Unsuspecting Souls: The Disappearance of the Human Being - Assignment Example

Who are we? Do we have soul or are we merely a bundle of mental events, or perhaps some other combination? Introduction There are various claims tohow human souls existed. Human souls are unimaginable and uncatchable because these are not visible. Many are asking on what really makes up a human’s soul. This is the question that continues to become so controversial. There are conflicts in various ideological claims of science with cosmology and evolution in opposition to religious claims of the world. These ideas are too difficult to grasp which makes every human mind enter a cognitive dilemma on what assertions and assumptions must really be considered. The present paper will uncover the claims of science wherein it does not acknowledge the existence of souls. Moreover, the current study will also take the adage of the religious side wherein they hardly believe with their fundamental faith to a supernatural human being as the master of souls. Thence, every single question to what composes the soul with its possible or impossible existence will be recovered in this paper as the questions will then serve as a justification with regard to how the unanswered questions reveal the perspective of this paper. Scientific Claims “God did not create life, science created life” (Sanders 237). Such line adheres to the importance of science. It opposes the religious rites and faith of the Christian society. However, the science claims that the evolution itself speaks of how a person could be influenced to what the people in the society dictate which could made them think of a wishful unstoppable life with the concept of soul (Grange 16). The scientific studies claim the connection of one’s mental usage of mind in which people use this for the purpose of thinking outside the boundaries of what one loves to think about (Goetz and Taliaferro 152). Accordingly, the soul does not exist because the body makes its own physical features worthy enough to be used as actions will be made and as a person could be able to act what is accordingly reasonable with purpose. Asma claimed that it is the way of science that soul is unclear and unknown because scientists could not prove or see it even in a microscopic way (qtd. in Goetz and Taliaferro 157). The field of science does not believe that a certain word or thing could exist when evidence is not seen. Science did not see anything that would serve as a proof like how invisible the soul is towards how the humanity exists. They believe that souls are definite in terms of how an individual’s mental set of mind primes the body on the proper actions that must be taken. Scientists then perceive that soul is just part of a person’s mental structuring in which the body could interact with (Goetz and Taliaferro 157). This could mean that scientists believed that it is the choice and option of every human being to think how soul can be interpreted in one’s set of beliefs. They tend to mean that people dictate their minds to choose on what is proper and inappropriate to believe. To believe in the existence of the soul that would be independent from one’s own body distinguishes that a person believes even when he does not see it. This is what science contradicts about because they could only hear the soul in the dictates of every human being, and they could not justify it in the means of their own practical activities and measurements. Religious Claims What the science claims is contradictory in the field of religion. St. Thomas Aquinas and St. Augustine believed that souls are independent from the body because of the omnipresent God (Goetz and Taliaferro 30). Christian testaments (old) before in the Christian Medieval period emphasized this notion that souls are not snared inside the body. Religious faiths believe that souls are free and endless because God is the ultimate beholder of it. Every human being deserves to be less humane when death came across their lives because the religion took beneath on what the supernatural power of God condemns. Religion believes that there is life after death, and that is when the soul could become free from all distortions that the human physical body could feel. The question now lies to how the religion reads and interprets the questions pertaining to the soul. The answer is clear. The bible and the scriptures of the people’s faith to God suggest their theory of the soul. The theory that suggests how the soul enlivens the spirit that God endows to every individual, and the spirit that fulfills the soul with its eternity (Genesis 37; qtd. in Goetz and Taliaferro 31). Questions Unanswered by Existing Souls The continual question now lies to how the soul could feel and remember? If souls are independent from the body? Could it remember how the physical body have used it? Could the soul hear the woes of his loving ones when that soul enlivens the physical body? If soul is incrementally found to become independent when the body could no longer survive, or it has already died, would this mean that the physical body is dependent with the soul wherein the body could not function without it? Phenomenologically, it is too hard to claim how soul exists when souls could not touch and prove anything in this world to let the people know that it is really true. It is indeed hard to claim about it when people are unsurprisingly afraid to die and check how they could meet themselves with a copycat figure of their physical body to their souls. No matter what people believed may it be in science and base on their religious faiths, there is no answer to the mystery of death that awaits us. The answer only depends on us. With this matter, how would be the conflict between religion and science would be totally unwrangled? Bering indulges the matter of rationality behind every reason that each scientific and religious dimension must portray (453). This could mean that what the literal way of interpreting what soul really is, is to understand that both fields are incompatible. Supernatural ends and beliefs in life could enhance one’s mind to make some excuses to one’s particular health, and even psychological health could be undermined because there are people who claim about bad spirits and ghosts that would enter into their souls (Bering 455). When it comes into scientific fields, there are also limits to expand and take a look on the extraneous variable considerations like what the religious people contend. Religion and Science express the soul in their own limited ways wherein experience to death could give and clarify everything that lies behind every living phenomenal question of what a soul really is. This is to confirm that no one has ever explained the whereabouts of an illuminous soul of every creature that started to live and exist when the cosmos have fully developed and born a universe that conspired to what the mundane society believes. Conclusion Reviewing the claims of every aspect in various fields, may it be in science or in religious side is not easy to comprehend. The clash of the two sides based on how they answer how souls could be verifiable or not could be considered as the most time consuming part to think of because it could lead the learners to shift their perspectives unclear. We, humans, are indeed unfathomable. Human minds are unpredictable, and so our own death. We could not even figure out the seeds of our own lives, the souls. Works Cited Bering, Jesse. “The Folk Psychology of Souls.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2011): 453-498. Print. Goetz, Stewart, and Charles Taliaferro. A Brief History of the Soul. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2011. Print. Grange, Joseph. Soul: A Cosmology. New York, NY: Suny Press. Print. Sanders, Barry. Unsuspecting Souls: The Disappearance of the Human Being. Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint Press, 2009. Print. Read More