ISIS and Premises - Admission/Application Essay Example

The fact that ISIS has seized control of two independent countries that are known to be military capable and politically stable clearly points to its ability and skills. Gaining control of a country requires skills and technical know-how in a number of aspects that would explore the shortcomings of countries vulnerabilities. Subsequently, I believe that it is not correct to state that a group that has been able to gain control of a stable nation that has put in place a stable defence system is skillfully gifted and tactfully aware.

The second premise also accounts for the truth. It argues that the group’s sophistication and ability to impose cruel force on its victims is matched by the financial support and skills it portrays. The above argument leaves no room for argument. For a group to be able to carry out such animal-like activities of killing human beings, they must be able to have strong support from influential people. It is true that to fulfill the objective or crime this serious, financial support must be highly matched.

A greater crime requires the support and skills to match the means.On the other hand, the conclusion leaves much to be desired and does not account for a proper from. Remarkably, the above two arguments satisfy or match the conclusion given. I believe that success can be achieved or accomplished in a vast number of ways. The two premises do not quite match or broadly account for success. It is impractical to measure another person’s measure of success without realizing their true objective and perceptions towards realizing these goals (French et al.71). As much as the two premises are true, the likelihood that they offer a concluding remark that is so finite makes the conclusion improper.

Measuring success is a continuous process and thus cannot be judged conclusively. Standardized• Isis has already seized control of two of the Middle Eastern region hardest nations to infiltrate and has done it at a fast pace.• Isis is tactful and skillfully aware and holds a sophisticated mindset that enables it to dominate its enemies.• Isis has been able to impose harsh Islamic law with Brute force.• Therefore, they are the most successful extremists group that has ever been witnessed.

Argument 4:The argument’s form does not make a good case. Although both premises seem correct, the conclusion does not offer a good solution to the problem. Both of the premises in the argument do pass the true premises test. It is true that the chances of defeating ISIS could be achievable when other Muslim Nations see the threat it poses to their security and that of the world. Additionally, many Muslims seem to be in a relationship with the group is also true. This argument supports the fact that, although the group is independent of any affiliations with countries or governments, it does not rule out the possibility of the existence of such relationships.

The way the argument has been constructed gives an expression that the possibility of such relationships could be true, but it is not for certain.I also consider the phrase to be true since it does not offer the facts out of certainty but as vague suggestions. The likelihood to defeat ISIS will definitely be improved when the Muslim nation realizes the dangers it poses to their countries and the whole nation. This argument is also true. It does not try to give a certain conclusion but offer a continuous realization of the dominant problem.

The phrase does not suggest that the group will be stopped once Muslim Nations realize the dangers they pose but an improvement to the situation will likely be witnessed by such nations.The conclusion, on the other hand, does not offer a sensible end to the arguments raised. It tries to point out in conviction that the above arguments have to end as if they were true. Given that the arguments were not suggested out of certainty, it, therefore, constricts the firmness of the conclusion. Although the suggestions raised in the two premises are true, the conclusion should only account for the credibility of the raised arguments and their truthfulness.

The conclusion ought to be balanced because there is no Muslim country that has been identified to be collaborators to the ISIS group or no evidence to show that they lack cooperation. Additionally, it should have been represented as a plea to the nations to become more aware of the situation and offer genuine support to the fight against ISIS rather than a command.Standardized• Stopping Isis from conducting its extremist movement could be achievable if Muslim countries realize the threat the group poses.