Nobody downloaded yet

Hamiltons and Jefferson's political philosophy - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
After the creation of the United States of America in 1776 and the election of George Washington in 1789, there was a fierce battle in the States about the role that a government should play in domestic and foreign policies of the country. …
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER92.3% of users find it useful
Hamiltons and Jeffersons political philosophy
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "Hamiltons and Jefferson's political philosophy"

Download file to see previous pages Hamilton’s and Jefferson's political philosophy

There were two camps who came head to head over advocating different ideologies; on one side there was Alexander Hamilton, the secretary of treasury under Washington who advocated a strong centralized government, while on the other hand there was Thomas Jefferson, the secretary of state under Washington and the third President of the U.S. who was against a centralized government and favored a republican government that would have more to do with foreign affairs and less with the laws that have been imposed in any state of the country.

Jefferson opposed a centralized form of government feeling that it would threaten the notions of freedom laid down by the Constitution. Jefferson did everything that was in his power to make sure that America did not become the “new” England under King George III, which would be disastrous to the cause of the revolution on which basis the American nation had been founded. Alexander Hamilton had a different point of view.

Alexander Hamilton could be considered an elitist who advocated that rich and well-born are the chosen ones to rule the country (Nagel 76). Alexander Hamilton believed that a country like America would not survive if it gives too much freedom to its states as doing that would mean fueling their desire of their own independence. Hamilton was like a deputy to George Washington and was quite effective in formulating the policy of incorporation of centralized government in the United States....
According to Hamilton, I believe the British government forms the best model the world has ever produced...This government has for its object public strength and individual security. (Pollard 69) He viewed the British form of government in the exact opposite context as was seen by Thomas Jefferson. Hamilton was accepting the good points of a centralized government point of view in the British form of government against the bad points of freedom laid down by the same government. The section of the U.S. politics from which Hamilton originated was very concerned with the survival of the 13 states that made up the United States of America back in that time, regardless of what the role of government was defined. However, he was quite sure that the vision put forward by Thomas Jefferson, a republican form of government, was in no way practical for the survival of states. Jefferson interpreted the constitution as sacred text that defines the rights of the government. According to Jefferson the government shall be defined in the following way: "Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." (Baghatur 239) He wanted to prove Hamilton wrong who proclaimed that a government with limited powers will not be able to guarantee the survival of ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“Hamiltons and Jefferson's political philosophy Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from
(Hamiltons and Jefferson'S Political Philosophy Essay)
“Hamiltons and Jefferson'S Political Philosophy Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Hamiltons and Jefferson's political philosophy

Political Philosophy

.../kant-and-deontology/ [Accessed 23 April 2012]. Long, Eugene Thomas, 2005, "Sherover, Charles M. from Kant and Royce to Heidegger: Essays in Modern Philosophy," The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 58, p. 920+. Mandt, A.J., 1997, "Fichte, Kant's Legacy and the Meaning of Modern Philosophy," The Review of Metaphysics, vol. 50, p. 591+. Mieszkowski, Jan, 2006, Labors of Imagination: Aesthetics and Political Economy from Kant to Althusser, New York, Fordham University Press. Murphy, Margueritte, 2008, "Pure Art, Pure Desire: Changing Definitions of L'art Pour L'art from Kant to Gautier," Studies in Romanticism, vol.  47, p. 147+. Nagel, T., 1988, Autonomy and Deontology. In S....
15 Pages(3750 words)Essay

Political Philosophy

...hand, the Absolutist answer describes that the state of nature, without political security is barbarous, dangerous, as well as, impoverished, that is rational to give major freedom to the government or state in order to gain security or peace. Hobbes agrees with this statement in his “Leviathan”. In the Democratic Answer, John Locke concurs with Hobbes when he states that individuals can contract with the government in order to give up on some freedom in exchange of security. Nonetheless, he disagrees with him on the degree of which people should surrender to the state. According to Locke, it is illogical to give up natural rights to representation, property, life and other goods, than slavery to the government....
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

Political Philosophy

...Political Philosophy Introduction Many people have questioned whether the government, with all its laws and regulations, is justified to rule the people. What right does the government have to demand that its people obey? Why should an individual obey the state in the first place? These are just a few of philosophical queries being asked. Nonetheless, a majority of the responds stress the need for an orderly process and protection as the justification for obedience to the government. Some have highlighted the need to promote cultural and spiritual aspects of the populace while others stress the need for economic well-being, which stands as the foundation for all values. This text looks into the answers...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Habermas Political Philosophy

...(Jews); Muslim slaying Hindus and vice-versa in the name of religious principles, and so on and so forth. Each of these examples show how the leader group can influence the change of a standard basic ethical norm into a distorted one which will be sustained by the group though basically not totally internalized, but nonetheless totally followed to the letter T. The Habermas theory has been proved again and again in all the above examples in the historical past, as well as the contemporary American politics. It shows that there s actually not standard ethical moral norm to be followed by any given group. Rather, the leading moral and ethical norm is actually based upon the dictated of the most powerful...
20 Pages(5000 words)Essay

Political Philosophy

...Sociological aspect of primary and secondary rules of H.L.A. Hart Herbert Lionel Adolphus Hart was a great philosopher of the twentieth century. He was a barrister by profession but accepted the post of teaching fellowship at New College, Oxford. He was dedicated in the field of legal and politicalphilosophy and was well known for his work, The Concept of Law, in 1961. He has also developed a theory of legal positivism. Theories of legal positivists were based on three things. Firstly according to them it is not always that what the law should be is the law. It means that sometimes legal thing is not moral. What the law is and what it should... they ...
2 Pages(500 words)Essay

Poltical science - political philosophy

...suggest that he held philosophy in high regard and felt it was even necessary for the proper function of a society. This seeming inconsistency between the rigid restriction of philosophy among the people and the importance of philosophy to the proper governing of that society prompts the question; did Plato believe the philosopher posed a danger to the state or a benefit? To answer this question, it is necessary to delve into Plato’s description of the perfect leader which includes an investigation into the concepts of morality and ethics as well as an understanding of the restrictions and opportunities he envisioned for his ideal society’s exposure to philosophy. As...
12 Pages(3000 words)Essay

Political Philosophy

...Political Philosophy Whenever we consider the social nature of a government, i.e. what constitutes a government, what legislations it should pass, what laws it should uphold, what freedoms it should defend as well as what duties its citizens owe to the government and their city or country we refer to this branch of philosophy as political philosophy. This type of philosophy focuses on the basic nature of the political system though it is a more generalized form of the discipline rather than technical. Socrates and his pupil Plato are one of the first in history to delve into the aspect of political philosophy. Plato’s the republic spoke of Plato’s vision for an ideal state understood that justice was essential to the unity... of the...
4 Pages(1000 words)Assignment

Political philosophy

...Political Philosophy How and its legitimate use of physical force came into being is a controversial for researchers.Political philosophers like Hobbs (1588-1679), Locke (1632-1704), Rousseau (1712-1778) and others proposed their own different convictions on Social Contract Theory, as a device used to justify the political authority. According to them, political power originated from a pre political natural condition through a gradual development of Social Contract. This pre political natural condition is termed as ‘state of nature’. Although the theorists agree that people were to renounce their liberty for the sake of social contract,...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Political Philosophy: Democracy

...about the change to a democratic republic in a peaceful and voluntary manner, so does the distinction between revolution and democracy get lost sometimes in Rousseau’s writing. The contradictions inherent in his political philosophy may suggest to some hints of anarchy, and to others hints of republican freedom. For instance, Rousseau claims the general will of the civil society is the unanimous consent of the citizens, and yet assumes that the general will is nothing more than the sum of individual wills. Along with Rousseau’s theory on the origin of the civil society, the absolute equality of all people, and the absolute freedom of people, social contract theory is riddled with false claims. Civil...
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay

Political Philosophy

...of the dominant ideology and system of political economy in the countries. For instance, in purely capitalistic countries like the United States, defense of natural rights to private property take precedence over all other claims whereas in socialist countries, the state and private owners are sometimes at odds when the issue of defense of property rights is concerned. And in purely communist countries (a rarity nowadays), the state has the absolute power over property and there is no concept of private property. Nature of Power and Capital according to Marx According to Marx, capital “refers to a historically specific mode of production (based on the producers separation from the conditions of production) and the...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic Hamiltons and Jefferson's political philosophy for FREE!

Contact Us