Nobody downloaded yet

Compare and contrast the two philosophers of politics: John locke and Thomas Hobbes - Term Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
The aim of the present essay is to compare and contrast the political philosophy of John Locke and Thomas Hobbes, eminent thinkers whose ideas defined the further development of early modern political thought. The comparison between their theories will be made through detailed expositions of their general arguments and contrast between them…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.4% of users find it useful
Compare and contrast the two philosophers of politics: John locke and Thomas Hobbes
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Compare and contrast the two philosophers of politics: John locke and Thomas Hobbes"

Download file to see previous pages Lockean political philosophy In his Essays on the Law of Nature, which he composed in 1663-1664, Locke concentrated on the duty of men to serve the others both for God’s rewards and terrestrial happiness. Locke argued that all men were basically united in friendship and had a duty of ‘liberality’ to each other . Locke specifically lambasted a notion of ‘every man’s own interest’ as the basis for natural law, claiming that pursuit of private advantage alone could not provide a lasting basis for society’s unity . In Essays Locke observed that “the inheritance of the whole of the mankind is always one and the same” , decrying fraud and competition over the necessarily limited natural riches as the original basis of all social ills. At the same time, Locke directly tied service to society and obedience to natural law with the security of property, maintaining that it was this obedience, rather than arbitrary egoism, that created solid basics for property preservation.
In Essays Locke for the first time came to conclusion that rights of property are predicated upon natural law, even though he still did not explain the mechanism of their formation. Other themes of Essays which were later continued in Locke’s mature writings included the notion of purposeful creativity of human beings, with a presumption that God created men to engage in productive labor, rather than pursuing idleness.5. Locke also noted that society was formed out of “pressing needs” of men and that “inward instinct” of human beings made them seek their self-preservation, so that self-preservation became an innate obligation6. The Lockean political theory was eventually laid down in Two Treatises on Government, written in the 1680s with an aim to refuting the arguments of supporters of divine right of the kings. The First Treatise presents a comprehensive rebuttal of absolutists’ argument by setting out logical limits to the powers of royal authority, recognizing the right of political community to evaluate whether the sovereign transgresses his powers. Here the problem of property is also decisively dealt with, which played important part in development of liberal doctrine. According to Locke, the application of labor distinguishes private from communal property. Locke believed that product of labor constitutes the inherent property of the laborer, and that in applying his labor to the natural reaches, whether by hunting, gathering or agriculture, the right of man to the product of his labor is acquired. The necessity of individual labor thus leads inescapably to the formation of “private possessions”7. According to Locke, even though God gave the Earth to men “for their benefit, and the greatest conveniences of life they were capable to draw from it”8, men are obliged to use natural reaches and land itself in a rational manner, and those whom Locke termed “the industrious and rational” fulfill this duty much better than “the quarrelsome and contentious”, which means that the former are provided with greater share in initially communal property than the latter9. The industrious and rational are at the same time obliged not to waste land and its resources, and should avoid arbitrary use of their riches. Therefore, the right to ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Compare and contrast the two philosophers of politics: John locke and Term Paper”, n.d.)
Retrieved de
(Compare and Contrast the Two Philosophers of Politics: John Locke and Term Paper)
“Compare and Contrast the Two Philosophers of Politics: John Locke and Term Paper”, n.d.
  • Cited: 1 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Compare and contrast the two philosophers of politics: John locke and Thomas Hobbes

Thomas Hobbes

...?Section a. Thomas Hobbes wrote about the condition of Human Nature and its consequences. In the passage, the condition referred to by Hobbes is the condition of war between man and man. In the text, Hobbes indicated several attitudes innate to human beings which potentially lead themselves to war with one another. b. Ironically, the search of equality and having been able to attain it is initially the reason why war occurs. Hobbes noted that “if any two men desire the same thing which nevertheless they cannot both enjoy, they become enemies” (Hobbes par. 3) considering that they only aim for it for their own conservation...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Compare and contrast the two philosophers: John locke and Thomas Hobbes

...?Comparison and Contrast between John Locke and Thomas Hobbes: This paper is primarily based on the comparison and contrast between myriad philosophical theories presented by the renowned philosophers John Locke and Thomas Hobbes. Different philosophers have presented different theories and ideas to make the blurred image of various concepts like natural rights, property, democracy, society, security, laws, etc., understandable. They have differed on many aspects while asserting the existence and significance of these...
1 Pages(250 words)Dissertation

Thomas Hobbes

..."So that in the nature of man, we find three principall causes for quarell. First Competition; Secondly, Diffidence; Thirdly Glory."(Hobbes 185) In Chapter XIII, Hobbes describes man as "equall" and the difference between man and man is not so considerable. However, Prudence makes such an "equality incredible" as it asserts a kind of vain concept within man that he is to a greater degree "more equal" (Like Animal Farm by George Orwell) than the Vulgar. Interestingly, Hobbes describes that from the equality rise all the feelings of diffidence, anticipation and the will to a common power, which in used in "acts of conquest", which man always "pursue farther" than what is generally required....
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Peace According to John Locke and Thomas Hobbes

..., and this helps to explain the manner in which situations develop through time. Generally, it can be asserted that any theory that applies to society needs to have some kind of perspective on human nature too that would help to explain the situation in which man lives today. Whichever way one views human behavior, the present condition today has to be explained through that particular perspective. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social theorists that took human nature into great consideration in their work, and they each explained the manner in which society developed through this behavior. They also explained how society functions and how things...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Philosophers Analysis (Compare/ Contrast)

...0 Pope John Paul II: Philosophy and Theology According to Pope John Paul II, Philosophy aims to discover the truth but should not be limited to academic circle and discussion by university professors. The Philosopher Pope emphasizes that while debates of professional philosophers are indeed noteworthy, all people are capable of conducting philosophical enquiry at some stage in their lives. Indeed, all of us do ask at some point in our life the meaning, purpose and direction of life and whether there is indeed a God. If there is, then why does allow such great sufferings These questions regarding God and faith are but natural as it is natural to seek good...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Thomas Hobbes vs. John Locke/pro John Locke

...Thomas Hobbes and John Locke stand out as two of the most prominent and influential of the political philosophers. Both are ified as social contract theorists but Hobbes, whose work predates Locke's by approximately one century, was the polar opposite of the latter. Indeed, it would hardly be an exaggeration were one to claim that the one's theory is the antithesis of the other's. The aforementioned is evidenced in the fact that both had very different notions of human nature and, accordingly, of the rationale behind the entry of citizens into a social contract, the implications of the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Social Contract Theories of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke which they voluntarily consented, they created the state for the purpose of promoting and preserving their natural rights to life, liberty and property. It was John Locke who painted a picture of liberty of citizens and authority of government in tones which were far moderate than that of Thomas Hobbes. Men in a state of nature could make use of their perfect freedom for their own good, since they were reasonable men. To John Locke, men did not abuse their Liberty. They did not threaten the lives of their neighbors. He wrote: Though this is a state of liberty, yet it is not a state of license. The state of nature of nature has a law...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Compare & Contrast John Adams to Thomas Jefferson

...John Adams and Thomas Jefferson John Adams (1735-1826) was the first Vice President and the second President of the United s of America. While his tenure as President was clouded with crisis and conflict, he is still remembered as a remarkable political philosopher. He played a key role in the negotiations during the drafting of the United States Declaration of Independence in 1776, and is regarded as one of the most influential Founder Fathers of the United States of America. After serving two terms as the Vice President, Adams again contested for the Presidency in 1796 as the official Presidential candidate of the Federalist Party....
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay

Thomas Hobbes and John Locke in Social Contract Theory

...Thomas Hobbes and John Locke in Social Contract Theory 20th, December John Locke and Thomas Hobbes were social theorists responsible for the development of the social contract theory. This theory mainly suggests the formation of a stable society is influenced by people’s moral responsibilities, which rely on their collective agreement. These two social theorists use the social contract theory to explain how the government phenomenon rose to existence. The perceptions in their individual social contrast theory emanate from their works in Political...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

The philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke

...The Philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke The Philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke Philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke hold different opinions on political authority. Locke believes that human beings are born free and equal; nature provides everyone with rights and governments are only formed to protect existing rights. This is different from Hobbes’ assumption that humankind is evil by nature and chaotic if left uncontrolled. Therefore, Hobbes advocates for absolute rule. Judging the two philosophers, the form of political authority that Locke favors is unrealistic. Hobbes believes that humankind is constantly faced by the threat of mayhem as everyone strives to satisfy their passions. As a result, formation... of a...
1 Pages(250 words)Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Compare and contrast the two philosophers of politics: John locke and Thomas Hobbes for FREE!

Contact Us