Who Is Responsible to Make Sure That the Foreign Policy Surrounded the US is Followed - Essay Example

FOREIGN POLICY REVIEW By (Name) The Name of the Class (Course) Professor (Tutor) The Name of the School (University) The City and State where it is located The Date Foreign Policy Review Introduction to the US Policy The foreign policy of the US pre-set standards on how it will relate with other nations. AS such, it is possible for the US TO SET STANDARDS on how it will connect with other foreign governments, corporations and individual citizens need to establish what the foreign policy is about especially considering what the United States is capable of accomplishing with other nations. The main body responsible for the carrying out of departmental affairs of the US is the United States Department of State (Yetiv, 2011). The foreign policy is meant to ensure that the US can build and sustain a more democratic, prosperous and secure future that is for the benefit of the American citizens as well as the American people. Research questions 1. Who is responsible to make sure that the foreign policy surrounded g the US is followed? 2. Who is responsible for the negotiating of treaties with the foreign nations? 3. Who is the authority over the armed US forces about the foreign policy have to do with the various battles? 4. What are the strategies that are needed to make sure that the US follows the US policies in an upright manner following all the rules and regulations? An overview o the historical aspect of the US system shows that it has evolved from what is known as non-interventionism that was entirely affected mainly in World War 1. The US policy has also been impacted by the shift in the radical ideas that show a change from being an idealist to a realist. Most researchers, however, tend to agree that it is vital to comprehend that making of the foreign policy is not easy and requires the attention of some of the most influential people in the government (Latham, 2011). The study detailing the making of the US Foreign policy is crucial as it also helps to understand exactly how the foreign agenda works. There is the question of who are the most influential players in the development of the US foreign policy. Some of the most prominent figures that affect the US foreign policy are the president and the Secretary of the state as well as the National Security Advisor. Other influential officers that change the foreign policy are the National Security Council and head of Secretary of State. Another issue that is relevant to the development of the US policy and what are the main concepts that lead to achieving of the US different goals. The two most important players dealing with the US foreign policy are the President and Secretary of State. It is vital to understand that the two personnel need to consider the main issues that affect foreign policy (Önis, 2011). Another department in the US that is also influential is the Secretary of Defense that adds to the added dimension of the review relevant to the national security questions. The implementation of the foreign policy is a result of an accrued system of workers who need a system that integrates the activities of all the members of the group. The United States national interest is usually observed because of the reasoning of a particular State. As such, it typically consists of a country’s goals further as ambitions no matter whether or not it is economic, cultural and military. Additional considerably, America’s national interest is inherently applied to the peacekeeping beneath that the pursuit of national interest is prime particularly once managing a realist faculty. The United States of America ought to follow the realist as against the visionary. This can be because of the very fact that the concept will influence the real problems and at per with the recent contemporaneousness ideas (Pillar, 2011). The visionary solely believes that solely the thoughts do matter no matter the prevailing world. Significantly, such words do not have real that means within the year 2007 however the historians still build use of them. The two theoretical forces that Krauthammer will see as convergence are unit democratization and Idealism. Apparently, the policy did press for democratization. However, Krauthammer argues that these area unit individuals do not have any roots within the neo-conservatism. What is more, he claims that those that look for foreign policies area unit realists by temperament and this has caused many acts of realism like Sep 11 terror attack. Such actions have caused Americans to note the instability relating to the idealism theory.  According to (), the term polarity will mean Associate in nursing uncontrolled new Dark Age. He continues to assert that it is Associate in the Nursing era of warning the empires further because of the spiritual zealotry of their downfall (Malamud, 2011). This can be in lightweight of the very fact that economic plunder further as pillage on regions thought of as forgotten has occurred as they are featured by economic stagnation. As such, it will represent an additional dangerous world condition. Multi-polarity is that the existence of the many fragmented powers whereas unit and bi-polarity suggests that various and 2fragmented powers. Considering Parent’s argument, I afflict the statement because of the very fact that the difference of any policy ought to be analyzed properly. Selfa’s theory will disagree with Krauthammer, as contrary to the beliefs, the new neuron realists have not abandoned their realism ideas. (Milner. and Tingley, 2013) was objecting the very fact that loads of former President Bush's directors were neuron and had no real backgrounds. Krauthammer’s theory was stronger. Considering Burn’s documentary, it becomes rather apparently clear that what is at the guts of National Security 2006 was conformity the doctrines regarding the U.S.A. military veterans. Yes, the Obama administration ought to continue with this strategy. Globalization in North America The significance of bodies corresponding to the world organization, IMF, World Bank is guaranteeing that there is unity among the nations internationally as the way of operating for peace further because of the development (Nye et al, 2012). The U.S.A. had a very important role in the creation of those establishments. Apparently, the U.S.A. is taken into account as a land and will there be disagreements at intervals the member states, as a state, it ought to be able to maintain international peace. Considering the duties that the rich countries needed to meet are units many. As an instance, they ought to ensure that the impoverished nation’s area unit granted funds by freelance bodies like World Bank and United Nations agency. Additionally, they are expected to confirm that basic desires like food and water are accessible for the nationals living within the poor nations. There is no valid rationalization which might be accustomed justify the enormous gulf between the made and developing nations. However, for a rustic to be poor, there should be some corruption within the supposed governments. As such, numerous reasons hinder the success of the countries. Parenthetically, there is corruption and political instability intimate in such countries (Gordon, 2012). The causes of revolutions are in the main the ideas of globalization. This can be thanks to the fact that globalization will inherently improve rustic economically, socially and in the main regarding technology. This often leads to frustrations likewise as political instability once the capital meant for globalization is ill-used thanks to corruption and self-loving functions (Cox and Stokes, 2012). The United States of America will act because it is the largest supplier of currency. Considering the NIEO demands, the foremost vital are that the globalization and autonomy requirements. In some countries, the globalization side has been consummated, however; the side of freedom has been neglected. After examining the modern faith views done by James author, I accept as true with this notion. Faith remains a reliable tool which will be accustomed persuade the international leaders. Jihad is delineated as a big study of Muslims. Additionally, the Muslims do use the word once relating the three ideas of struggle. For example, there is the battle for the upkeep of religion, the struggle of protecting the followers of Islam and eventually defend the Islam community. McWorld is mostly a term that is employed to explain the unfolding of restaurants referred to as McDonalds as one of the facets of globalization (Saideman, 2012). U. s. of America represents McWorld. Considering the four imperatives of McWorld, I did discover that they are not extremely compatible with Jihad forces. A Muslim would undoubtedly object to science and modernism, as Jihad will force them to reject the thought of fashion.  Considering the varied reasons to check integrations, they are many. As an example, it is vital because it advocates the legislation that will apparently favor the drop-off of violence against the women. Considering the difficulty of whether or not they conflict with the finding out of goals and peace, the varied reasons to check international violence do not necessary conflict with the supposed theory. The race theory will appear to be the best rationalization to explain the origin of wars. This can be thanks to the very fact that it has seen as a contest of two or many parties on World Health Organization has the simplest defense force and everyone parties to see World Health Organization has the first firearms. As such, the nations can turn out to be a terribly superior military technology and can use a specific nation that is impertinent and retaliates, which can cause the different government to conjointly fire back.  The arms treaties have not lessened the stress gift within the world. This can be thanks to most of the leaders being very Teflon and self-absorbed. The complexities that are related to domestic political support are led to by the leaders of the supposed countries being non-cooperative. As such, the high military budgets are not even (Milner. and Tingley, 2013).  I feel that the foreign and defense policies ought to be developed upon the accord oral communication to safeguard their accumulation. Considering the Klare interview, it has of significance to notice that his argument relies on the conflict regardless of the consequences it is on the resources offered. Describing Henry Martin Robert Kaplan as fashionable contemporary} realist is thanks to the very fact that his argument relies on the fashionable resources of the country that has modern machinery. Considering the alleged association between the height oil and Sep Sept. 11 attacks, the attack did occur on time once there was a depletion of world’s oil reserves notably within member countries. The tragedy of the commons is delineating as a quandary that will arise from a state of affairs that has multiple people United Nations agency ordinarily act severally. As such, it will function as a figure for the fate of the world that apparently will state that the freelance thinking can result in the shortage of unity among the nations. Considering the difficulty of what will account for the world’s population explosion, I even have to contemplate the underdeveloped countries that apparently have the best numbers of residents. Most of the national’s area unit apparently idle and necessitous in nature. The results of that area unit fatal intrinsically a nation is going to be lacking behind technologically, socially likewise as virtuously.  Apparently, the relation of the world’s environmental issues happens regarding the eco-system. Each nation will possess associate eco-system that apparently wants correct taking care of and maintenance. As such, one cannot help but be optimistic concerning the aptitude of humanity to beat these challenges because of the very fact that they are doing not perceptive to utilize the out there resources. Personally, nobody ought to have today money for pollution. As such, folks must not tolerate any level of contamination, but those that own land and property must not be allowed to exercise what they require as they abuse those supposed lands. Heating managing experiences variations in management as each leader encompasses an entirely different type of governance (Posen, 2013). The issues ought to handle by international leaders United Nations agency will not be biased. Apparently, a capitalist can argue in a very up to date manner whereas a socialist is going to be certain by ethical codes. My position on the matter is that there the capitalist ought to be authorized a lot of considerably, Hawkins’s plan is not realistic and the notion of free market environmentalism. The concepts that area unit conferred by the area documentary unit at per with the human demands of ecological systems globally. Americans will adopt the answer of protective their environments as most of the renewable resources return from the world. The untied economic process proponents claim that because of the shortage of industrial process within the poor nations, it's become apparently clear that this film will influence one completely and that I am currently prompted to give one thing for the poor. As seen in the paper, it is crucial for the US to understand that achieving that efficacy and efficiency are because of the strategies put in place by the governing committee. The United States aims to have the best foreign relations since it relies on very many countries for their exports and many countries rely on the prowess of the US for their imports. As such, both parties have little choice but to come to an amicable solution. Bibliography Yetiv, S.A., 2011. Explaining foreign policy: US decision-making in the Gulf Wars. JHU Press. Latham, M.E., 2011. Cornell University Press. Önis, Z., 2011. Multiple Faces of the" New" Turkish Foreign Policy: Underlying Dynamics and a Critique. Insight Turkey, 13(1), p.47. Pillar, P.R., 2011. Intelligence and US foreign policy: Iraq, 9/11, and misguided reform. Columbia University Press. Malamud, A., 2011. A leader without followers? The growing divergence between the regional and global performance of Brazilian foreign policy. Latin American Politics and Society, 53(3), pp.1-24. Nye Jr, J.S., Rachman, G., Mead, W.R., Mearsheimer, J., Walt, S., Feaver, P.D., Gelpi, C., Berinsky, A.J., Nincic, M., Nelson, M. and Fisher, L., 2012.The domestic sources of American foreign policy: insights and evidence. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. Gordon, P.H., 2012. Europe's uncommon foreign policy. Cox, M. and Stokes, D., 2012. US foreign policy. Oxford University Press. Taffet, J., 2012. Foreign aid as foreign policy: the Alliance for Progress in Latin America. Routledge. Saideman, S.M., 2012. The ties that divide: Ethnic politics, foreign policy, and international conflict. Columbia University Press. Mead, W.R., 2013. Special providence: American foreign policy and how it changed the world. Routledge. Milner, H.V. and Tingley, D., 2013. The choice for multilateralism: Foreign aid and American foreign policy. The Review of International Organizations, 8(3), pp.313-341. Posen, B.R., 2013. Pull back: The case of a less activist foreign policy.Foreign Aff., 92, p.116. Read More