Dynamics and Logic of Productive Thinking - Essay Example

? Dynamics and Logic of Productive Thinking Bibliography Wertheimer was born in Germany. He had a short stint at a in Germany. He served in the tertiary institution of Frankfurt where he promoted the ideology known as the gestalt theory. Within the framework of the theory he postulated that critical thinking was important in problem solving. In fact, he perceived problems to be having geometrical representations. During Hitler’s reign he moved to New York where he later died. Introduction Gestalt theory or, rather, the dynamic theory of thinking was the result of actual studies in logic, psychology, and epistemology. The existing state of affairs at the moment of its foundation may be briefly drafted as follows. We depart from the world of day by day's proceedings to that of science, and not extraordinarily presume that in making these changes one will gain a deeper and more particular understanding of the essentials. The change ought to mark progress. Although one may have gained a great deal of skills, one is not as good as before. This is the same in psychology. At this point, we find science objective upon a methodical gathering of facts, yet frequently not including through that very action accurately that which is most vibrant and genuine in the living occurrence it seeks to study. Max Wertheimer states that somehow, the thing that matters has eluded us. Max Wertheimer concept seeks to answer what comes about when a predicament is solved (Wertheimer, 1959). He further states that common as this incident is, finding the answer to this is rather difficult. In cases of poverty, aridity and inessentiality he observes that there is abundance. However, what is really significant is missing. In its place, we are told of the configuration of concepts, generalization and abstraction, of class judgments and concepts, possibilities of intuitions, creative fantasy, associations, talents - anything rather than an answer to the primary problem. Psychology is sated with stipulations of great potentiality including essence, intuition, personality, and the rest. But when seeking to take hold of the concrete subject matter, such terms do not pass. Possibly, science by now represents methods heading in a completely different course, processes which have been constantly muted by the apparently essential, leading ones. It is imaginable, for example, that a mass of specifics and problems have been hidden rather than clarified by the current scientific custom. Even though the usual techniques of science are unquestionably sufficient in many instances, there may be other cases where they lead us off course. Perhaps, something in the very scenery of the usual attitude may have led its proponents at times to pay no attention to specifically that which is really necessary. The elementary method of this theory might be explained in this way. The theory states that there are wholes whose activities are not resolved by that of their separate elements. It is the expectation of this theory to ascertain the character of such wholes. With a formula such as this, one might shut down, since dynamic theory of thinking is neither more nor less than this. It is not concerned with solving philosophic queries which such formula might propose. Dynamic theory of thinking deals with actual research; it is not only outcome based but also device based. This means that is not only a hypothesis about the outcome but a way leading to further findings. This is not just the suggestion of one or more queries but an effort to see what is actually happening in science. It is impossible to get to the bottom of this problem by giving a list of possibilities for the arrangement, classification, and systematization. If it is to be tackled at all, we must be directed by the spirit of the innovative scheme and by the actual nature of the items we are learning Max Wertheimer set ourselves to go through to that which is in actuality presented by nature. There is an additional complexity that may be demonstrated by the following instance. Let's assume that a mathematician demonstrates to you a scheme and you commence to organize it. This scheme, you say, is of a certain nature, fit in this or that chronological grouping, and so on. The mathematician will be very strict with how you handle and present the scheme. What holds for this mathematical method is relevant as well to the formula of Gestalt hypothesis. The effort of Gestalt theory to reveal the practical sense of its own method is no less firm than is the mathematician's effort. The effort to clarify Gestalt theory in a brief essay is difficult due to the stipulations which are utilized: whole, part, the intrinsic determination. They have in history been the subject of never-ending discussions where every disputant has appreciated them in different ways. And still worse has been the classification approach taken on towards them. What they required was definite research. Like numerous other "philosophic" predicament they have been suspended from contact with realism and scientific effort. Max Wertheimer states that he anticipates for a brief discussion to propose a number of the problems which presently covers the attention of this theory and something of the system they are being tackled. The dilemma does not simply deals with scientific work. It is a basic problem of modern times. Dynamic theory of thinking is not suddenly plunged from above; it is, rather, a blatant union of problems ranging all the way through the sciences and a variety of philosophic point of views of the modern period. Logic refers to both the study of forms of way of thinking and the use of a suitable way of thinking. In the second sense, reason is used in nearly all brain activities, as well as science and philosophy. On the other hand, the first sense is studied first and foremost in the subjects of mathematics, philosophy, semantics, and computer science. It looks at universal forms that point of view may take. In mathematics, logic is the study of suitable inferences within some official language. Logic is also deliberate in argumentation theory. Logic was studied in more than a few ancient cultures, including China, India and Greece. Logic was recognized as a formal branch of learning by Aristotle, who gave it a primary place in philosophy. The study of reasoning was an element of the conventional trivium, which also incorporated rhetoric and grammar. Logic is frequently separated into three parts, abductive reasoning, inductive reasoning, and deductive reasoning. Conclusion In conclusion, a sense of the philosophical and human introduction to psychology permeates dynamic theory of thinking. Their analysis of random classification, of centering on narrow details, was found on scientific thoughtfulness. They also showed a concern about the critical insinuation of such events for an outset of man. Science is an approach to elucidate the main subject of mankind. If psychology does away with or disfigures vital particulars more so, if these are corresponding to the key proof about his scenery, man himself will appear in modest relation. Gestalt theory queries the hypothesis that certain assurances widespread in psychology were systematically consequential. The rebuff of understanding the observation that proceedings and verdicts followed are subjectively determined. The handling of worth in terms of unbiased particulars, and the resulting denial of applicable value did not essentially follow from scientific philosophy. There is also the superiority of moral hopefulness in dynamic theory of thinking, which a number of people may deem not scientific. This indict cannot be simply leveled against a faction that severely resist the method of vitalism to particulars of existence and that required to find a foundation for psychology in natural science. The indict itself may be an illustration of ethical cynicism. I believe Gestalt's strengths is that they can explain ambiguous figures and fiction very well. I believe Gestalt's theory potency is that they can clarify unclear information and fiction very well. However, Gestalt's flaws cannot give details to numerous visual delusions, for instance, the Muller-Lyer illusion. Reference Wertheimer, Max (1959). Productive thinking. New York: Harpers and Brothers. Read More