Jerry Sandusky - the Defense and Prosecution Side - Essay Example

The issue about specificity is the battle composed in the pretrial litigation part that determines the anticipated to be a vastly publicized trial. This paper shall analyze the argument developed by both the defense and prosecution side, and discuss in detail the probable side to win the case. The issue of specificity in Jerry Sandusky’s case, Sandusky’s attorney by the name Joe Amendola, developed an argument on the 12th March 25, 2012 hearing where he demanded further evidence from the prosecution side. Joe's opinion was that the prosecutor was to establish a date range through re-interviewing the accusers, to find out if they retrieve the alleged abuse occurring around an extraordinary event, such as a football game at Penn State.

Judge Cleland dismissed the request from the defense arguing that it was controversial. Cleland in his clarification noted that detail beyond the supplied ones would not be provided, since the prosecution lacked them. The prosecution argued that the extra details could not be found because the victims involved specifically, were children. Prosecutor McGettigan III stressed that the alleged victims experienced the abuse several years in the past when they were still kids and their memories about the incident possess repression (Viera, 2011, p. 4).

The alleged assault details provided with specific dates would enable Amendola investigators to focus on such dates. In my opinion, the defense side shall win the case in the end. The prosecution lacks evidence concerning the dates of the allegation. Children of ages above 15 years are people who have fully developed cognitively. Their memories are sharp enough to outline the order of occurrences, where and when they occurred. I would propose a ruling to dismiss Sandusky’s case. Based on the argument developed by Cleland that the prosecution lacks evidence is enough to drop the case. Lack of specificity would make the defendant present their defense inadequately. The defense team can develop arguments out of this disappearance to win the case over. Investigations stopped for almost seven years after the bizarre disappearance of Gricar.

For instance, the defense team could highlight a possible investigation by prosecutor Gricar, and term it as vague with a weak stand because his story is interconnected with the Sandusky’s. The ruling made by Cleland instructing the turning over of accusers’ juvenile records, written by Amendola that Sandusky knew several of the victims who held allegations of drug-related crimes. If the accusers were delinquently adjudicated for drug violations at that moment of association with Sandusky, the ability to collect information accurately and adequately would be affected. In conclusion, specificity is a vital issue in court cases. One can be purely accused when there is enough evidence to clarify the allegations against her or him. Read More