Sex Offenders - Term Paper Example

Sex Offenders Summary Relationship – based physical abuses remain among the leading causes of concerns registered in the variouslegal structures across the world. The United States has registered a significant number of such cases over the history of the existence of its judicial structures. The contemporary society has engaged in a number of reforms that steer towards the recognition of these acts among the criminal acts. The depth of such violence remains elemental in their categorization as acts of crime. Relationship – based abuses remains described along the level of interaction shared by the involved parties as well as the magnitude of their assault to the victims. The concept of domestic violence has been recognized over the ages as the ideal description of relationship – based violence. This is with respect to the manner upon which it was promoted to the general society. However, the turn of time has pointed on child abuse and school bullying among the list of the relationship – based violence. This paper seeks to reflect on the models of relationship – based violence with critical reflection being paired on their criminal dimensions. The instigating factors that contribute to their development will be examined in details, as well as the possible resolutions that could be engaged towards their elimination or mitigation. Relationship – based abuses The concept of relationship – based abuses remains accredited to a significant number of factors. This includes aggressive behaviours that are further coupled by the quest to install disciplinary objectives via the engagement of physical abuses. The concept of abusive disciplinary actions remains elemental in the description of the increased quarter of the registered violence. The occurrence of this model of crimes is principally geared by the concept of aggressive behaviours. Domestic violence remains essentially contributed to the spontaneous reaction of spouses against their fellow partners. The preference of a physical reaction over a consultative discourse in dispute settling remains anchored on their ability to judge on the fighting prowess of their partners. The registries that have been developed over the respective cases of domestic abuses point on the inability to conduct a sound discourse. Instead, the superior partners tend to dictate the dimension of the disputes by engaging their combat prowess against their partners. The feeble partners remain the elemental victims of such aggressive behaviours. Apparently, the science of psychology has proceeded to dictate a pattern that is endured by the victims of such violence. This is with respect to the eventual victim of the aggressive behaviour. The definition of crime that results from the concept of domestic violence remains articulated to the eventual assault that is developed. In some cases, the eventual outcome from such aggressive behaviours is considered fatal. Psychological reflections have painted scenarios of murder in these events. Apparently, the abuser may assault their partners to the extent of killing them through continuous bruises or fatal attacks. In other cases, the victims may have a calculated response that offers a fatal blow to their abusers. Such responses are geared by the discomforts that are associated with the actions of the offenders. Apparently, the legal proceedings focusing on the crime activities described from these abuses have reflected on this perception as an angle of defence. The victims of fatal defences have proceeded to argue that their action were propelled by the increased cases of constant abuses by their partners. However, the elemental arguments paired to this model of relationship – based violence remains anchored on the gender of the victimized parties. Women have been considered as the primal victims of these models of violence. This is in regard to the historical impression of their gender being considered feeble over their male counterparts. In some sections of the world, the men are considered as inferior if they register cases of relationship – based abuses. However, the contemporary society has witnessed a number of female-piloted abuses where the male partners are the elemental victims of the relationship – based violence. Another perception of these violence remains articulated under child abuses. This model of crimes are primarily considered as aggressive child disciplinary measures. In some cases, the concept of disciplining via caning or physical assault is considered a crime when the motive that leads to its occurrence is further weighed. The prospective effect ascribed from such events assist in the elucidation of the criminal intents considered as child abuse. Apparently, the vice is shared in a wide level of relationship. The child may be abused by the parents, guardians or even teachers. Additionally, the involved facilitators in the respective aspect of the child’s life may engage in such abuses. Irrespective of the participating parties, and the description of the shared union, the occurrence of these vices is usually considered a crime once the assault margins expressed on the child are considered. Subsequently, the concept of child abuse has been further articulated in regard to the level of activities engaged by the children under the supervision of their superiors. Apparently, the concept of child abuse as a criminal concern has been registered in a number legal legislations across world. The criminalization of aggressive behaviours towards the children remains described under the offenses captured by the aforementioned offenses. However, the arguments deciphered under this concern involves the description of the extent that allows for the disciplinary of rowdy behaviours in the children. The distinction between children helping their parents and the concept of aggressive commands towards the same victims has been described as a leading source of concern that have challenged the engagement of the aforesaid legislations (Miles, 2013). Conversely, the concept of bullying remains accredited along the same line of ideologies. This is with respect to the nature of these behaviours towards the children. The concerns aired along these challenge reflects on the responds offered by the victims as well as the actions proposed by the involved institutions. The relationship description that is considered by these concerns remains well fathomed under the impression of institutional rival behaviour. Children considered victims of these behaviours. Apparently, bullying does exist in a number of conditions. The presence of such bullies in the schools provides an opportunity for the acts of violence to trickle down to the neighbourhood interactions. This assists in the elucidation of the increased role that is anticipate to be exercised by the authorities that offer platforms for the exercising of these vices. The criminal perspective of bullying extends to both the action and reaction accorded to the occurrence of the vice. The ideal description of such events involves the inclusion of fatal injuries as well as the consideration of subsequent outputs. The perpetrators focus on the feebleness of the victims as the triggers of their actions. Etiologic theories related to the crime The occurrence of relationship – based violence has been considered explainable via the reflection of some critical etiological theories. These include the theories that seek to explain on the causatives of aggressive behaviours as well as the eventual reactions that amount from the continuous exercising of such vices. The reactions of the victims are, usually, considered explainable via the reflection of these theories. Additionally, the proposal of ideal solutions to curb the occurrence of these vices remains anchored along the prospective concepts described under the considered theories. This is with respect to the contributing roles they presume in the generation of the noted behaviours. Among these concerns include the behavioural and cognitive theories. These are mainly attributed to the crimes undertaken under domestic and bullying behaviours. The responds accorded to these vices are described to have been contributed by initial experiences encounters earlier in life. The elemental argument seeks to propose that children brought up in a domestically abusive family remain likely to engage in such behaviours upon getting a spouse. This is described as an effect of the environment of exposure. The perpetrator is said to have learned from the behaviours instigated by the parents. Additionally, the vices registered under bullying and similar behaviours have been linked to the previous experiences of life. These are captured under both the emotional and social cultural theories. Apparently, some societies consider bullying as a stage of initiation into the considered aspects of communal age sets. In some instances, the initiation of a new child that has shifted residence in a neighbourhood remains best described via the invoke of these practises. These allows for the reflection of the singular theories in the explanation of the respective roles they stand to impact on the respective vices (Lippman, 2013). Relevant prevention, intervention and treatment to specific criminal behaviour The concept of creation and correction has been anchored under the institutions that are tasked with the address of the behaviours. This mainly involves the penitentiary institutes, which are tasked with the correction of the respective cases. Additionally, the age of the perpetrator as well as the eventual magnitude of their offences under consideration are also reflected in the evaluation of the eventual correction measures. In some cases, the victims are treated under social settings that consider the rehabilitation of the involved persons. Apparently, the detection of these behaviours in institutions allow for the commencement of corrective measures that foster at the rehabilitation of the noted cases of agitation. Additionally, the concepts of intervention have been engaged as subsequent measures of mitigating these behaviours. This has been observed upon the disclosure of the abuses to close persons in the family circles. The art of confiding with the persons that remain of best interest to the victim allow for the intervention and the eventual mitigation of the vices. This perspective of intervention is principally engage in the cases of child abuse. However, the concern is also engaged in the rest of the aforementioned abuses. The eventual output described by the observation of these measures remains articulated along the desire of understanding the root cause of the concern and proposing effective interventions. The aim is further coerced by the interests shared by the involved parties with the eventual output being the elemental reflection (Andrews and Khavinson, 2013). References Andrews, A., & Khavinson, J. (2013). From International to Domestic Approaches: Battling Domestic Violence in the United States. Family & Intimate Partner Violence Quarterly, 6(1), 17-34 Halket, M., Gormley, K., Mello, N., Rosenthal, L., & Mirkin, M. (2014). Stay With or Leave the Abuser? The Effects of Domestic Violence Victims Decision on Attributions Made by Young Adults. Journal Of Family Violence, 29(1), 35-49. Horley, S. (2014). Addressing domestic violence through support and prevention. British Journal Of School Nursing, 9(1), 35-37. Husso, M., Virkki, T., Notko, M., Holma, J., Laitila, A., & Mäntysaari, M. (2012). Making sense of domestic violence intervention in professional health care. Health & Social Care In The Community, 20(4), 347-355. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2011.01034.x Lees, S., Phimister, D., Broughan, C., Dignon, A., & Brown, M. (2013). Domestic violence: The base of the iceberg. British Journal Of Midwifery, 21(7), 493-498 Lippman, J. (2013). “Ensuring victim safety and abuser accountability: reforms and revisions in new york courts? Response to domestic violence.” Albany Law Review, 76(3), 1417-1443 Miles, J. (2013). “we are never ever getting back together: domestic violence victims, defendants, and due process.” Cardozo Law Review, 35(1), 141-202. Ramsey, C. (2013). The Exit Myth: Family Law, Gender Roles, and Changing Attitudes Toward Female Victims of Domestic Violence. Michigan Journal Of Gender & Law, 20(1), 1-32. Sun, I. Y. (2006). Police Response to Victims of Domestic and Non-domestic Violence. Journal Of Health & Human Services Administration, 29(2), 145-172. Thornton, V. (2014). Understanding the emotional impact of domestic violence on young children. Educational & Child Psychology, 31(1), 90-100. Read More