Kant's Perpetual Peace - Assignment Example

Kants Perpetual Peace The current global peace is a result of international cooperations including treaties among nations. The agreements guide resource allocation, trade, and territorial boundaries. In the past, these factors fuelled civil and international conflicts that hindered development and peaceful coexistence. In line with the new development, I support Kant’s Perpetual Peace views that were made over 200 years ago. According to Kant’s perspective, the nonexistence of large-scale conflicts between states results from the inclination to cooperation over the war. Kant’s philosophical writing over 200 years ago offered the frameworks for enhancing peace that the international community adopted. Kant described that perpetual peace between nations was achievable, feasible, and ideal. He presented frameworks encompassing participation of all parties in the formulation of a treaty, respecting the sovereignty of the nation regardless of the size and resources, abandonment of standing armies and respect of every nations constitution. Kant also highlighted the no country should countenance any form of hostility towards the neighbor, formulation of a republican constitution, embedding nation laws on a federation of independent nations and upholding the universal human rights. Kant progressed the ideology of formulation of international treaties to enhance international understanding and exchange of idea. In his view, he argued that wars result from the lack of nations to terminate war-triggering factors like unbalanced sharing of resources, like water or minerals. Therefore, he advanced an honorable approach to similar address factors. In the current world, nations have formed international treaties to cease tensions and guide resource allocation (Kant, 2007). The treaties like the Nile Treaty guide the equitable sharing water resources in the African Nations thereby reducing resource-driven conflicts. Besides, the Geneva Conventions promulgated in the year 1949 helped to cool the tension of the World War II. It described the fundamental rights of wartime captives and offered protection for the bordering people and the wounded thereby minimizing the prevalence of the war. Nations also formed treaties to combat global terrorism and enhance peaceful coexistence of the nations. The most notable include the Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts and Convention on Offenses and Acts Committed on Board Aircraft (Cassese, 2006). The treaties so far have protected citizens of various countries against acts of terrorism that can trigger incidences of war. It is an approach borrowed from Kant’s Perpetual Peace framework. Kant also indicated that global peace shall arise if the worldwide community and neighbors respect the sovereignty of other nations. Respecting the independence of other nations, entail respect of the countries institutions and symbols of unity. These include the presidency, the national flag, and the constitutions. In addition, valuing the sovereignty of other nations include observance of the cultural heritage and non-interference with the nations internal affairs like the elections and economic activities. It is evident that Kant had a logical explanation because respect earns peace. Besides, expressing worth for another state’s leaders improves the foreign relationships that minimize the likelihood of wars or similar activities (Kant, Kleingeld, Waldron, Doyle & Wood, 2006). Kant’s idea is evident in the modern society because every nation values other nations. In addition, the abolition of slave trade and slavery also indicated the respect and desire for international cooperation. The current advancements including the existence of entities like Rome Statue and the international judicial systems indicate that nations have diplomatic ways to solve conflicts. The existing mechanisms encompass cooperation of nations that in turn minimizes tensions that can lead to conflicts. The demobilization of the standing army as proposed by Kant reduced global tension and offered the environment for collaboration and development. It is true that the standing army, for example, The Ancient Rome Army threatened enhanced suspicions of imminent attacks on the neighbors. Unlike the army reserves, this category remained intact and had superior weapons in readiness for war even during peace. Therefore, the lack of the same armies in the present world has enabled nations to relate without fear of attacks. It has also improved trade international understanding (Kant, 2007). Alongside the abandonment of these armies, Kant also echoed the observance of every nations constitution. The approach guides international relations and conflict resolutions. Extensively, the constitution improves diplomacy that in turn enables conflict resolution. In the spirit of addressing national, regional, and international peace, Kant suggested that nations should formulate the republican constitution. The type of constitution had elementary principles comprising heightening the citizens’ freedom, enhancing equality including regional and gender equality. The republican constitution also enabled patriotism among the members of a nation. In this respect, Kant helps to create a culture that citizens are accountable for their peace and international relations by bearing the consequences of war. The approach empowered the present generations to make sound decisions regarding wars and their minimization. In addition, the approach encourages nations to become hospitable for persons fleeing wars from their nations. In this context, Kant had a vision of hostile communities and persuaded them to form agencies to help resettle refugees. The existing reflections of Kant’s vision include the-the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and other Non-Governmental Organizations like the International Rescue Committee (Cabrera, 2005). These agencies collaborate to propagate peace and assist wartime victims. They also promote dialogue to end wars the way Kant envisioned more than 200 years ago. Even though Kant lived more than 200 years ago, he influenced the formulation of laws guided by a federation of independent states. Kant envisioned enhancing transnational equality and fair treatment of the citizens of every nation. Comparable constitutions guided the entry to agreements between nations by providing equal chances. Therefore, no nation could feel shortchanged and consider uncivilized methods of that could lead to war. The vision is evident in the present society in which nations have formulated country specific constitutions that guide operations. The constitutions also give nations a platform for international dialogue on contentious matters like peace and security (Kant, 2007). Kant also suggested the localization of the treaties to fit in every nation’s constitution. The localization enabled every nation to monitor any likelihood of offenses that might disrupt international peace. Besides, the localization of treaties enabled nations to establish a benchmark for addressing similar problems. The nations assist one another with technical support and expertise to handle matters of national and global concerns. Instances that include this include global efforts to combat climate change, poaching, and human trafficking. In addition, nations participate in global conferences that address similar concerns facilitating dialogue and networking (Kant, Kleingeld, Waldron, Doyle & Wood, 2006). Finally, Kant persuaded the nations to respect the human rights and offer a sustainable environment for attaining the basic wants. The modern nations adopted Kant’s view by becoming signatories to the United Nations and ratifying the international law for the protection of human rights. Kant viewed that if nations cooperated in a joint mission to eradicate a global challenge, they would foster peace achieve development. In this respect, the law applies to the local, regional, and global level enabling equality and peace in nations (Cabrera, 2005). Arguably, Kant had a vision for the peace that exists in the current world. The principles that Kant progressed enabled the formulation of international laws, global treaties, and respect for the sovereignty of nations. Even though he mentioned these initiatives in the past era, it is evident that the effects of the world wars motivated him to seek for lasting solutions. Likewise, nations have strived to implement the recommendations and enhanced international corporations. To date, nations relate freely and discourage global issues that might affect peace, for example, slavery, and racism. The nations also cooperate through trade, sports, and conferences. I am of the view that Kant’s ideas influenced even the current curriculum development that promotes global peace and international relations. Thus, Kant is the founder of the global peace. References Cabrera, L. (2005). Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State. London: Taylor & Francis. Cassese, A. (2006). The multifaceted criminal notion of terrorism in international law. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 4(5), 933-958. Kant, I. (2007). Perpetual Peace. London: Filiquarian Publishing, LLC. Kant, I., Kleingeld, P., Waldron, J., Doyle, M. W., & Wood, A. W. (2006). Toward perpetual peace and other writings on politics, peace, and history. Yale University Press. Read More