Discussion Debate - Research Paper Example

Nonetheless, this paper will focus on establishing a discussion regarding Early Head Start Program, whereby it will seek to determine whether it is effective ot not. Therefore, this will entail points supporting and against the motion that Early Head Start Program are effective, and the paper will conclude by taking a stance based on evaluation of the arguments raised in terms of their strength and relevance. Arguments against the Motion There are limitations associated with Early Head Start Program, whereby the thirteen eligibility tests involve a level of misrepresentation of families in various cases (Muhlhausen, 2008).

In this case, providers of these services focus on persuading these families to join this program, thereby encouraging them to attend all classes. The program offers a chance for fictitious families to misrepresent their eligibility, however, there are other members of staff, who disregard these fictitious families’ income, thereby making them eligible (Muhlhausen, 2008). Furthermore, there are other cases where doctored documents are use in a way that excludes the originality of income information, which is provided to the staff.

For instance, some parents may claim to be unemployed, even if there are other proofs that both parents are earning income (Muhlhausen, 2008). A study conducted to evaluate effectiveness of Early Head Start Program indicated that the positive effects associated with this program are trivial; in fact, there are notion that these effects disappear at the end of the first grade (Klein, 2011). For instance, studies have indicated that the performance of graduates from Early Head Start Program have the same performance as the students who never had a chance to participate in the program (Klein, 2011).

On the other hand, other researchers contend that there are no chances of running effective Early Head Start Program by the federal government. In this case, this has led to the perception that Early Head Start Program is ineffective; thus, they are considered a way of wasting money on poor neighborhoods (Klein, 2011). Early Head Start Program has a negative impact on their math ability among children at the age of three years; in fact, this has been indicated through assessment by teachers in kindergartens (Muhlhausen, 2008).

There are other reports indicating that children who do not participate undergo a better preparation through acquisition of math skills compared to those who were participants of Early Head Start Program. Nonetheless, this program is considered wastage of taxpayers’ money, whereby more than one hundred billion dollars has been spent on these programs since 1965 without substantial evidence of improvement (Muhlhausen, 2008). According to various evaluation conducted by the government, there are not findings of effectiveness regarding its impact on children, since after the first grade, children who participated and non-participants does not have any difference.

On the other hand, Early Head Start Program has not shown any evidence of having any effects on participants’ socio-emotional, health, parenting results. For instance, the period spent by participants who are four years of age did not give any indication of these effects during a research; in fact, there