Our website is a unique platform where students can share their papers in a matter of giving an example of the work to be done. If you find papers
matching your topic, you may use them only as an example of work. This is 100% legal. You may not submit downloaded papers as your own, that is cheating. Also you
should remember, that this work was alredy submitted once by a student who originally wrote it.
"Personality and Business Psychology" paper contains the result from the author's Belbin test that is composed of different sections, each representing a different scenario to his/her individual assessment. In his/her responses to the test questions, the author allocated marks to the statements. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Extract of sample "Personality and Business Psychology"
Personality and Business Psychology
Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Course
City
Date
Results from the test
The result from my Belbin test is composed of different sections, each representing a different scenario to my individual assessment. In my responses to the test questions, I allocated marks to the statements, in line with how I felt the statement mirrored my working style. Overall, the report from my Belbin test has helped me to understand my team role contribution and to have the ability of situating my contribution within the setting of my team. Most significantly, by completing my Belbin Individual-Perception Inventory, I have learned about where I stand in terms of my team-role overview, team role partialities, team-role response, and my experiential team role weaknesses and strengths. The results are shown below:-
Implementer
Coordinator
Shaper
Plant
Resource investigator
Monitor evaluator
Team worker
Completer Finisher
Specialist
Total
10
19
7
17
18
9
13
16
12
The results shows the areas or functions which I may feel interested in and they are indicated with high score. Usually high score are anything above 13 or 14 and in the result shown in the table above, areas I am interested in include:-
Coordinator (19)
Plant (17)
Resource investigator (18)
Team worker (13)
Competitor finisher (16)
Table 2: Results characteristics
Type
Typical features
Positive qualities
Allowable weaknesses
Co-coordinator
calm, self-confident, controlled
a capacity for treating and welcoming all potential contributors on their merits and without prejudice
no more than ordinary in terms of intellect or creative ability
Plant
individualistic, serious-minded, unorthodox
genius, imagination, intellect, knowledge
up in the clouds, inclined to disregard practical details or protocol
Resource Investigator
extroverted, enthusiastic, curious, communicative
A capacity for contacting people and exploring anything new. an ability to respond to challenge
liable to lose interest once the initial fascination has passed
Team-Worker
socially-oriented, rather mild, sensitive
an ability to respond to people and situations and to promote team spirit
indecisiveness at moments of crisis
Completer-finisher
painstaking, orderly, conscientious, anxious
a capacity for follow-through, perfectionism
A tendency to worry about small things. a reluctance to let go
A critique of the tests and the testing methods
I agree with the Belbin result that I am a team worker as I love working in teams and enjoy the work of doing things together. However, I disagree with the result in MBTI which shows that I love working alone. I am a person that gives attention to group work. I also disagree with the result that I use perception as a personality as I am a person that have structured ways and principles of doing things rather than moving with the world.
The test of personality is not fully reliable as I have different results from my previous tests. It has been criticized for over twenty years that MBTI have varied results for the same person in case he retakes the test. From example from my first result, I was an introvert while the second take showed that I was an extrovert. Another criticism is that MBTI have only two choice answers for example you can either judge or perceive though it is evident that one can be neutral or that a person being dynamic can have a change in personality from time to time.
From my results and the others’ opinion concerning validity and reliability of the test, the tests can be relied on as it speaks more of who you are in seventy five percent accuracy. Therefore, I recommend employers to use this test to know who they are employing.
From what I scored in Belbin under the evaluator monitor behaviour and MBTI under Introvert, I stand a slim chance to be considered for a programme in trainee management. Nevertheless, there are other personalities which favor my entry for the position of management trainee including being a thinker and a plant.
I will go through training and consultations on how to fill in the questions to give me the best results according to who I am. I need to improve on how I work with the outside world as most companies need people who interact with the world and those who are able to work well in a team. I also need to be conscious when answering questions in order to be consistent with the questions asked to avoid chances of ambiguity in my results. For example I was a team worker in Belbin and an introvert in MBTI.
My observation of the Belbin test is that the approach promotes the restriction that people experience nine major Team Roles and that each individual can possess a capacity to exercise the given roles in different proportions. According to the theory, people have preferred behaviors. Nonetheless, my worry is that behaviors are not strategic. I consider the test as laying focus only on behaviors that occur within a man-made social setting. To be specific, the test documents biased impressions of previous work-based events, which were informed by individual expectations grounded on preceding subjective experience. In other words, I consider the theory as measuring social pressures and handling strategies without differentiating them. Whereas Belbin test may predict behavior in the future and address behavioral weaknesses, it does so depending on the proposition that the social setting of the subject will remain unaltered. Thus, my reasoning is that according to this test, a person’s behavior is predictable similar to that of a caged mouse. My tentative recommendation is that the test is unfit for persons moving between social settings. Based on my original thoughts, the test is good for measuring recurring behaviors in a given social setting. In other terms, I am skeptical of the test’s value in establishing suitable contenders for referral, recruitment, or promotion.
A targeted development plan aiming for success in a given job scenario.
The aim of developing an individual development plan is to document a self-analysis process, candid appraisal, and personal reflection of my strengths and weaknesses. I expect this plan to enable me assess the quality of the management and leadership training I have received, and to deliberate my future leadership development.
Personal SWOT Analysis
Areas of Strengths
Areas to Improve Further
My individual administration in the organization and primary skills are impeccable and my comprehensive knowledge is generally thorough for my training level. I am more confident and can cope with the pressures of the M and L course, even when sleepy. I was evaluated to be composed during hands-on work and gave perfect direction. Having the chance to lead a team for a stretched period, I demonstrated my capacity to provide right direction and manage individuals to attain given ends while working faced with pressure.
It was challenging to sustain balancing work and life and consistency in my physical fitness levels during academic sessions. Consequently, I have become less physically fit. I ought to commit more time in rigorous preparation before a session with my juniors. My comprehension of the planning procedure is still shallow in some parts and needs more development. To have greater confidence in authority, I have to build more team organization experience in differing settings
Opportunities
Threats
Demonstrating to the supervisor of my ability in both leadership training and planned management to lead teams into attaining given responsibilities. In addition, to pinpoint my exposure to a more planned method to analyzing challenges that would enable me in giving pragmatic answers that are valuable to the quality of my contributions for the organization I work with. This undertaking gives an opportunity for refreshment in a frenetic organization setting to attain an improved balance of work and life enabling me to be rejuvenated and more committed with work. I am hopeful that my line manager will support by guiding my personal development.
Balancing personal and job obligations
Friends having impact on decisions
Family’s pressure
I will go through training and consultations on how to fill in the questions to give me the best results according to who I am. I need to improve on how I work with the outside world as most companies need people who interact with the world and those who are able to work well in a team. I also need to be conscious when answering questions in order to be consistent with the questions asked to avoid chances of ambiguity in my results. For example I was a team worker in Belbin and an introvert in MBTI. Having short and long term goals will in my career path. Short goals may be like to complete my bachelor with a 2.1 to get accepted in my masters but also to gain eligibility for participation in various organizational project events.
Read
More
Share:
sponsored ads
Save Your Time for More Important Things
Let us write or edit the assignment on your topic
"Personality and Business Psychology"
with a personal 20% discount.