Induction as a Sourcing From Facts That Channel to Progress of a General Judgment - Coursework Example

Knowledge of causation states that for a particular phenomenon to occur under specific conditions there must be another thing that leads to it.

Knowledge of causation is helpful in the anticipation of regularity in that one can determine the results of a certain issue following prior experience. Intentions of particular causes include logical and causal relations. Therefore, it is possible for one to decide when anticipating regularity whether to end or commence to hold on to an idea (Bernecker & Dretske, 2000). Hume disagrees with the idea of induction and causation. In causation, he critiques that though one issue leads to another it’s also possible that one issue does not lead to another.

Hume reviewed that the reasoning in induction is circular and does not have a foundation. He justified this in two ways. First, he argued that logic could not assure our inductions. The other justification is that an individual can only assume that experience about something is likely to remain repeated. Hume permits the use of induction and causation in daily experiences if only one recognizes the constraints of their knowledge. In conclusion, Hume’s argument about causal theory and induction relied on his skepticism and causal necessity.

It is exhibited by the fact that he did support neither the induction reasoning nor the knowledge of causation.