We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Hobbes and Lockes - Term Paper Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Name Instructor Class 9 October 2013 Contracts, Consent, and States of Nature: Hobbes versus Locke Seventeenth-century philosophers were concerned of the transition from no-state to state societies. Thomas Hobbes’ Leviathan and John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government explore the transition toward governments and civil societies using the concepts of State of Nature, contracts, and consent…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
Polish This Essay92.3% of users find it useful
Hobbes and Lockes
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample
"Hobbes and Lockes"

Download file to see previous pages This section compares and contrasts Hobbes’ and Locke’ political theories on the nature of consent and contracts, where they have similar beliefs because they both think that consent is needed to form valid contracts. Hobbes and Locke share similar views on why consent and contracts are needed to cope with the State of Nature. Consent means that people are willing to leave the State of Nature to form a civil society that will serve communal needs and interests. Hobbes asserts that a covenant is needed to create a civil society that evades the State of Nature. He employs several terms to explain the roles of citizens and the Sovereignty in civil society. He uses the understanding of consent in relation to the status of the Sovereign as an Artificial Person by showing, that, by public consent, someone becomes an Artificial Person that has greater power than a natural person. Hobbes describes a person as someone “... ...
Hobbes argues that the Secondary State of Nature can allow the making of a valid contract because it concerns obligations and includes God as the source of enforcing power of laws: “All therefore that can be done between two men not subject to Civil Power is to put one another to swear by the God he feareth.” Because of their belief in God, they can agree on making and following a contract. Apart from fear of the State of War, Hobbes maintain that people have to give consent to create contracts. He notes that the covenant binds people upon their recognition of the Common-wealth: “I Authorize and give up my Right of Governing myself, to this Man, or to this Assembly of men, on this condition, that thou give up thy Right to him, and Authorize all his Actions in like manner.” People do not want to be completely alienated from each other despite the State of War, so it becomes relevant for them to confer authority on the Common-wealth as a binding Covenant. Their consent allows them to produce a Commonwealth and to accept their Sovereign ruler. Likewise, Locke believes that people consent to the social contract first before it becomes valid, and like Hobbes, he notes that people do not want a State of War, so they want to enter a civil society. Hobbes and Locke agree that consent is needed to form valid contracts and that when people are coerced to form contracts, these contracts are invalid. Hobbes says: “The cause of Feare, which maketh such a Covenant invalid, must be alwayes something arising after the Covenant made.” Locke confirms that consent must not be forced, or else, the contract is voided. Locke further believes that consent can be tacit or express; however, consent must be express to fully participate in the government. He stresses that ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Hobbes and Lockes Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1486569-hobbes-and-lockes
(Hobbes and Lockes Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
“Hobbes and Lockes Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1486569-hobbes-and-lockes.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document
Critical Review Paper Expansion
John Locke (1632-1704) and his work Two Treatises on Government (1690) is also a seminal work on political thought, because he stresses the precedence of civil society over the government. Kant and Rousseau are also prominent philosophers. These political thinkers have similarities and differences in how the idea of Europe as a “Civil Society” changed over time.
10 Pages(2500 words)Term Paper
Compare and contrast the two philosophers of politics: John locke and Thomas Hobbes
In this study it will be argued that, while Locke placed utmost importance on the idea of natural rights, Hobbes was early proponent of utilitarian concepts in politics, which informs the antagonism between their positions
16 Pages(4000 words)Term Paper
Hobbes and Locke on the Evolution of the Civil Society
John Locke (1632-1704) and his work Two Treatises on Government (1690) is also a seminal work on political thought, because he stresses the precedence of civil society over the government. These political thinkers have similarities and differences in how the idea of Europe as a “Civil Society” changed over time.
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper
Social Construct According to Locke
Social contract was a progressive revolution that inspired reforms in many nations all over the world. In many European nations, social contract was always against monarchs who thought that they were empowered to legislate. The contract between the citizenry determines whether there can be a political authority that is legitimate.
4 Pages(1000 words)Term Paper
Problem of Free Will
For example, one may will to move up and down the room or may will otherwise since options are within his control. An action is therefore originated if it is within the control of agent it does not have to be an agent of certain causal gents. Incompatibilists argue that one aspect of fundamental propositions that there is one common one idea, which is a free action of which an agent may be held morally responsible.
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper
Hobbes and Hume: Covenant
Some of the interlocking concepts that require definition include law, right, liberty, and obligation. Unless, these concepts are clearly distinct from each other, aspect of “covenant” as prompted by Hobbes cannot be clearly analyzed. Nonetheless, it would be as well vital to distinguish the general definition of these concepts from the specific definitions of the law of nature and the right of nature.
6 Pages(1500 words)Term Paper
Comparing the differences of purpose of government according to Philosophers. (Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, and Locke)
Purpose of Government according to Philosophers. The purpose for which governments should exist has been a preoccupation of philosophers from the classical period to the modern societies. While Plato and Aristotle represent classical philosophers, Hobbes and Locke are a part of what is seen as modern philosophers.
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper
Exam 1
Justice based on moral principles enhances fairness among all involved parties. The definition can be manipulated to fit various parties’ opinions. Consequently, philosophers define justice as a component of both moral virtue and
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper
Politics exam
3. A libertarian would not support any form of regulation of private businesses by the greater government. This is because the Libertarians are in favor of free markets. They defend the right of individuals to form cooperatives, corporations, and other kinds of
2 Pages(500 words)Term Paper
Let us find you another Term Paper on topic Hobbes and Lockes for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us