The Phenomenon of Hate - Research Paper Example

This ‘truth’ is a misrepresentation of the real gospel truth because we know for sure God does not hate sinners but the sin they commit. In this respect, the site manipulates people into hating fags on the false premise that God also hates fags, but this is not the case.

All hate sites encompass prejudice and a relentless desire for supremacy, and they aim to manipulate people into hating certain groups of people. Hate sites are used to propagate ideas that certain groups of people are inferior and a threat, thus they should be cut out from the rest who are considered superior. For instance, the “Resistance” site propagates a pro-white racist ideology that seeks to empower the whites while repressing the non-white population; therefore, the ideology portrays the whites as superior and the rest as inferior. The site is prejudiced against the non-whites in its pro-white activism. In this respect, hate sites are a mechanism for empowering certain groups of people while repressing other groups; this goal is achieved when a given hate ideology gains support from the masses. For instance, the resistance ideology seeks to empower the whites while suppressing the non-whites; if there are more advocates for such an ideology, the whites are strengthened while the non-whites are repressed.

At the core of all hate sites, is a deeply entrenched fear that naturally forces the advocates of hate ideologies to seek supremacy for their kind. The advocates of all hate sites seek protection against their perceived enemies or threat, and the only way to do this is to seek more power against the perceived threat. For instance, “The Insurgents” hate site has a pro-white ideology that seeks to protect the white population against the insurgency of the non-white population; therefore, the increasing non-white population, whom they perceive to be insurgents, threatens the white population. It is the fear of the insurgents that motivates the hate ideology of the site, and the desire to empower the whites to overcome the threat of the non-white insurgence.

The hate sites thrive on the advocates’ feelings of hatred for the target groups of people who are deemed inferior or a threat; in this same manner, it is also true that the hate sites rely on the advocate's love and social binding with one another. The sites give the advocates a sense of belonging and identity, thus a shared love and social bond that is expressed in terms of overwhelming support for the groups’ advocacy. For instance, in all the pro-white hate sites the advocates share a common bond of love and identity as ‘whites’, thus the group hates all other groups of people that are non-white. The “Jew watch” hate site propagates hate against the Jews by portraying their heinous side; the site thrives on the advocates’ hatred for the Jews and overwhelming support for the anti-Jewish ideology.

The hate ideologies propagated by the above sites only differ concerning their aims, nature of advocacy and target victim groups; concerning aims, each hate ideology aims to achieve certain goals that are unique to the specified group of hate advocates. For instance, whereas “The Insurgents” pro-white ideology aims to stem multiculturalism by opposing race mixing, the resistance ideology aims to empower the whites. The ideologies expressed by each site target specific groups of people based on varying criteria such as race, sexual orientation, colour and religion among other criteria. For instance, whereas the ‘GodHatesFags hate ideology targets the gay community, the insurgent’s hate ideology targets the non-white population. The hate ideologies also differ in terms of the nature of advocacy; for instance, whereas some are pro-white like the insurgent and resistance, others are pro- heterosexuality like ‘god hates fags’.

Ultimately, all hate sites portray many similarities in terms of how hate ideologies are employed to repress certain groups of people while empowering others. All hate sites distort truths to manipulate people’s ability to make sound moral judgments; this results in distorted opinions and perspectives. However, despite the similarities inherent, all hate sites propagate specific hate ideologies that differ in terms of the nature of advocacy, aims of advocacy and the target victim groups.