Ethical Development of the Individual - Essay Example

? Ethical Profile Paper Ethics aims at providing a solution to the issue of wrong and right that takes place in the daily life. Nevertheless, even more fundamental is opting to do the right thing. Ethics at the same time may serve as the basis that individuals judge others, even though a right thing for one person may not mean it is right for the other. Personal ethics refers to how an individual will manage his activities. This relates to his personal beliefs regarding what is incorrect or right. It is a prominent system whereby an individual decides what is incorrect or right in his daily life. For instance, writing personal ethics takes the form of first person stating the things that an individual thinks are valuable to him or her, which includes reliability and honesty. Personally, all individuals are equal, and they all have the capability of distinguishing what is right and wrong thus behaving accordingly or face the repercussion. Therefore, the violation of an individual’s personal ethics results in that individual feeling guilty. On the other hand, an organization or professional organization establishes professional ethic s meant to regulate behavioral conduct of individuals within that environment. Personal ethics applies on the individual’s professional life since it guides the wrongs and rights related to daily chores (Dorrien, 2010 P 111). For instance, professional ethics within an organization are usually statements that convey the values of the business. It may reveal the decision that a company is making to its workers, stakeholders and the community at large. Nonetheless, one should acknowledge that not all members of the society possess similar code of ethics. A director will have various obligations than a subordinate to accomplish what is right concerning the company’s standards. However, these professional ethics are usual lawful and present some implications upon breaching the professional ethics. Breaching professional ethics like due diligence or confidentiality may cause sanctions and legal consequences. Modern societies and most current economic activities assert the significance of ethics in the business environment. In order to adhere to admirable level of moral leadership and standards, people must become acutely aware of their fundamental moral behavior and have knowledge of all the four ethical behaviors. These four elements of personal ethics include character, obligation, results and equity. Out of the four noble behaviors assessed, character comes first. Character depicts the psychological and cultural make up of an individual. According to Andersen, the character behavior is one that individuals bases their behavior on that which is suitable to be rather than what it is preferable to make (Andersen, 2004 P. 112). Showing the best qualities will make every person make a moral decision even under adverse conditions. This, therefore, means that there is a need to dwell more on the personal considerations when judging an individual than actions to determine whether they are decent with respect to the person's status (Andersen, 2004). Various factors are considered, when assessing the moral values of individuals by checking at their character. These elemental factors making up an individual’s character includes aspects of merit, justice and honor (Andersen, 2004). People who values character and relates it to morality believes that a person’s character is more fundamental than their acts and believe that the individual actions alone cannot make them respectable without a fundamental longing for upholding unimpeachable ethical values (Andersen, 2004). Several individuals lack the qualities people with this ethical behavior value because of conflicts faced in the community, which includes social and wealth inequality among others. Many individuals fitting this description convey that they value truth within a given organizational setting, although individuals whom are not truthful largely over use the term. Personally, I base my moral ethical behavior on obligation, which means I create moral decisions based on the responsibility and adherence. I base ethical decisions on principles laid down during nurturing, in the community as well as the workplace. People of my class who match this behavior pays attention to intent rather than results. Essential principals for this behavior include self-respect, esteem and personal freedom. This behavior insists the sense of treating every person like a human being instead of a way to achieve an agenda. This behavior desires the most excellent for each person. Therefore, we do not think about the entire community because we are concerned about individuals who do not get the same treatment. We respect individual freedom, provided individuals make warranted, and confident decisions, individuals should feel reluctant to come up with certain decision they think of. We firmly believe it is unwise to make decisions, which are reckless. It is, therefore, more beneficial to take an accountably amount of time to get intelligible and ethical decisions (Andersen, 2004 P. 160). Liberty of communication and development takes centre stage compared to the results. If individuals do not learn from mistakes they encounter during their decision-making processes, then they will make unethical decisions in the future. Individuals fitting this group are real players, when they fail to agree on certain decisions in the end; they perform what is right for the organization. The moral behavior of results looks at the outcome and the implications of individual’s actions. People who fit this ethical behavior survey which decisions are relevant to many people. In relation to, what is more, essential for the majority that is the manner in which moral decisions are made. People have to follow through with their acts approach in order for people fitting this behavior to see them as a moral individual. At the end of it all, what materializes is the bottom line. This superb quality can be considered, in part, by the extent of satisfaction conveyed by the better part of the people who make up the whole community”. However, when the best part does not accept justice is prevailed by tackling the dispute and making the appropriate adjustments. There is an ethical sense of responsibility to take care of what is in the paramount concern of the majority by assessing the trade-offs. The moral behavior based on results likes making improvements to the environment in order for individuals to enjoy studying and doing projects together. Usually, individuals who do not have the element of results face problems since they are not considering what is expedient for the entire society. People see the behavior primarily as reasonable since individuals fitting this description have the ability to determine and base decisions on what is in the best interest of many rather than thinking of their own selves, or trying to judge every person. They understand that choices made will not make everybody happy though they can serve to, please the majority. The basis of ethical behavior of equity lay on the inadequacy of knowledge and the aspect of human ruling. Individuals fitting in this standard are extremely talented by utilizing their day-to-day experiences as a road map to make moral decisions. Decisions get ruled based exclusively on rational and implications of the acts to come after. Every situation receives independent ruling in a reasonable and fair manner (Lebeer, 2002 P. 179). Individuals with this behavior have a hunch that there are no absolute principles of wrong and right. It is almost impossible, for individuals who fit the description of this certain behavior to uphold ethics since the aspects of wrong and right does not exist in their minds. John McDonald is not only my Ethical Hero but possess ideal ethical principles with respect to moral values. As he drove to the work place from his residence in West Covina to Venice, California, along L.A.’s 10 Freeway, he came across a burning vehicle, flipped on its part. McDonald stopped immediately and went a crucial step further. He learned that three occupants had run away from the vehicle, but one of the passengers began shouting to him to rescue her grandchild trapped inside the car. At once, McDonald ran to the burning vehicle and dragged the young girl out. The vehicle could have blow up. Both McDonald and the child could have burned. However, he endangers his personal life for an outsider. The hero can serve, as a role model in that we can merely believe that under the same problem individuals would respond as John McDonald did. I think bearing his story in the back of everyone minds can let that to happen. Whatsoever, grouping of key ethical standards such as character, courage, and selflessness serve well to define an individual’s ethical make up. Based on this context, I appraised McDonald as my personal hero. McDonald influenced my value system thoroughly. I know for real that many people would have slowed down, make a decision that someone would be taking action soon, and speed up. Others would have opted to call 911. Another group of people would have stopped to check whether anybody was injured, a respond that would be further exemplary. Two, critical ethical, decision-making styles promote my decision-making. They include the pragmatists and idealists style. In this case, of pragmatism approach means that personally I am extremely interested with the current happenings and not with both self and others (Dorrien, 2010 P. 118). It is facts and the latest happenings that guide my decision making. Therefore, when one is relating with a pragmatist, he should emphasize facts as well as anticipated effects of the action. On the other hand, the idealist approach means that am driven by both principles and rules. With this style, I tend to set in my approach to ethical matters. At my current area of work, I have a high probability of encountering ethical dilemmas on a day-to-day basis. Within a given organizational setting, different individuals may not judge things from my perspective. Ordinarily in a company’s setting, when making decision individual interest comes after other issues. I stand on my principles, when I am in a situation, where I feel securely regarding deprived ethical decisions, I go after policies in spite the opinions presented by other members of the society. Many individuals who I may not be in agreement with typically are not doing things in their own personal interest (Lebeer, 2002 P. 201). Ordinarily these individuals think of the company instead of themselves. Nonetheless, my spirit of the following policy does not translate that my choice is the best. Unluckily, protecting my ethical behavior can produce economic adversity, retrenchment and loss of promotion. Finally, standing by my principles is the most fundamental activity; in case the outcome becomes negative, it was not an appropriate placement. Ethical development is, for many people, a lifelong development. In this course, there are areas I believe I can make a lot from further developments. This includes the creation of a professional development website by the association. The site brings together all the needed materials required to carry out online research and access to the current professional opportunities. Another key area is the creation of Code of Ethical Principles and Rules of Conduct by an organization. These are a complete set of set of laws and guidelines meant to protect the entire public and make sure that individuals preserve the utmost ethical principles. It gives statements on agreed conduct that guides the professional behavior of individuals and guarantee professional services. In addition, an individual can accomplish more development in several ways. These include attending professional development like seminars and pursuing online courses. Another thing is joining a library of articles that offer online resources like books and various publications. Individual need to have profiles of planned alliances, which institute affiliate benefits and relations to academic associates. In addition, people need to subscribe to monthly electronic circular as well as other equipments and guidelines for career development. References Andersen, B. (2004). Bringing Business Ethics to Life: Achieving Corporate Social Responsibility. USA, NJ: ASQ Quality Press. Dorrien, G. (2010). Social Ethics in the Making: Interpreting an American Tradition. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. Lebeer, G. (2002). Ethical Function in Hospital Ethics Committees. USA, NJ: IOS Press. Read More