The Duty of the American Government - Essay Example

Foreign Policy It is asserted in the American psyche that we all be prepared at all times for intimidation from abroad. This has always impelled Americans to put in place new measures for undeviating high-level cooperation between the civilian and military branches of the government. After the 9/11 attacks persuaded American of the astuteness of these arguments. The United States can in no way again afford to let down its guard. After these attacks, the United States needed new apparatus for the gathering and cooperation of foreign intelligent and, most importantly new mechanisms for seamless collaboration between representatives of the military and civilian agencies involved in foreign defense affairs. It is the duty of the American government to take care of the welfare of all its citizens across the globe. But of late, the rebel insurgent SUPA of Atropa has beset the formal government, with the support of the support of neighboring country. According to intelligent report, the rebel insurgents plan to attack the American Embassy and the headquarters of the American cooperation. This is a crucial matter that needs to be treated with strong seriousness that it deserves (Walt 30-50). As the United States Nation Security advisor, I enjoy substantial independent over the national security bureaucracy. The National Security Act rightly so grants me the power to principally assist you as the President of United States if America in all matters pertaining to the national security. Yet still, for this mission to be wholly successful, it will require a top notch voluntary collaboration among the powerful agencies responsible for foreign and defense. I reassure you that strategic investigation has been carried out in Atropia. The National Security Council has dished out input; by way of doing this it has elicited more compelling concept. My department has critically questioned into the details of the end of state, and looked at particular military role in restoring peace and stability in Atropia. I have considered forthcoming inquiring whether or not the risks involved are completely understood. The other option would be taking a military action without declaring a war. There will be integrating cruise missiles with American soldiers. This will involve taking out military plans. However, it may take time to create enactment areas and rescue teams before U.S. personnel are placed in the country. The success of the military is hence going to be boosted by the presence of CIA intelligent that will have carried covert investigation within the rebel insurgent territories. It will be imperative that your lead the administration in approving several intelligent orders and increase funding for human intelligence sources so that the CIA can carry out underground operations against the insurgent operations (Taft 40-40). This will provide important intelligence about the insurgent rebels and their base in Atropia. The army will put numerous Special Forces units on the ground that will help in combating the enemy. The people of Atropia will assist the army since they are well aware of the territory, and because they have scores to settle with the rebels. But if this will prove to be quite ineffectual, important numbers of United States troops will be put on the ground. This will be done so with a view to Americanizing the soil war (Taft 70-80). After emergency planning with your advisors, calling in airstrikes when the battle is engaged will be another action. The rebel insurgent territory will receive heavy and accurate shelling using the most refined guided mechanisms in the world. With all these sophisticated battle technology, it will be particularly easy to rid Atropia of the rebel insurgents. Therefore, you will be required to pattern your cabinet into an effectual consultative instrument for the conduct of the war and demonstrate your leadership style. Furthermore, it will require you to be extremely decisive as well as pragmatic by all standards. The interagency process will involve throughout the military (Eaton 110-115). The military is going to provide a critical multiplier. Additionally, their involvement in the interagency process will make it more effectual and ensure that the military influence is felt at the table. Conversely, the officers may also be compelled to teach the interagency community about the military abilities and, more significantly about the limitation of force (Cox 100-120). American premeditated traditions holds that military force is the last alternative (Trefil 60-89). As Americans, we are contented with using power until the other tools of national power, economic, ambassadorial, political and informational, have been manipulated. However, U.S. will use force that has less potential of expansive loss of life and destruction. In this context, this will reflect wise statesmanship. The force ought to be an ordinary instrument of policy. The nation will be required to strike preemptively with a view to defeating other means. A fruitful interagency process means that, it will solely depend on the trust among the participant, and increasing trust relies on thoughtful and a willingness to help move the process along. In your capacity, you have a great responsibility is encouraging the personnel that will be dispatched to Atropia. A close interdependent relationship among economic, military, diplomatic tools will be substantial (Foster 234-235). In this context, these tools will make America enjoy a good measure of order and stability in Atropia. I strongly believe that these synergisms will be routine. Furthermore, this synergism will occur throughout the gamut of relations, and it will hence be applied with visualization and assurance. However, you will only be compelled to use military action as opposed to declaring a state of war. The military action will ensure that there is peace and stability by working closely with the formal government of Atropia with a view to defeating the rebel insurgents. Conversely, there is a unanimous knowing that the decision to evade Atropia will eventually attract a string of criticism. Conversely, I’d like to bring to your attention that current predilections towards the use of force may materialize banishing military supremacy to a certain edge, which may on the whole be misunderstood. The American people may rebuke this mission as a wrong solution. Work Cited Cox, Michael. National Power and Interagency Process. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Print. Eaton, Derek. America’s Army: A model for Interagency Effectiveness. Connecticut: Praeger, 2008. Print. Foster, John. Piety, Pragmatism, and Power in U.S. Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Print. Taft, Robert. Interagency Condition. New York: Doubleday, 2001. Print. Trefil, James. The Politics of United Stated Foreign Policy. London: Routledge, 2005. Print Walt, Stephen. Special Providence: American Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1999. Print Read More