Nobody downloaded yet

Did the possession of nuclear weapons prevent war in Europe after 1945 - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
In this essay, the author examines all those factors, which despite nuclear possession helped war prevention in Europe after 1945. The main question for discussion is what were the main reasons behind avoiding war and what were the consequences experienced by Europe in already indulging in war conduct…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.7% of users find it useful
Did the possession of nuclear weapons prevent war in Europe after 1945
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Did the possession of nuclear weapons prevent war in Europe after 1945"

Download file to see previous pages There is no doubt that presence of nuclear programs and weapons enabled Europe to take wise decisions after 1945. The best example of European ‘wise decisions’ is no nuclear war has taken place since 1945. If we talk about the nuclear battlefield in the context of British Government, we would analyse the British Army of the Rhine spent much time and effort in trying to imagine what such a battlefield might look like and in preparing to cope with it. The main reason was that British Government was in debt to the USA, due to which it reduced its armed forced to one million soldiers. Beside this, all European countries were aware of the haphazard of nuclear war, since the bombing of ‘Hiroshima’. During the 1950s and 1960s these efforts were taken very seriously, which involved two steps: possessing advanced nuclear weapons and visualising war with and without them. Of course war cannot be fought without them, which means war fought with nuclear weapons. ‘Hiroshima’ bombing is a sample view, which is still giving birth to the haphazard of a single nuclear bomb.
In the context of war at the strategic level the first response was to emphasise ‘counterforce’. Soviet weapons were the strategic targets and senior commanders still talked as though a nuclear war could be ‘won’. Then the danger of this approach dawned with the development of Soviet Union the means of delivering a massive blow against the United States, so the notion of 'riding out' a first strike and then delivering a counter-blow on what could only be empty silos and deserted bomber bases became highly unattractive. The result was a shift back to 'city-busting', holding the people rather than the weapons as hostages; 400 one-megaton weapons able to hit area targets would suffice. This totally amoral doctrine was dressed up under the term Mutual Assured Destruction and its appropriate acronym (MAD). The tactical counterpart to this change of heart took a further five years to mature. It came to be realised that large-scale assault on NATO, while still a deadly danger, was by no means the only or even the most likely contingency. (Barnaby & Holdstock, 2003, p. 39)

At that time the total nuclear stockpile of the United States, at its highest point, had an estimated explosive yield of some 9 billion tons of high explosive and the Soviet stockpile must have been much the same. In the 20 years from 1945 to 1965 nuclear warheads evolved to fill every possible ecological niche on the battlefield and in numbers far greater than any rational person could possibly have considered useful. (2003, p. ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Did the possession of nuclear weapons prevent war in Europe after 1945 Essay”, n.d.)
Did the possession of nuclear weapons prevent war in Europe after 1945 Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1528901-nuclear-war
(Did the Possession of Nuclear Weapons Prevent War in Europe After 1945 Essay)
Did the Possession of Nuclear Weapons Prevent War in Europe After 1945 Essay. https://studentshare.org/politics/1528901-nuclear-war.
“Did the Possession of Nuclear Weapons Prevent War in Europe After 1945 Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1528901-nuclear-war.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Did the possession of nuclear weapons prevent war in Europe after 1945

Nuclear Technology vs Nuclear Weapons

...developed. The nuclear warheads in the world today have the potential to wipe out the entire civilization as we know it. 95% of these weapons are owned by Russia and the US. Others are owned by France, UK, India, China, North Korea and Pakistan. In case of a civil war in any one of these nations, rival groups can use these weapons on each other. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission admits that there is a high risk of a disastrous meltdown in the US. The Commission did this after witnessing the Chernobyl disaster. In 2003, the United Nations estimated that over 15,000 people living in contaminated areas in Chernobyl had died...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Nuclear weapons

...by some nations for the sole purpose of intimidation so as to protect overseas interests and assists as said by Caldicott (2004, p.73). In this case, he argues that there is no way that any country or military power would use nuclear weapons against its own citizens, and then he goes on to state that some countries have enormous oversees interests. As a result, the legitimacy for having these nuclear weapons is to protect the country from any external acts of aggression by other nations, just as the tradition of war goes. Besides this, the argument of having a peaceful world that is free of threats to national insecurity is a new justification to the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Iran's nuclear possession

...is the contminted equipment tht Irn hd imported. Conclusions Current pper provided n overview of contemporry issues in Irn nucler power ccess. It ws rgued tht Irn does not hve proper gols to nucler possessions despite country's growing needs in electricity. Methods of preventing Irn from nucler prolifertion (deterring use, keeping Tehrn from deploying wepons, getting it to dismntle its nucler progrm, etc. tht ultimtely shpe Wshington diplomtic pproch to deling with the issue) should be nticipted. From the other side, the pper rgued tht Irn should be empowered to nucler ccess s the country requires providing more electricity for the growing number of locl citizens. ll in ll, US efforts to...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Nuclear Weapons and Nuclear Power

...disarmament: they cost around $200 million EACH to produce, and cost about a quarter of that to maintain and then dismantle. Each warhead must be looked after, as after all, we know it's hard for terrorists to make them, but how hard would it be to steal one And as I mentioned before, with countries like Iran looking to join the nuclear 'club', we don't know whether or not we can keep track of the new weapons being produced. During a nuclear war, if your country has nuclear arms, they will be the first to be attacked: France, UK, US, Russia, China, Israel, Pakistan, India, etc will all be wiped out within minutes of a...
10 Pages(2500 words)Book Report/Review

Nuclear Weapons

...Nuclear Weapons The right of sovereign nations to test, stockpile and deploy nuclear weapons has been the subject of much debate, treaties and resolutions since 1945 when the United States dropped ‘the bomb’ on Japan, an event which ended the lives of hundreds of thousands along with the Second World War. Today, five nations – the U.S., United Kingdom, Russia, China and France – are officially recognised as possessing nuclear weapons. Pakistan and India have tested nuclear weapons and it is not known if Israel possesses...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Dealing with Nuclear Weapons

...Dealing with Nuclear Weapons Institution: Course: Date due: Globalization is among the factors that affect the efforts of dealing with the spreading of nuclear weapons. In the transcript ‘The Business of the Bomb’, it is apparent that the existence of the global market helped Khan in spreading the nuclear weapons in several countries around the world. His efforts of marketing were very successful and he was able to provide the technology concerning nuclear weapons to other countries. It,...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

Nuclear Weapons

...and should not be seen as steps towards destabilizing the world or causing unnecessary harm to the world populations. Some people have argued that the nuclear weapons pose no threat to the world and they should therefore not be destroyed and the countries that are involved in the creation and development of the nuclear weapons should be allowed to proceed with the projects (Mueller par 3). Tentative Outline I. History of nuclear weapons A. Nuclear Weapons have existed for long time but the creation rate rose after the World War II B. Different countries have engaged in...
2 Pages(500 words)Thesis Proposal

Nuclear Weapons

...resolution strategy. Unlike before 1945 when nuclear weapons were built to be used in war, currently, many countries are building these weapons for national pride. Political leaders were building these weapons in order to earn the trust of the electorates. In addition, the countries felt that they matched their neighbours or allies after developing these weapons. For instance, Pakistan developed nuclear weapons because their neighbour India had them. The initial motive changed after the countries realizing the devastating effects of using these...
9 Pages(2250 words)Coursework

Europe after the Cold War

...Europe after the Cold War Introduction The Cold War had numerous effects on the past society as well as the current society for instance; Russia experiences a huge cut in military spending (Lieberman, 2010). The ramifications of this were huge since the military and industrial sectors had previously given employment to one out of every seven adults in the USSR. Therefore, the disintegration of the Soviets left a big part of the population across the entire former Union without any form of employment. The legacy of the Cold War persisted after the war was over through continually influencing global affairs....
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Nuclear Weapons

... opposition of Jews and Muslims is the reason why such disintegrated and always in war region must be strictly denied a right to possess any kind of massive scale weapon. Iran is most probably on the path to build a nuclear weapon but fortunately for the world USA and Iran not so long ago started to rebuild their relationships and so the peace process in nearest further could allow deleting Iran from the list of America’s enemies. Nevertheless nuclear weapon in the hands of even former enemy of USA is a risky situation. Unfortunately there isn’t any possible easy solution for such issues in nearest future so the best way is trying to maintain present status-quo.... Nuclear Weapon Nuclear...
2 Pages(500 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Did the possession of nuclear weapons prevent war in Europe after 1945 for FREE!

Contact Us