Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/psychology/1604221-microskills-scenario-see-details
https://studentshare.org/psychology/1604221-microskills-scenario-see-details.
al Affiliation: Psychology micro skills scenario Confrontation is an aggressive act of facing opposition in life (Barnes, 2004, p 19). The person who feels offended or agitated with a certain situation may decide to face the other person in a bid to unleash the tension that has built up in them. The conflicting parties may then sit down and share their ideas. The end result is often unknown because the two parties may fail to meet up to the standards of the other party leading to more aggression.
The second skill presentment in the case scenario is proving information. When a client meets a psychologist, he or she ought to feel free and disclose every bit of information about their past. Such information is not only informative but a building block that guides the counselor in assessing the condition of the client. Providing information goes hand in hand with self-disclosure where the client is obliged to make herself known to the psychologist for the sake of clarity (Gleick, 2011, p 8).
The third skill presented in the scenario is silence. Silence is a passive act where a person decides to keep quiet and meditate or think about a solution to the problem at hand. More often than not, a person may keep quite because they fear overeating about a given issue or maybe the other party in conflict may overreact to the situation and cause more havoc. In the given scenario, a psychologist might use each of the skills mentioned above to offer the best piece of advice to Laura who is a new client.
At first, Laura is torn between confronting her fears in life and making them known to others. She then decides to seek the services of a psychologist. This means that the idea of confronting her fears is made real to the outside world. In so doing she is likely to know what other people think of her. It is often said that a problem shared is a problem solved (Kerry & Genny, 2005, p 31). For example, Laura is worried about her latest turn of events and she is undecided whether to confront them or not.
Likewise, Laura is not aware of Tamara’s reaction both at place of work and with Tamara.An example of the applicability of the second skill is seen when she confronts a psychologists and provides essential information that will provide a building block to facilitate getting a solution to the Laura’s problems. For instance Laura discloses her demotivation and consequent lack of concentration both at home and place of work. She ends spending sleepless nights and overeating in order to reduce her stress.
She even doubts her ability to work after being promoted and moved to another town which is a three hour drive. On the contrary Laura fears disclosing this information to her girlfriends because it will paint Tamara negatively and have a negative impact on their relationship. An example of the third skill is the need for silence. As a psychologist I would advise Laura to talk to people she can trust and make them know her position in the whole issue. Laura is considering being silent about the situation and concentrate on other things in life but it hurts her that she can hardly trust Tamara nor fulfill her needs (Stephen, 2000, p 11).
The distance between Tamara and Laura is bound to promote silence between them but according to the therapist it is more hurting to stick to hurtful feelings than being open and confronting the person at the center of the conflict. In the end we find that both skills presented have a connection to each other. The connection is either direct or indirect in that confrontation may lead to disclosure of information or silence. Either way both methods are embraced differently depending on the self will of the client and their ability to withstand pressure.
ReferencesBarnes, N. (2004). Crucial confrontations: Tools for resolving conflicts. New York Times: Nook Books.Gleick, J. (2011). The information: A history, a theory. New York: Pantheon Books.Kerry, P. & Genny, J. (2005). Crucial confrontation. New York: National Journal Group Inc.Stephen, P. (2000). Ontology and the wonder of silence: Silence as the ultimate fulfillment of the philosophical quest. London: Journal of wisdom and philosophy.
Read More