Nobody downloaded yet

What did Gorbachev mean by the new political thinking in foreign policy Was it compatible with Marxism-Leninism - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Summary
The new political thinking initiated by the Gorbachev regime in the former Soviet Union brought in tremendous changes in the foreign policy of the country. Perestroika was considered as the opening of the Russia to world and in turn the world to the Russia. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.5% of users find it useful
What did Gorbachev mean by the new political thinking in foreign policy Was it compatible with Marxism-Leninism
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "What did Gorbachev mean by the new political thinking in foreign policy Was it compatible with Marxism-Leninism"

Download file to see previous pages The new political thinking initiated by the Gorbachev regime in the former Soviet Union brought in tremendous changes in the foreign policy of the country. Perestroika was considered as the opening of the Russia to world and in turn the world to the Russia. Gorbachev’s new foreign policy was characterised by the ‘free will’ to put an end to arms race, which was materialised as the freezing of nuclear tests in august 1985, the general disarmament plan in January 1986, agreement on the elimination of medium range nuclear missiles in 1987, large scale military cuts and pulling out from Afghanistan in 1989. However, Gorbachev miserably failed not only in democratising the regime but also in preserving it. The compatibility of Gorbachev’s policies with Marxism could only be determined with relations to what we consider as the central tenets of Marxism. Still, along the Gramscian lines, it is possible to argue that the Soviet Russia undergone a phase of passive revolutions under the (non)leadership of Gorbachev. From a Marxist perspective, the Soviet Foreign policy had de-ideologised by the 1960s itself. The Gorbachevian reforms at the realm of foreign policy tried to get the foreign policy out of the irrational fears of cold war era. Gorbachevian Reforms and the New Political Thinking Many people think that the structural reforms undertook by Gorbachev was a response to the growing economic crisis Soviet Union faced in the 1980s. However, such a viewpoint does not consider the fact that many countries that are substantially poorer than Soviet Union have not undergone any systemic changes. Certainly, Gorbachev tried to modernise the economy and introduced new management techniques which are capitalistic in essence to unfetter production. However, perestroika needs to be understood as more about political reforms than economic reforms. Ironically, Gorbachevian reforms have many similarities with the austerity programmes usually adopted in capitalist countries. Gorbachev’s new political thinking was basically defined in terms of the need for an integrated world wherein both the Soviet Union and the West must try for the de-militarisation of the planet. Tsygankov argues that “by aiming for the West’s support and recognition, it inserted itself into the arena of the Western modernity of nation-states, making it increasingly difficult to discourage the Soviet ethnic republics from embarking on nationalist projects” (2006, p. 47). Here, the point is that the ideals of new political thinking such as world integration, enhanced cooperation with the West, greater autonomy for the ethnic nationalities were not compatible with the reality of an aggressively imperialist-capitalist West, especially under conservatives such as Regan and Thatcher. Remarkably, Gorbachev as a Soviet leader “found his main base of support not in the party, military, or industry, but in the liberal intelligentsia” (English, 2000, p.195). As an ambitious leader, Gorbachev actively sought Russia’s broad shift towards the West in general and the Europe in particular. The goal of perestroika was “to modify the relations of production and prevent social upheaval” but it ended up in “opening the door to the influence of capitalism, fragmenting the heterogeneous Soviet elite, and enabled an opposition linked to global neoliberalism to emerge which utilised the nascent Russian state as a mechanism for advancing systemic transformation” (Simon, 2010, p. 431). In brief, Gorbachev’s so-called reform policies necessarily ended up in the consolidation of the Russian ruling elites and the transfer of state powers to itself. Importantly, Gorbachev did not have a concrete policy of either economic regeneration or political transformation. Kenez is of the view that “Gorbachev believed in the possibility of reforming communism in ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“What did Gorbachev mean by the new political thinking in foreign Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved de https://studentshare.org/politics/1416911-what-did-gorbachev-mean-by-the-new-political-thinking-in-foreign-policy-was-it-compatible-with-marxism-leninism
(What Did Gorbachev Mean by the New Political Thinking in Foreign Essay)
https://studentshare.org/politics/1416911-what-did-gorbachev-mean-by-the-new-political-thinking-in-foreign-policy-was-it-compatible-with-marxism-leninism.
“What Did Gorbachev Mean by the New Political Thinking in Foreign Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/politics/1416911-what-did-gorbachev-mean-by-the-new-political-thinking-in-foreign-policy-was-it-compatible-with-marxism-leninism.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF What did Gorbachev mean by the new political thinking in foreign policy Was it compatible with Marxism-Leninism

Foreign Policy

...to defeating the rebel insurgents. Conversely, there is a unanimous knowing that the decision to evade Atropia will eventually attract a string of criticism. Conversely, I’d like to bring to your attention that current predilections towards the use of force may materialize banishing military supremacy to a certain edge, which may on the whole be misunderstood. The American people may rebuke this mission as a wrong solution. Work Cited Cox, Michael. National Power and Interagency Process. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. Print. Eaton, Derek. America’s Army: A model for Interagency Effectiveness. Connecticut: Praeger, 2008. Print. Foster, John. Piety, Pragmatism, and Power in U.S. Foreign...
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay

Foreign Policy

...Foreign Policy: United s Presidential Debates In an election year, especially before the voting gets underway, American candidates for the presidency, as well as the incumbent – in this case, Barack Obama, engage in rallies and conventions across the nation. It is here that most Americans, if they are watching television, can get a view of the candidates at work and showing what their selling skills to the people of America are. Yet, a truly interested voter will take the time to investigate the issues and determine the truth of what each candidate says about these issues. From there, as regards the incumbent, a voter will decide if that president really did all he could do to achieve...
7 Pages(1750 words)Research Paper

Foreign policy

..., norms and identities shape the behaviour of state hence its foreign policy. Different interest groups in the state have different views which they share with policy makers thus affecting the direction of foreign affairs. However, there are different views of constructivism as there are in the other theories. Some believe in role of norms such as in international laws in eroding notions of sovereignty and minimising role of state power. Others view transnational communication and shared civic values as creating new forms of political association and eroding traditional national loyalties thus shaping the state behaviour. The only problem...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

The 'New Look' in Foreign Policy

...that Eisenhower implemented the 'New Look' foreign policy. Eisenhower's 'New Look' policy was a novel approach to military defence that kept his critics at bay and set the stage for the future of the Cold War and the next 20 years of US and Soviet history. Dwight D. Eisenhower was elected president in 1952 in a political climate of too many enemies and not enough money. The popular ex-commanding General came into office determined to keep the Soviets from extending their scope any wider in Europe while staying out of direct, armed conflict. He was concerned about domestic policy and was insistent on not sacrificing the...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Gobachevs New Foreign Policy and its Consequences

...reforms meant to eliminate ineffective administrative structures without fundamentally altering the state-run economy. Politically, Gorbachev introduced glasnost so as to decrease the control of the state and Communist Party interests, the obstacles to economic reform. Political reform was successful but also initiated opposition that ultimately led to Gorbachev’s political demise. New foreign policy thinking was created and implemented to support the pressing needs for economic reform and internal political reforms. These reforms reunited Germany and earned...
11 Pages(2750 words)Essay

Marxism Leninism and National Democratic Revolution in South Africa

... in future. References: 1. Freeman, Michael 2000). “The Perils of Democratization: Nationalism, Markets, and Human Rights” Human Rights Review 2.1 pp 33-51. 2. Funke, Nikki (2007). “Redressing Inequality: South Africa’s New Water Policy.” Environment 49.3 (April 2007) pp 12-23. 3. Marxist Education Plan, available online at http://www.socialistappeal.org/edplan/index.php (July 16, 2007) 4. Whitehead, Laurence (1997). “The Vexed Issue of the Meaning of Democracy” Journal of Political Ideologies 2.2 (June 1997) pp 121. 5. Nash, Andrew (1999). ‘The Moment of Western Marxism in South Africa’. Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East, Vol. XIX No. 1... Marxism Leninism and National Democratic...
3 Pages(750 words)Article

Political Science (U.S. foreign policy Afghanistan)

...Political Science (U.S. Foreign Policy Afghanistan) of Introduction Good politics, policies, and practices have been listed as the three best ingredients by which public affair objectives may be achieved. This assertion implies that for a public policy to realize its objectives, it requires to be politically viable. However, a politically viable policy is only workable if it does change the immediate policy or the status quo and it must be implementable both theoretically and in practice to achieve its objectives (Brown & Scales, 2012). The United States and its NATO allies must, thus, ensure the intersection of three principles of good practices, good policies, and good politics in executing operations and mandate in Afghanistan... covered...
5 Pages(1250 words)Term Paper

Foreign policy

.... In the past, major investors in Australia were largely democratic and western, so it was not difficult for foreign policy experts to forge partnerships between these nations. However, China is a unique case for the country because of the unconventional nature of its social-political climate; some reconciliations and transitions must take place before sustainable relations can be reached (Camilleri, Martin and Michael, 2013). China and Australia’s symbiotic association can largely be attributed to Australia’s mineral resources and China’s huge demand for these resources. On the other hand, several Chinese students come to Australia to acquire a higher education while other older...
9 Pages(2250 words)Essay

Public Diplomacy

... global norms, access to communication channels used in framing global news by a nation, and augmented credibility through domestic and international behavior. Soft power is culture power owing to the need for both private and public organizations as well as international relations between governments to consider the cultural definition of the parties. Culture determines values and information that make up soft power and are evident in negotiations and practices giving negotiators in a company scene or at international level the ability to make ideas on cooperation between the counties. Respecting and have mutual understanding of cultural difference among countries allows for the mutual understanding and goof information flow... . This...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay

American Foreign Policy in a New Era

... growth such as trade and power, constructivist approach concentrated on the effect of ideas (Jervis, 2005). Constructivist theories do not assume that states seek survival only. Ideally, these theories argue that states are a product that is malleable for historic and specific processes. The approach pays more attention on the root course of a change compared to liberalism and realism. Reference Jervis, R. (2005). American Foreign Policy in a New Era. London: Routledge.... Response Robert Jervis discusses the existence of a security community by establishing a pluralistic security community formed by the most powerful nations where the idea of war among them is all but unthinkable (Jervis, 2005). Apparently, Jervis relies on realism,...
1 Pages(250 words)Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic What did Gorbachev mean by the new political thinking in foreign policy Was it compatible with Marxism-Leninism for FREE!

Contact Us