Religious realism vs. anti-realism - Essay Example

Religious realism vs Anti-realism Religious realism refers to the view that religious practices and languages are a reference to a divine reality existing independently of them. Moreover, such reality or being confers value or meaning on language and practices themselves. Religious antirealism denies both views as much as it is advocating religions as meaningful and worthwhile. In fact, the religion antirealism argues that there is no reality or transcend being to which religious practices or language refer to and emphasises that the source of religious value and meaning lie within human beings (Murphey, 187).

However, debate on religion realism and antirealism matters in the society today due to the fact that there are rising radicals in the two areas. For instance, religion relies more on supernatural powers, therefore it needs one to believe that there exists a natural being that they pray to. I take a realist position since on the issue I believe that there exists supernatural being providing spiritual carte despite the fact that science cannot prove that. Thus discussion on realist and antirealist is important since it will enlighten one and let them grow in faith.

Therefore, with that knowledge it will be unlikely for one to be waivered form his or her believes.Moreover, antirealist believes that one cannot take theories to be true. Additionally, they give instances of scientific theories that have been proven not to be true. Thus, they believe that majority of theories are wrong and they should never be relied on. For they argue that the newton’s theory which had been used for quite some time, was proven not to be true with the recent technology. On the other hand, realist believe that non observable phenomena does really exist.

For instance, people believe that there exists the black hole despite the fact that they have not seen it. The same way Christians believe in the existence of God who is supernatural and can hear at the same time answer their prayers. Despite their differences the antirealist and realists agree that once in religion, one has to engage in particular believes and practices that are meaningful and valuable in some way to the believers (Nuyen, 394).Realism is part of the society today, for instance, a number of people have not been to china but they believe that it does exist.

It does not need one to travel to each and every part of the world to ascertain that it really does exist. Thus realism comes in handy since one is obliged to believe that the countries or various places do exist. Secondly, most people believe that quarks do exist (Norsen, 312). The existence of God is not different from believing on the existence of other parts of the world and groups of people without necessarily seeing them. Lastly, by the fact that human beings are created in a unique way, there are a number of things that happened in the human body that are beyond comprehension, thus believing in some aspects is inevitable and part of life.

Work cited A.T.Nuyen. “Realism, Anti-Realism andEmmanuel Levinas.” The Journal Of religion 81 (2001): 394-409. .Murphey, Murray. “Realism about the Past.” A Companion to the Philosophy of History and Historiography. N.p., 2009. 181–189. Web.Norsen, Travis. “Against `Realism’.” Physical Review Letters (2006): 311–340. Web.