantly worried that some technical mess-ups on computers would produce a nuclear oblivion. However, currently, human beings are lucky enough that they can significantly evade such fate. Nonetheless, plenty of numerous mistakes by some individuals globally, in about half a century ago, have killed masses through other non- nuclear means. Consequently, Muste lamented that, the increased probability of planetary suicide integrates with an aspect of negotiation. In addition, although there is a profound awareness on the numerous power positions, realizing at an alternative is significantly imperative. This implies that, Muste did not distinguish rival political leaders from religious rivals in their argument on irrational militarism. Consequently, the allegation that such leaders are righteous in their activities, can hardly justify a nuclear war. Moreover, a nuclear war cannot be justified and can never be logical to guarantee a defense. Therefore, it is imperative that, nations should cease from underwriting their fellow nations and alleging them as cruel enemies. In contrast, they should regard the war as the common enemy but not the nation. Significantly, the nations must regard the flourishing of a human person as their common objective (Zinn, 1959). However, for one to realize the above dreams, he must portray his readiness to put aside revenge whilst negotiating over nuclear activities. Therefore, he must work towards creating a globe free of nuclear weaponry. Accordingly, for one to fulfill the above goal, he must destruct the mere fantastical notion that massing weapons would decrease their probability of usage. This is because such a thought system would lead to a severe danger and the nuclear war would never be abolished. Accordingly, Muste has mobilized a new thinking system that would lead to a peaceful coexistence. Significantly, the only path towards an escape is often unilateral disarmament. Therefore, Muste has answered the intriguing objection that, someone’s enemies would overrun him. For instance, he recited the parable whereby he has argued that, a homeowner can hardly prevent burglary by destroying his home. In addition, he postulated that, the best way to demean the global dictatorial forces is largely by encouraging the US to become a role model by being sane, as well as, just. Moreover, he quoted a US’s uber- diplomat that, he hardly wished to live in a land where efforts are geared towards the next existing defensive device. Significantly, he has stated the need for urgency in action because things gets worse whenever numerous nations accumulate mass destruction weapons in their efforts to ensure sufficient security. Consequently, each individual must ensure personal responsibility for the nonviolent revolution and engineer a change for the course (Zinn, 1959). In conclusion, this module has comprehensively explored a clear focus about the A.J. Muste’s excerpt on Getting Rid of war. It has highlighted numerous justifications for the argument by rationalizing Muste’s work on nonviolent revolutions. In addition, the module has developed a counter-argument on the same excerpt in order to expose the excerpt to confessional approach, as well as social criticism. Significantly, the document has suggested some possible solutions towards creating a peaceful planet. For instance, it has stated that, a country should not disregard its rivals but instead it should demean the war as the common enemy between the country and the rival. In addition, the module has asserted that, the US as the leading superpower must develop strategies, as well as, set standards he would guide towards disarmament. Concisely, the module has significantly, agreed on Muste’s excerpt on getting rid of nuclear-based wars. Reference Zinn, H. (1959). The power of nonviolence, Writings by advocates of peace. Duncan, OK: Beacon press publishers. Read More