War on terrorism was started by the Bush Administration after the 9/11 attacks. Terrorism has always existed in some form or the other. This phrase has been used by the Western press when talking about the attempts made by the Russian, European and the U.S…
Download file to see previous pages...
Finally, the phrase was again used in 2001 and still is being used.
An operative definition in US foreign policy under the Federal Criminal code and stated by Bush as, "today's war on terror is like the Cold War. It is an ideological struggle with an enemy that despises freedom and pursues totalitarian aims....I vowed then that I would use all assets of our power of Shock and Awe to win the war on terror. And so I said we were going to stay on the offense two ways: one, hunts down the enemy and brings them to justice, and takes threats seriously; and two, spread freedom."
The British have some objections to the phrase 'War on Terror.' The Director of Public Prosecutions and head of the Crown Prosecution Service in the UK, Ken McDonald has stated that the places where these attacks are carried out are not battlefields and the people who die are not victims of war. Also, the people who carry out such terrorist activities are not soldiers, they are criminals.
The war on poverty was first introduced by Lyndon B. Johnson, President of the United States. The legislation was a reaction to the high economic poverty rate. This led to the development of Office of Economic Opportunity (OEO) which helped in targeting funds towards the poor and managing the poverty level that existed in the country at that time. The concept of war on poverty waned around the 1960's. The budget towards the impoverished people diminished and there was some de-regulation which led to this.
There are many view points which are very subjective to every individual. Many leaders, economists and politicians have commented on this. To some, the war on poverty is important to be victorious in the war on terror; to others finishing terrorism is more important while still to some finishing poverty is more important.
One very important factor to not is that to fight such wars, institutional structures need to be created which can help fight the war, this is as important as the conflict itself. The world has failed to win the war on poverty. This can be blamed to the political system and the judiciary. In my opinion, the upper class of society needs to be blamed more; they should make more contributions towards the poor to help diminish the huge gap that exists between the different classes of society.
The power that the government has is limited, they can not make all people rich or provide them with the money they need. They can only make a few changes in the policy to help these people get a job, get better pays or start a business. The government can not ban legitimate products and not raise wages across the nation; they have other things to consider such as inflation.
On the brighter side of the picture, many new policies and legislations were made which opened new doors for the lower class of society, labour laws were introduced, minimum wages were set and there is strict control over these policies. Thus in the US much improvement has taken place and we can easily say that they have achieved some yards in this war.
According to Hilary Benn (2007), by giving a name to the war on terror, we are not only giving all such groups an identity, a common identity but also it leads to using one uniform approach towards fighting them. All such groups need to be handled individually, with policies and strategies
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Terrorism and Poverty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/politics/1512735-terrorism-and-poverty
(Terrorism and Poverty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Terrorism and Poverty Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1512735-terrorism-and-poverty.
This threat is that of terrorism. In the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks, the face of terrorism has been associated with Afghanistan, the Al-Qaeda, Iraq, the Middle East, suicide bombers, and similar images and concepts. As some of these terrorists have expressed their disdain for Western politics and interference, they have also pointed out that their terrorist activities have been carried out for religious and political reasons.
To them, success is when a maximum number of casualties are recorded in a single strike as they view this as a positive development towards convincing their targets, who may be forced to soften their stand on the issue in dispute so as to protect life. This paper is a critical evaluation of terrorism and the factors that motivate terrorists to commit acts of violence.
Name Surname Professor Name Subject 18 November 2011 Poverty Introduction: United States of America can be observed to experience a decline in their wealthy lives and heading towards a level of poverty owing to the periods of economic slowdown. Issues related to social security, the Iran and Afghanistan wars, the necessary healthcare systems as well as the unemployment of large number of people are of huge concerns in the current times for the country (Harris).
This paper analyses psychological theories to explain why and how some people become terrorists who commit violent acts. Victoroff (2005) has formulated a psychological theory which explains the root causes of terrorism. He has argued that “Ambivalence toward authority, defective insight, adherence to convention, emotional detachment from the consequences of their actions, sexual role uncertainties, magical thinking, destructiveness, low education, and adherence to violent subculture norms and weapons fetishes” (Victoroff, p.9) are the major reasons for terrorism.
Poverty can be defined as a state where an individual lacks an amount of wealth that is socially acceptable to the society. This essay aptly examines the topic poverty, its impacts on the lives of individuals in Africa, and how the issue can be tackled by the government to improve living condition of the citizens.
The fate of poor people is unchanging mainly associated with insufficient food and clothes. They have to suffer all the societal ill-treatments. They have to be quiet and calm against any social injustice. They cannot have any status in the public life.
Although, poverty is normally measured as to be unwanted due to the pain and misery it might cause. However, charitable poverty, involving the abandonment of material goods, is seen by some as worthy. It may have an effect on individuals or groups and is not restricted to the developing states.
The Urban Dictionary gives a populist meaning of the word by stating that it is when a person’s or a group of people’s fear is manipulated for gaining forceful agreements to certain objectives. Terrorism is not war whereby either a state or non-state actors carry out an organized conflict characterized by extreme violence and economic destructions.
Another example is when James von Brunn killed a security guard at a memorial museum in Washington DC (Bjelopera, 2013). These examples show that domestic terrorism still poses a significant threat to the American society. The number of hate groups and the
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
GOT A TRICKY QUESTION? RECEIVE AN ANSWER FROM STUDENTS LIKE YOU!
Let us find you another Essay on topic Terrorism and Poverty for FREE!