World Politics - Case Study Example

World politics Name Course Institution Date World Politics Introduction This paper presents a discussion of why the Europeans prefer sanctions against Iran in a bid to stop its nuclear Programme. The European Union (EU) stiffened sanctions upon Iran in an effort to convince Tehran to allow more international inquiry of the nuclear program as well as prevent a possible military disagreement (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). The foreign ministers of EU in Luxembourg approved extra control on business with Iran in addition to its transport, finance, and transport industries after an oil restriction and asset freeze of the central-bank (Sadedin, 2012). Additionally, the ministers froze the thirty four Iranian entities’ assets to obstruct the ability of the Iranian government to raise capital for its atomic scheme, which the EU and U.S claim is aimed at generating weapons (Baylis, et al, 2011). The fresh principles, which match restrictions by the U.S and are designed to close escapes in present European sanctions, come following international discussions on Iranian atomic acts produced little progress during recent months (Cebeci, 2011). The government of Israeli warned about a developing threat of Iran that is nuclear-armed (Global Sanctions on Iran Intensify, 2010). On the other hand, the Islamic state claims its atomic scheme is for national purposes. The EU stated that Iran should not underrate their determination. The EU has imposed constraints on collaboration with Iran within foreign trade, energy sectors, technologies and financial services, and prohibited reinsurance and insurance provision by insurers within member nations to Iran as well as companies that are owned by Iran. The EU in 23 January 2012 established an oil restriction on Iran, active from July, and freezing Iran’s central bank assets (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). The following month, Iran characteristically pre-empted the restriction by stopping sales to France and Britain (both nations had already nearly abolished their dependence on oil from Iran, and Europe entirely had almost halved its imports from Iran), even though some politicians from Iran called for abrupt sales close down to every EU state, in order to hurt nations such as Italy, Spain and Greece who were planning to get alternative means. Strict Conditions The EU banned transactions between the Iranian and European banks apart from those clearly approved earlier by state authorities under firm conditions; to make sure that the union’s financial institutions do not process finances that make contributions towards the nuclear program of Iran (Baylis, et al, 2011). In addition, restrictions were tightened on the central bank of Iran. The new restraint also entail a prohibition on exports of materials to Iran that may possibly be applied in ballistic and nuclear programs of Iran, specifically graphite, steel and aluminum, together with industrial software. Furthermore, the EU banned natural gas import from Iran and extended the present export bar on fundamental material for the Iranian gas, petrochemical and oil industries (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Bank Transactions The budget deficit of Iran might expand the most from at least the year 2007 because the Europe and U.S starve Iran concerning foreign currency through imposing a prohibition on oil which is the nation’s main export, as well as blocking other operations in euros and dollars. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran’s oil output which is the second leading producer within the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries following Saudi Arabia sagged from 2.85 million barrels to around 2.63 million barrels in a day (Sadedin, 2012). It was added that exports will still be down for the coming years. Moreover, the new restrictions imposed in the industry of shipping banned the vessels’ uses which are owned by the EU companies and citizens for storing or transporting Iranian petrochemical and oil products (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Classification and flagging services of the Iranian oil cargo and tankers vessels were banned and it was decided that nations of the EU will not support business with Iran via new interim export guarantees, credits or insurance. Sanctions’ effects The sanctions present hardships to Iran’s $352 billion, economy that is oil dominated (Sadedin, 2012). The Iranian Central Bank published data that showed a declining tendency within the Iranian exports’ share from products of oil (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Sanctions have actually had a considerable unwanted impact on the nuclear program of Iran through making it tougher to obtain specialized equipment and materials required for the plan. The economic and social impacts of sanctions have been severe as well, described as brutal (Sadedin, 2012). The foreign minister of Iran Ali Akhbar Salehi admitted that sanctions have impacts. As a result, China has turned out to be the remaining Iran’s leading trading partner (Baylis, et al, 2011). Sanctions have decreased access of Iran to products required for the sectors of energy and oil, prompting several companies of oil to leave Iran, and bringing about a decline within oil production because of decreased contact to technologies required to enhance their efficiency (Posch, 2007). It is claimed that Iran might be yearly losing a total of $60 billion within energy investment (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Several global companies have been hesitant to trade with Iran since they may not access greater Western markets. In addition to controlling export markets, sanctions have decreased oil income in Iran by raising the expenses of sending back revenues in compound means that bypass the sanctions (Baylis, et al, 2011). The effects of sanctions entail costly essential goods for citizens in Iran, as well as an aging and progressively more unsafe public aircraft fleet. It is argued that the global arms restriction in opposition to Iran is gradually decreasing Iran’s military abilities, greatly because of its reliance on Chinese and Russian military aid (Hanau, 2010). The only alternative is to get compensatory measures that require more money and time, and which in essence are less helpful. Sanctions stiffened further when leading supertanker organizations stated they would cease loading cargo from Iran (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Prior endeavors to decrease oil income in Iran failed since various vessels are frequently managed by organizations outside the EU and the U.S; on the other hand, EU measures in January expanded the prohibition to ship insurance (Sadedin, 2012). The insurance prohibition will have effect on 95 percent of the entire tanker fleet since their insurance is within the rules managed by the European law. After the completion of business ban, Iran was left struggling to get a purchaser for almost a quarter of the yearly oil exports (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Iran has sought to handle the effect of global sanctions and restrict outflows of capital through promotion of a resistance economy, substituting imports with local goods and forbidding luxury imports like mobile phones and computers (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). This is expected to result in a raise of smuggling, since people will get a means of smuggling in what consumers in Iran want (Sadedin, 2012). To maintain imports of oil, Iran has in addition provided local cover for tankers that ship Iranian oil. Iran hopes to sell a lot to Indian and Chinese refiners, even though such trials appear doubtful to be successful, specifically because China has been cutting back its imports of oil from Iran to half the previous level (Sadedin, 2012). Another sanctions’ effect, with respect to Iran’s disciplinary threat to shut the Hormuz Strait has resulted in Iraqi intention to open routes of export for the crude through Syria. After the Iranian banks that were blacklisted by EU were separated from the network of SWIFT banking, finance minister of Israeli claimed that Iran might find it harder to import products and export oil (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Iran would be obliged to accept just gold or cash, which is not possible when handling billions of dollars. Consequently, the economy of Iran might collapse. It is stated that sanctions were not only targeted at nuclear program in Iran and would go on albeit the nuclear disagreement was resolved. With the elevated economic pressure from Europe and U.S and a noticeable reduction of exports in oil, Iran builds a resistance economy and continuous imports of gold from Turkey (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Rationale behind sanctions During the war involving Iran and Iraq, Saddam Hussein was delisted by the administration of the U.S as a nation sponsor of terror with the intention that U.S may possibly send economic and military support to Iraq (Reus-Smit & Snidal, 2008). Surprisingly, the people of Iran do not embrace a united bitterness against the people of America for its administration‘s aid of Iraq in the course of the Iraq-Iran War. Actually, following the hijackings in September 11th, a lot of Iranians took part in vigils supporting the casualties in 2001 (Hanau, 2010). The relations of Iranian-European Union have been pulled in the start of 2010s by the disagreement about the nuclear program in Iran. The EU together with the U.S have generally imposed sanctions not in favor of Iran over the controversy surrounding the nuclear program in Iran. These sanctions, illustrated as the harsh sanctions inflicted against any nation by the officials in European were last reinforced at the close of 2012 by the Council of EU (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Sanctions are not substitute for actual diplomacy Iran is basically the geographic neighbor of EU. Individual member state of EU has closer cultural and economic connections with Iran compared with the U.S. In case the EU hopes to have a consequential role within the Middle East, on Arab-Israeli difference, on Syria, on the rising tension involving Iran and the Gulf governments, it ought to construct relations with every significant actor, not excluding Iran (Global Sanctions on Iran Intensify, 2010). In case the EU desires to have influence on Iran’s terrible situation of human rights, it must open discussion on rights, as a constituent of a fresh strategic framework. The EU does not have a problem with the US taking the lead because they both center on human rights and non-proliferation of nuclear (Cebeci, 2011). Deeper relations between Iran and EU including the alternative of instituting an embassy of EU in Tehran would raise its significance as a strategic associate for US as well as E3+3 chair (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). The EU’s objective remains to accomplish an inclusive, negotiated, lasting resolution which would create global confidence within the completely peaceful characteristic of Iranian program of nuclear, while respecting legitimate right of Iran to the diplomatic utilization of nuclear energy in the Non Proliferation Treaty (Reus-Smit & Snidal, 2008). Today’s resolutions target ballistic and nuclear programmes in Iran and the Iranian government’s returns for these schemes. They are intended to convince Iran to constructively engage through serious negotiation as well as addressing the global community’s concern (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Sanctions are basically not targeted at the people of Iran. Controversy Controversies have come up among the global community. For instance, at the start of 2012, Russia claimed that it may reflect on direct threats toward security to incorporate activities of war not in favor of Iran, with its closeness to the territory of Russia (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). The same year, the foreign minister representing Russia, cautioned that Iranian attack would bring about an upheaval. He claimed that sanctions are targeting to strangle the Iran’s economy and that this would cause a lot of division toward western countries, and possibly incite a harmful recourse. In case actions to decrease the nuclear war threat are considered, they must not embrace inciting counterparts to any possible conflict (Sadedin, 2012). Additional argument is about the actuality that there is no existence of sufficient evidence to establish a fair concern on the presence of development of nuclear weapon in Iran, increasing questions about sanctions’ warrant (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). From the report released in the close of 2011, the IAEA has hence not established any proof to the presence of nuclear weapons within Iran (Sadedin, 2012). With this in mind, assumption has come up about whether western countries are still on the similar path which was considered for Iraq, going into another phase of war about assumptions of mass destruction weapons that have not been proofed to exist (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). In case this is considered, claims about nuclear weapon may possibly be another trial at maintaining management of oil concerns. Conclusion In conclusion, the paper has discussed various issues with respect to why Europeans prefer sanctions against Iran in a bid to stop its nuclear programme. The European organization was obliged to disconnect nearly thirty banks in Iran, including the nation’s federal bank, from its system after EU prohibition on trading with the organizations. Iran has gone through progressively harder sanctions from both the EU and the U.S. It is noted that the oil exports from Iran have reduced significantly over the previous year due to sanctions, and Iran has been distressed by the fall in exports of oil and the rejection of various global banks to create deals because of sanctions. That outcome has activated a sharp decline in the currency of Iran, and Iran has been forced to curtail on imports. Iran prohibited imports of nearly 2,000 luxury goods, including laptops, cars and mobile phones, seeking to protect foreign currency. Therefore authorities have categorized imports into ten groups grounded on how important they are perceived to be, and hence will offer importers with lots of dollars at a rate that is subsidized to buy essential commodities. To save lots of dollars for basic products during the course of deteriorating sanctions, Iran has prohibited importation of some goods that are considered luxury including mobile phones and cars that are foreign made. Reference list Baylis, J., Smith, & Owens, P, 2011, The Globalization of World Politics: an Introduction to International Relations (5th ed), New York: Oxford University Press. Cebeci, M, 2011, Issues in EU and US foreign policy, Lanham, Md: Lexington Books. Global Sanctions on Iran Intensify: The United States and the European Union expanded their sanctions on Iran, seeking to pressure Iran to comply with UN Security Council resolutions by pinching its economy, 2010, Arms Control Today : a Publication of the Arms Control Association, 40, 7, 27-31. Hanau, SR, 2010, European Union discourses and practices on the Iranian nuclear programme. European Security, 19, 3, 467-489. Katzman, K., & Library of Congress, 2012, Iran sanctions, Washington, D.C: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. Posch, W, 2007, The European Union and Iran: What Next?, The International Spectator, 42, 4, 537-543. Reus-Smit, C., & Snidal, D, 2008, The Oxford handbook of international relations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Sadedin, S, 2012, Effect of European union's sanctions on Iran and assessing trends in currency value, European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, 55, 121-122. Read More

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) reported that Iran’s oil output which is the second leading producer within the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries following Saudi Arabia sagged from 2.85 million barrels to around 2.63 million barrels in a day (Sadedin, 2012). It was added that exports will still be down for the coming years. Moreover, the new restrictions imposed in the industry of shipping banned the vessels’ uses which are owned by the EU companies and citizens for storing or transporting Iranian petrochemical and oil products (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012).

Classification and flagging services of the Iranian oil cargo and tankers vessels were banned and it was decided that nations of the EU will not support business with Iran via new interim export guarantees, credits or insurance. Sanctions’ effects The sanctions present hardships to Iran’s $352 billion, economy that is oil dominated (Sadedin, 2012). The Iranian Central Bank published data that showed a declining tendency within the Iranian exports’ share from products of oil (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012).

Sanctions have actually had a considerable unwanted impact on the nuclear program of Iran through making it tougher to obtain specialized equipment and materials required for the plan. The economic and social impacts of sanctions have been severe as well, described as brutal (Sadedin, 2012). The foreign minister of Iran Ali Akhbar Salehi admitted that sanctions have impacts. As a result, China has turned out to be the remaining Iran’s leading trading partner (Baylis, et al, 2011). Sanctions have decreased access of Iran to products required for the sectors of energy and oil, prompting several companies of oil to leave Iran, and bringing about a decline within oil production because of decreased contact to technologies required to enhance their efficiency (Posch, 2007).

It is claimed that Iran might be yearly losing a total of $60 billion within energy investment (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Several global companies have been hesitant to trade with Iran since they may not access greater Western markets. In addition to controlling export markets, sanctions have decreased oil income in Iran by raising the expenses of sending back revenues in compound means that bypass the sanctions (Baylis, et al, 2011). The effects of sanctions entail costly essential goods for citizens in Iran, as well as an aging and progressively more unsafe public aircraft fleet.

It is argued that the global arms restriction in opposition to Iran is gradually decreasing Iran’s military abilities, greatly because of its reliance on Chinese and Russian military aid (Hanau, 2010). The only alternative is to get compensatory measures that require more money and time, and which in essence are less helpful. Sanctions stiffened further when leading supertanker organizations stated they would cease loading cargo from Iran (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Prior endeavors to decrease oil income in Iran failed since various vessels are frequently managed by organizations outside the EU and the U.

S; on the other hand, EU measures in January expanded the prohibition to ship insurance (Sadedin, 2012). The insurance prohibition will have effect on 95 percent of the entire tanker fleet since their insurance is within the rules managed by the European law. After the completion of business ban, Iran was left struggling to get a purchaser for almost a quarter of the yearly oil exports (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012). Iran has sought to handle the effect of global sanctions and restrict outflows of capital through promotion of a resistance economy, substituting imports with local goods and forbidding luxury imports like mobile phones and computers (Katzman & Library of Congress, 2012).

This is expected to result in a raise of smuggling, since people will get a means of smuggling in what consumers in Iran want (Sadedin, 2012). To maintain imports of oil, Iran has in addition provided local cover for tankers that ship Iranian oil.

Read More