Nobody downloaded yet

The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Generally, science is understood as the study of empirically observable things in the world, while religion entails mainly to what is unobservable and immaterial and they cannot be detected by senses…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.9% of users find it useful
The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion"

Download file to see previous pages Conflict seems to be the most common interaction between religion and science. The two seem to conflict on nearly everything including conclusions such as the origin of man, the origin of diseases, and heliocentric solar system, as well as on how they arrive at their respective conclusions (Brooke and Numbers, 2011). Their conflict seem to emanate from what they rely on for their respective beliefs; religion relies on authority of supernatural being and truth that is supposed to be eternal and universal, while science relies on authority whose source is reasoning and evidence that are subject to challenge. It is this nature of conflict that informs the assertion by Ronald Numbers that the greatest myth in the history of religion and science holds that they have been in a constant conflict state (Numbers, 2009). There has been a raging debate regarding this assertion, with some agreeing with it, while others disagreeing. This essay will discuss how the history of religion and science has been in a state of constant conflict as argued by Ronald Numbers. The argument will be supported through a discussion of Newton, Einstein, and Darwin. The brilliant work of Isaac Newton in the seventeenth century gave rise to issues that strained the relationship between religion and science at that time and in subsequent years (Harrison, 2010). Newton’s arguments have been used by many scientists in their works and have been some of the greatest causes of the conflict between science and religion. Newton modeled the celestial bodies (the sun, earth, and moon) behavior through means that are largely mechanical by posting that the force of gravity was the only force responsible for terrestrial phenomena (Newton, 1953). His model postulated that terrestrial phenomena like the falling of heavy bodies to earth and celestial phenomena like the orbit of the earth around the sun was as a result of the force of gravity. He brilliantly combined his observation with mathematical model to formulate three famous motion laws: that a force of strength applied to a mass body leads to acceleration; that every action is paired with an opposite and equal reaction; and that a body at rest will always stay at rest, while a body in motion will keep being in uniform motion, unless an external force acts on it (Newton, 1953). The powerful and comprehensive work of Newton significantly contributed to the field of science as his principles account for a number of natural phenomena. Although he frequently argued that in the absence of a materially-mediated force, God might be directly responsible for gravitational force, he never categorically stated that the system of nature required God (Brooke and Numbers, 2011). His success and continued success in the field of success is viewed by many scientists as an argument for atheism. According to most of them, no one has any reason to believe that God exists, if God is not needed to explain the world’s behavior since mechanical and scientific principles can. However, religious arguments conflicts the science arguments as postulated by Newton (Morris, 1974). Contrary to Newton’s arguments, religion holds that God exists and he is the force behind everything including the terrestrial and celestial phenomena. Also, religion is of the view that the behavior of the world in the past and in present times can only be understood by inferring to a Supreme Being and not science. Besides, religion conflicts Newton’s arguments by arguing that the world’s complexity spoke in favor of the existence of God ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion Essay)
“The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion

Are science and religion in conflict

...and religion is depended on morality, faith and spirituality and hence both remains in conflict forever. All religion in the world is based on God and his attributes and science on other hand is a study of nature. The basis and principles of religion is passed on to people from their ancestors and elders and has strong grounds of belief and faith. But science is developed by studying and researching on elements of nature. Science only believes on fact and evidence based information and cannot rely on imagination and faith. The core reason for the conflict between science...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Are Science and Religion in Conflict

...? Are Science and Religion in Conflict? and number submitted Are Science and Religion in Conflict? One of the most controversial topics that continue to pervade contemporary society delves into trying to answer the question: are science and religion in conflict? Not only is this issue being discussed and reflected on in theological discourses, but also in diverse scientific disciplines. A quick glimpse of the topic, conflict in science and religion, using the online search engine generates more than 52 million results. This information...
8 Pages(2000 words)Research Paper

Are science and religion in conflict

...? Are science and religion in conflict? and number submitted Part One – Introduction of the Thesis Modern science began taking its true shape in the 16th century, while religion was around for a much longer period. The relation between these two great forces at times proved to be confusing, many-faceted and tumultuous. The real authority of religion lies on person or tradition or books. Truth behind religion is treated as universal and eternal, essentially a question of faith, and widely accepted and not challenged or questioned in general. In case of science, the authority is based on...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Galileo's Distinction Between Science and Religion

...where science and theology existed together in harmony (Sickler). This harmony however, tilted the balance in favor of theology and the scriptures on more occasions than not. This led to the stunted development of science in many ways. It is such a scenario that Galileo critiques in his letter and he also comments on the vested interests that had started to operate the forces of the church. He thus, takes the social and material conditions of the church into account while talking about the conflict that had developed between science and religion during his times. While evaluating Galileo’s position, thus, one also has to keep in mind the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Science and Religion

...? The conflict between religion and science had traveled a long way in the field of human history. Way back in the era when the church strongly believed the dogma disseminated by ancient philosophers that the sun and all the planets were revolving around the earth. A religious enmity aroused when Copernicus introduced the concept of heliocentric system, wherein the sun was the central point and all the planets and heavenly bodies were revolving around it. The conflict clashed when a more aggressive Astronomer in the person of Galileo Galilei supported the Copernican theory after he discovered the telescope and thereby pronounced guilty and sentenced by...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Are Science and Religion in Conflict

...? Are Science and Religion in Conflict? Are Science and Religion in Conflict? Many are the times when religion has various inconsistencies with science. While some people are alight with religion, some do not find this route appealing. As a matter of fact, there have been various debates that try to bring religion and science together. Many parties have come up with strong points that are aimed to settle the differences (Draper, 2010). However, not a single party is willing to water down their stand. As such, they have been in constant opposition as to...
6 Pages(1500 words)Research Paper

Science and Religion

...conclusions for, says Boyle, “whatever he tells us is infallibly true.”9 He also points out that even such brilliant minds as Galileo and Descartes have, like him, kept their faith intact despite being scientists themselves. Earlier, Boyle emphasized his point that certain phenomena could not be understood by reason alone because a being more powerful than humans exists. Boyle establishes his next point on the grounds of this same assumption: that the laws that govern nature is completely under God’s control. “He may invalidate most, if not all axioms and theorems of natural philosophy.”10 Boyle seems to imply that everything in the world can be arbitrarily decided upon by God and that this is where conflicts...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Religion and Science

...Religion and Science Many occupations in traditional India were controlled by specific castes, and caste status might govern such details of everyday life as access to health care, among others. The Hindu caste system is a “division of society based on occupation and family lineage” (Jayaram, 2010, par. 7). Tradition acknowledged the caste system as based on birth and the practice of nontraditional forms of technological developments in science would have significant effects on those who could avail or offer their services depending on the social strata or the main castes recognized by the traditional Hindu society. According to Robinson (2010), the caste system was “abolished by law in...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Science and Religion Debate

...functions by doing science. This is in relation to Newton’s assertion that religion is simply stories, and the stories are conflicting with how the universe functions. Further, he uses an Advancement of naturalistic science to support the death of religion. He states that Newtonian material science discredits the thought that blessed messengers push planets around. In addition, Darwinian development discredits outline contentions, including the particular case that Dr. Craig introduced. For example, Biochemistry hasnt illustrated how life started, however we will have the result soon, physics reveals to us that matter might be made...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Science and religion

... Science and Religion People with different levels of scientific expertise and faiths see no conflict at all between religion and science. They believe that these two institutions deal with the domains differently. Despite the declaration by some of the religious organizations that there should be no conflict between the two realms, some distinct differences and similarities exist. In analyzing the some of the texts by prominent writers, it is evident that the religious truths and scientific truths both conflict and coincide. The texts are Bastard out of Carolina, The Whale Rider and The Stoning of Soraya. Bastard out of Carolina-Dorothy Allison In this book, Allison perfects the art of fiction in her creative writing. She uses... difficult...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic The Myth of Conflict Between Science and Religion for FREE!

Contact Us