Putting the Mind in the Brain by David Neumann - Research Paper Example

Most of these students’ specializations entail science and psychological fields, which logically ought not to be a problem as compared to nonprofessionals who will require exhaustive explanation to get the concept. Hence, Neumann draws evidence from numerous studies that entail their specialization to aid them to comprehend it better together with providing their instructors with the correct approach that will assist in the process of imparting the concept. Neumann scientifically utilizes numerous pieces of evidence to prove the absence of any distinction between brain and mind, where he states that the two words are a matter of linguistic convenience.

Hence, two words imply one thing. Since, the brain is constituted of complex processes that exhibit themselves via a person’s external behavior, which numerous people notably in psychology and scientific fields tend to attach the necessary essence. The article is extremely intriguing since it provides informational evidence that has support from reliable sources regarding varied aspects of substances, which may affect brain processes. These encompass voluntarily clinical induced drugs, additives, or brain damage, which may act as a hindrance to the brain not working appropriately.

The most intriguing aspect of this study is how the author incorporates varied evidence to attest to his argument. Consequently, making the source more valid, this via actual experiment is unattainable and it will be more expensive besides time involving. Besides the study arguing against any distinction between brain and mind, it hypothesizes that an individual’s behavior mainly emanates from diverse brain processes caused by altered conditions. This emanates from either external circumstances or induced varied chemicals that try to alter one’s state of mind and depict behavioral differences.

The author results in intensive research that entails revisiting other valid sources with an intention of augmenting student’s interest in appreciating biological mechanisms. Since this is the basis of a man’s behavior while in varied circumstances. The author in this study focuses on expounding his diverse evidence. He also asserts that students together with their teachers must not underestimate biological mechanisms as the source of varied behaviors. According to Neumann's findings, numerous students especially from the science-related and psychological fields seem to disregard biological mechanisms, which act as the source of behavioral variations.

This is evident even in animals, for instance, rats and dogs that are the main samples in Phylogenetic testing. Additionally, the study’s second subject entails arousing interest among the students and teachers in appreciating biology mechanisms. Besides, the substantiation being logically understandable, it has scientifically proved that it is undeniable in demonstrating the mystery behind behavior variance in humanity. Neumann's methodology encompasses utilizing the collection of information from other reliable studies.

In his research, Neumann takes six pieces of evidence that encompass phylogenetic, genetic, clinical, experimental, brain recordings, and experiential (Neumann). In all the evidence, he tries to elaborate the basis of his argument with the intention of depicting how brain processes may vary under certain circumstances and conditions. 

For instance, Phylogenetic, whose basis is on evolution across species, shows how animals possessing brain complexities depict high cognitive capabilities. The evidence compares a dog’s brain with that of a rat, mainly utilized in scientific experiments involving innovations destined in finding solutions meant for human medicine. Other evidence entailed either altering environment practically or inducing chemicals to activate the brain, which yields varied behaviors depending on the brain’s complexity. The final evidence is the brain recordings, which according to students is an immensely fascinating observation regarding how brain processes emanating from neurons, which generate brain waves visible by the aid of CT scans.

Though Neumann utilizes information from other already done and proved studies, his results have supported his hypothesis. This is evident from the manner in which the brain develops varied processes or workings contrary to how it would have done prior to the alterations imposed. For instance, the evidence that involves the injection of chemicals intentionally or taking alcohol, which disrupts the mind yielding to warped thinking or losing one’s memory.  The study’s theoretical implications encompass the students appreciating the relationships between biological mechanisms and human behavior. This will be of benefit to students who are undertaking psychology, scientific and related studies that entail unveiling certain behaviors that are evident among diverse individuals.  In addition, this study will also stimulate interest among the students to study intensively about brain processes. This will help them have a deeper understanding of biological mechanisms and humanity’s conduct, besides the logical appreciation that they normally learn from alcohol effects. The knowledge will be useful to students studying clinical psychology especially in executing their duties where mental predicaments would require pharmacological treatment.

However, despite Neumann having utilized other sources in explaining the argument, some scholars may disagree with the study. Because the content does not emanate from the first-hand investigation but has relied too much on others’ information. Additionally, the study is not always perfect, and in some instances, it may involve assumptions, which this author might have carried forward untrue facts. Consequently, implying that the information provided might not all be reliable, contrary to what Neumann presents it scientifically and states is useful to students and professionals whose work entails dealing with mental predicaments.