Appropriate Leader for Arabic People - Term Paper Example

Outline Thesis ment: Arabic people should keep going with their revolutions to get their freedom and find solutions for social problems and chose appropriate leader. I_ Social problems: Arabic people want to find solutions for the social issues. A/ Health problems B/ Education problems C/ Economic problems II _Freedom: Arabic people need their freedom which is the right for human beings. A/Freedom in society. B/ Freedom speech. C/ freedom in media. III_ Appropriate leader: They want to be subordinate by appropriate person. A/Sympathetic leader. B/Wise leader. C/equitable. IIII_Counter Argument: The Arabic revolutions will destroy the Middle East. A/ spread the civil wars. B/ weaken the economy . ALHAYDAR1 When the people cannot be patient with injustice which is from the unjust governments, they will shout and ask for their rights. People who feel injustice can do the change in their communities. Since the past until now the revolutions have changed many countries. In these days, we are seeing people in the Middle East who have worked to change their government. People who demonstrated in Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Yemen lived under oppression. Therefore, they objected to find better life. Even if they encountered many obstacles, they did not stop. In fact, unjust governments killed many people, but citizens continued to try make other people hear their voices. Most demanded that they need to make their countries better places for the next generations, have freedom, and find solutions for many issues. In addition, chose the appropriate person to lead their countries. The revolution of 2011 in the Middle East improved the economic, political and social situations for the citizens of Egypt, Libya, Tunisian, and Yemen. People in the Middle East should continue their revolutions to find solutions for the social issues, get their freedom, and chose the appropriate leader. The most common social problems in the Middle East are concentrated on three major fields which are economy, health and education. In fact, the economy in these countries is almost non-existent. The governments of these countries are dependent on helping that is giving by other countries. Even if, they have a good economy as agriculture and manpower, sources of oil and gas. For instance, according to Egypt news on the economic front Egypt did not feel of the change after the revolution that happened in January 25 /2011. The tourism was affected, but the other felids were not. Gas and oil sales, also Suez Canal revenues and remittances from ALHAYDAR2 workers abroad — are either stable or growing, according to Central Bank figures(Egypt news). Most of the business men who worked in that time when Mubarak was the president were a cause for the weaken economy and corruption. That means Egypt has suitable economy because of oil production. The second criticism of these governments is health. Health care in most of the Middle East governments is unimportant. Many diseases that spread in the Middle East are because of neglect. Ministries of health are not able to protect humans from these illnesses. In addition, education is weak in the Middle East. According to Cheryl Benard, , in the past decades the people understood the importance of education in the Middle East, but the most important obstacle to citizens Career Opportunities The posts became missing in these countries, which led to frustration for people to learn. Also, the huge number of uneducated people is living in the Middle East (Benard). Freedom in the Middle East is a mirage the governments just talk about, but the citizens do not feel. The freedom of speech one of the most important right that citizens need, they want to say what they believe what they see. Even they tried to talk they could not. Furthermore, media freedom was leaded by the governments. Media publish what the governments want without caring of the citizens. Citizens in the Middle East live under injustice of governments; therefore, they present many martyrs as a cost for freedom. The revolutions that happened in the Middle East are totally successful because demonstrators have the same goals. AS what I side many martyrs were presented by demonstrators. ALHAYDAR3 Across the Arab world, tragic scenes unravel inspiring human struggle for freedom ? police shooting on peaceful protesters at random, massive deaths, degradation of human life, disruption of social and economic activities, and cries of ?Allah ?o- Akbar - God is Great? and ?La Illa ILLulaha - there is no god but God.? Unthinkable and unexpected as it was to the Arab neo-colonial ruling elite, mostly uneducated, devoid of reason and intellectual foresight and being unable to THINK right, to know and understand the concerns of the masses- the typical sinking behavior to blame others, not being able to see the authoritarian self in the mirror as the crux of the problems. The people?s revolutionary movements generate great deal of sensation and dramatic effects on the Western TV screens. Sometime the Western entertaining news media called it ?unrest? or ?uprising? but in reality the people?s movement for freedom from the yoke of imperialism.( Mahboob A. Khawaja). Even if the governments killed many of Arabic demonstrators they will continue their protests on the justice of their governments. One of the criticisms of the Arabic people in these five countries, was the presidents ignorance of how lead the countries. They just depend on foreign countries’s helping. Egypt as an example, according to the New York Times, Since 1979 the Untied Stats has helped Egypt government by sums of money up to 2 billion American dollars every year. In addition, according to the State Department, U.S. military aid to Egypt totals over $1.3 billion annually in a stream of funding known as Foreign Military Financing. The American officials say that the ALHAYDAR4 helping for the Egypt military makes the relationships between the two military strong(New York Times). That means not only Mubarak’s government depended on the United States on the economy, but also they depended on U.S.A to support the military that protects their country. So we can say the U.S.A government protected Egypt not the Egyptian’s military. Furthermore, the economy in Egypt is powered by the United States. The other point is that both Muammar Gaddafi and Ali Abdullah Salah had led their countries for a long time up to 40 years. According to the New York Times, Muammar Gaddafi was nervous and unjust in that time when he was the president of Libya for 42 years. Many demonstrators were killed by Muammar inside Libya and outside it. The demonstrators were so happy and they celebrated when he died(New York Times). Gaddafi in the beginning of the revolution said the real Libyans will not accept invasion and colonization. He continued we will fight until last soldier we have. Also about Salah they said ALI Abdullah Salah had been in the Yemen government for 33 years. In this long time the justice disappeared. Crimes and thefts were spread the government could not control the country(New York Times). In June 2011 demonstrators tried to kill Salah in assassination but he survived. The New York Times mention that the Libyans and Yemenis were not satisfied because the length of presidency and the dictatorship. Libyan demonstrators killed Gaddafi, but Yemenis could not kill Ali (New York Times). And now we have the case of Syria. Syria is currently now in a civil war according to several news outlets (BBC News 2012). The situation in Syria is not as easy to explain as the situations were in Libya, Egypt, or Tunisia. However, the same desires fuel the freedom fighters and the Free Syrian Army (FSA) to continue their fight against the Assad regime. Another factor that confuses the issue with Syria is the level of outside interference. In Libya, Tunisia, and Egypt there were outside forces at work but not to the level that is being seen currently in Syria. For instance, Iran, Russia, United States, and Turkey to name a few are daily backing their own political motives and because of that the work of the FSA and other freedom fighters is made more difficult. Because the FSA is being pulled so many ways and fighting more than one ideological enemy, it is difficult for it to recognize a central purpose and rally around that purpose. It is because of factors like these that the Syrian version of the Arab Spring is taking so long. If it were not for the level of outside interference in Syria that exists, it is this author’s belief that the FSA would have overthrown the Assad regime a very long time ago. Secondly, the Free Syrian Army is not only fighting internally with the Assad regime but also is fighting with elements within its own self. Although it is not uncommon for rebel forces to disagree concerning the direction of the opposition (for instance Libyan rebels disagreeing over which tribe would have more control over a given region or which tribe would be responsible for an assult), the situation in Syria is far worse. Rebels are splintered between several very distinct groups. This fact alone also helps explain why the revolution has not deposed Assad yet. For instance, some rebels in Syria do not wish to violently oppose the Assad regime. Firstly, because they believe it is basically a form of suicide to do so as Assad still has control of the military and police. Secondly, they believe that they are putting innocent men/women and children in harm’s way. Thirdly, they believe that their cause against Assad is stronger if they do not resort to violent opposition. There is also a contingent of fighters that wish to bring about a radical Islamist state upon the deposition of Assad and setting up the new Syrian government. This contingent, although included within the term “Free Syrian Army” acts almost entirely independent of the other and works to plan its own methods of attack and attempts to formulate the future of the FSA. It is this contingent of the FSA that frightens many would-be Western supporters of the FSA. Because of their fear of the rise of another radically Islamic state in the Middle East, many nations are remaining neutral in the conflict; choosing to quietly side with the devil they know rather than side with the unknown. The third group of people that are represented under the umbrella of the Free Syrian Army are those that wish only to violently oppose the Assad regime but do not want to inflict any further casualties on the military and police forces in the process. This group, perhaps more than any of the others, knows that whatever the outcome of the civil war, when it concludes Syrians of all backgrounds and different political ideologies must work together to rebuild what remains of their country. As such, this element of the opposition does not want to further fracture the already splintered groups within Syria but wants to maintain the revolution without spilling the blood of low-level security services who are merely working a job in order to provide for themselves and for their families. Even if the Arabic people know that the presidents of these countries were oppressive, dependent on the helping of other countries. A few of Arabic people say, the revolutions that had happened in the Middle East will have negative effects such as civil wars, thefts because of the ALHAYDAR5 weak system that will be after the old system. In addition, the economy will be affected when the citizen’s attention disappeared (New York Times). Many fields will stop as factories, malls, schools, companies, ministries. That means the Middle East countries will be in war situation and they will lose many of their people as a result of the wars that spread in the countries. On the contrary, every point of these points has a response. For people who against Arabic revolutions talked about civil wars and thefts, for sure when the revolutions had begun there is a time which is called (The transfer of power). The power will move from old government to the new government, so in this time which do not reach to long time a few of the citizens who are worse of other members in their communities. To clarify, they are horrid in their countries as a result of the old government, so they will be recompensed by the new government. Furthermore, all the countries fields will be work after this time. In the Middle East the economy is already weak, so it is not criticism appropriately on the revaluations. The victims who were killed by the Arabic governments in the revaluations considered themselves as a cost for the freedom and the living place for the next generations. For instance, French revaluations, the French revolutions started in May 1789 by States General. At the same year in March the French people attacked the Bastille prison. In October, Louis XVI and the Royal Family escaped form Versailles to Paris but they could not. A Legislative Assembly sat from October 1791 until September 1792 when the confederate governments of Austria, Holland, Prussia, and Sardinia invaded, but the king was killed by the new French government in January 21, 1793(Dived Cody). French a long time ago were killed by their king, but because they had a strong goals of their revolutions they could did it successfully. In these days, we all know that French one of the great country around the world with democratic system. They voting every several years to choose the great leader who can ALHAYDAR6 make their country better and better. In addition, French know is one of the countries who have a strong economy and great positions. Not only has a great place between the countries around the world, but also French support many countries in the Middle East. Therefore, Arabic people want to change their countries to be better country and place that can next generations live in it with their freedom and their rights. I think they will find that place because they have paid many martyrs to find their rights. However, there are those that believe the Arab Spring revolutions have done nothing but spread violence, proliferate weapons, encourage separatist groups, and further embolden the likes of al Qaeda and other known terrorist organizations to become more intimately involved in the political theater. For instance, Abdel-Hakim al-Hasidi, the Libyan rebel leader, has said jihadists who fought against allied troops in on the front lines in Afghanistan and Iraq are on the front lines of the battle against Muammar Gaddafis regime (Telegraph, 2011). This revelation that al Qaeda played a prominent role in the ousting of Gaddafi’s regime has led many to question whether the West should continue to support these revolutions. However, the question of support of these revolutions and/or military intervention on the part of Europe and/or the United States is not a question that is left up to the voters in these countries. It is a question that is left up to the policy makers and leadership. Secondly, the economic ramifications on the global economy is heavy. For instance, the time that it has taken to rebuild the damages to the infrastructure to the Libyan economy alone could take ten years as an optimistic timeframe. The oil production was all but halted during the civil war, public utilities remain in shambles, the ports need extensive repairs, the education system is yet to function to the level it was under Colonel Gaddafi, and free state-funded post-secondary education is no longer a reality. In short, the economic costs of the civil war both domestically and internationally are extremely high – not to mention the cost in lives; perhaps as many as 30,000 people lost their lives in the ensuing conflict in Libya alone (Huffington Post, 2011) To sum up, it is the belief of this author that the Arabic people should continue their revolutions and work to change their governments’ system. Although imperfect, these revolutions have at their core a central belief that the self-determination of the people is a far better system of government than the dictatorial rule of privileged elite. This right to self determination is one in which all people deserve to live under. It is fair to say in this instance that although there are many shortcomings of the Arab Spring revolutions, one should not expect that overnight all problems associated with a rapid change in governance would disappear. With the right among of time, with proper institutions, with a full and free democracy, and by guarding the new republics which they have fought so hard for and spilled their own blood for, the people of these respective nations will be able to work through the many obstacles that currently present themselves. They can get their freedom, find solutions for the social issues, and choose the appropriate presidents who can make their countries better and better. It is the hope of this author that the decision makers of these recently free countries look to France as a model of what their society might become if they correctly apply democracy, rule of law, respect for human rights, and social welfare. Although this change has taken the course of at least two hundred years, it is nonetheless a model society in which recently democratically organized countries can hope to ascribe. As a result of their hard work, continual evolution, and pure goals – France has become the nation that is today. Indeed, France has achieved its goals and they will surely continue to make their country a freer and better place to live with a long and great history of democratic reform. Bibliography Author’s Last Name, First Initial. (Date published) Title of Article. New York Times. Retrieved July 19, 2012, from www.newyorktimes.com/????????????????????? Ghattas, K. (2012, June 12). Syria in civil war, says UN official Herve Ladsous. BBC News. Retrieved July 19, 2012, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18417952 Laub, K. (2011, September 8). Libya: Estimated 30,000 Died In War; 4,000 Still Missing . Huffington Post. Retrieved July 19, 2012, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/08/libya-war-died_n_953456.html Swamee, P. (2011, March 25). Libyan rebel commander admits his fighters have al-Qaeda links. Telegraph. Retrieved July 19, 2012, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/libya/8407047/Libyan-rebel-commander-admits-his-fighters-have-al-Qaeda-links.html# Read More