The Origins of Inequality - Essay Example

He even advocates for divorce if the woman and man have completed their duty to raise their kids. The essence of discussing conjugal society is to distinguish it from that of political society. Locke sturdily distinguishes the two for the woman and man have the same power in their marriage, and neither one surrenders their natural freedom. Procreation as well leads to the persistence of the human race, so the obligation of parents is not just to produce children, but also to bring them up them.

A woman may happen to be pregnant again even when she is bringing up her older kids, calling for the father’s constant presence, as well as the provider. God wanted the human marriage to last longer than that of other animals since through it they would be capable of making their lives better. Rousseau claims that Locke’s assertions are wrong since the innovation of conjugal society is the cause of women’s regular pregnancies and not an effect. (Rousseau et al. 217). Before the invention of conjugal society, women could take care of their kids without assistance from their husbands and the husbands lacked any proclivity to help them.

When women and men start living together, more children are bored by women thus men develop a desire to assist in raising the kids up. In the family, as per Rousseau, it is the duty of a husband to provide since the women are always preoccupied with bringing up the kids. This is contrary to Locke’s claim that both parents should mutually provide for the needs of the family. Contrary to Locke’s point of view, a man is usually detached from a woman after conception since he has already fulfilled his desires, and he does not care about his actions’ consequences.

(Rousseau et al. 88). Rousseau’s perspective on the nature of the relationship between women and men is based on the idea that men are stronger and thus more independent. They depend on women just because they have a desire for them. By contrast, women both desire and need men. As much as women are meant to submit to their husbands as a natural role, Rousseau does not regard men as simply above women. Women have certain talents that men lack. They are cleverer than men, excelling more in matters of handy reason.

The natural man’s desires do not go beyond his physical needs, which are the woman, food and rest (Rousseau et al. 26). The metaphysical part of the natural man (perfectibility and freedom) makes him unique from other animals. The freedom of willing for good and the freedom of choice enhances the flexibility of a man to shape his soul, as well as his form of life. Contrary, the acts of other animals are limited by their instincts. Rousseau believes that traditional sex duties that are informed by nature, and the natural sex differences amid women and men will remain unchanged.