International Relations Of The USA And Pakistan - Assignment Example

International Relations Of The USA And Pakistan The five strongest pros to cut off aid in Pakistan are as follows The state of Pakistan over the years has been dreadful. The United States should spend within their territory rather than over third world countries. Aid programs that previously prevailed failed terribly. Lack of security in Pakistan Pakistan restricted NATO supply The five strongest cons to cut off aid in Pakistan The relationship with Pakistan will be dreadful. Diplomats have favored such aid programs in Pakistan To support the war against the terrorism Pakistan is a very strong ally Past aids have failed. Firstly I believe that in Pakistan a lot has been done previously and a lot is still in progress to bring about sustainability within the state but still the condition in Pakistan has been declining with time from bad to worse. The condition of Pakistan is very pathetic and there isn’t much hope for it to improve therefore investing in Pakistan is a waste of money. Another reason to stop aid in Pakistan is that if the aid is stopped then the same amount of money can be spent to bring about prosperity in USA. The USAID program that is responsible to bring about change in Pakistan and to provide aid is believed to have certain personal reasons which have a political background. There are short of any expertise and no interest is paid on future therefore lack of long term programs and the only reason to carry it is the benefit it adds to the foreign policy. Therefore critics in the field of foreign policy believe that it is better to invest within USA than Pakistan. The aid that has been previously given in Iraq and Afghanistan has failed drastically. The United States believes that despite the aid programs have failed terribly but still there have been certain benefits by starting that program. This is the basic reason so as to why they are in favor of such programs but these benefits are not so enlarged and massive that such big amounts are spent on such a cause. Past efforts have failed rampantly but they have made the current policies stronger and better. Personally I believe that these programs need to stop because they aren't of much help what so ever. (Cordesman, 65) Security is one of the biggest concerns that prevail in Pakistan recently. Pakistan itself in a state of instability therefore propagating aid within Pakistan is quite difficult. In recent times no security has been provided to the workers who are responsible to provide such help. Many have been kidnapped, brutally killed or vanished during their course of service in Pakistan. 150 workers in the year 2008 were victims of serious assault in Pakistan1. Another issue is that the native of Pakistan because of certain religious drilling in them believe that if they accept this aid then they might support USA which apparently the root of all evil therefore they resist the aid provided to them and eventually hurting the workers who are there for their help. (Reid, Guardian) Lastly Pakistan although being in a state of utter oppression still showed the courage to put a ban on the NATO supplies.2 This act caused major inconvenience to America despite of being in debt such act shows their thanklessness and insecurity towards USA. "Pakistan has temporarily stopped NATO supply trucks crossing its northwestern border into Afghanistan over security concerns due to fears of attacks." (Express Tribune) The five strongest cons so as to why USA should not cut on aid in Pakistan are It is estimated that almost more than 80 % of the supplies that are sent to the NATO troops is through the route between Pakistan and Afghanistan. Therefore cutting on aid might affect this. Initially a ban has been put if it continues this way then the NATO troops will suffer tremendously.3 (Bergen, 28, Afghanistan: Mission Impossible?) The poverty that is in Pakistan is mainly because of the political instability that prevails there and if aid is restricted then the condition might just worsen. The small amount of aid that USA provides apparently has a drastic impact on the current state of Pakistan. Various diplomats and ambassadors seeking to bring about peace within Pakistan believe that cutting off on aid will affect the present relations between the two countries. Maleeha Lodhi who is an ambassador of Pakistan in the US believes that restricting aid will make Pakistan an enemy of the US. This will not be in favor of the US as they require the help of Pakistan to combat the evil forces of Al Qaeda. Clinton in her speech previously mentioned that the aid in Pakistan has already been cut short and because of this they have faced a serious drawback because Pakistan has raised the fee to access the land routes for NATO. Therefore any more such act might cause more serious dents. (Dawn News) Pakistan is a very important ally of US.4 It is an active participant of the war against terrorism and throughout the time has supported the United States despite it has faced serious setbacks. (Touqir, 2) Drone attacks have completely devastated the state of Pakistan and have caused immense insecurity within the citizens. Still Pakistan is supporting the US to fight off terrorism. Many soldiers have lost their life in benefit of the cause. Pakistan supports the US policies and has been an active participant in overcoming the Talibanization etc. If Pakistan is cooperating so much then cutting their aid might just worsen the situation making them pure enemies. The purpose of developing foreign policies is to make relations better within states and a basic point in them is the propagation of aids. Personally I believe that despite there are drawbacks for the US to cut off aid in Pakistan but still they should because this money would rather help in prospering the USA. And the benefits of cutting on the aid are fairly more than the drawbacks. Top of Form Bottom of Form Read More