StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Socrates Argument in the Crito - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
From the paper "Socrates Argument in the Crito " it is clear that generally speaking, Socrates emphasized to Crito that the destruction of the laws of the Athenian society as a result of an escape from prison would only be done by a despicable slave…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.3% of users find it useful
Socrates Argument in the Crito
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Socrates Argument in the Crito"

Socrates’ Argument in the Crito According to Crito, until the boat which left before Socrates’ trial would arrive was not in Athens, then no execution should take place. However, since the boat would arrive in Athens on that day, Crito urgently requested Socrates to escape from prison. What followed and transpired between Socrates and Crito was a meaningful dialogue where the latter convinced the former that an escape from prison would be the best solution. The philosopher, however, through a Socratic dialogue, reiterated his refusal to escape because he believed that a morally upright life would be better than mere survival. More importantly, Socrates emphasized in his argument against Crito that he had to follow the law. The first premise of the argument of Socrates is, “If a citizen actively or tacitly accepts the benefits of the States Laws, then that citizen agrees to abide by all those Laws.” The second premise is, “Socrates actively accepted the benefits of the States Laws. The conclusion is, “Therefore, Socrates must obey the Laws and command to drink hemlock rather than flee Athens.” Although Socrates’ argument sounds theoretically possible, the problems with the two premises as well as his faulty answers to Crito’s suggestions somehow makes the whole argument unsound. Socrates’ case was that of a certain death penalty through drinking of the hemlock. Crito arrived in prison in Athens in order to convince Socrates to escape for that was obviously and logically his only chance to escape. Crito offers him four reasons to escape. First, he offered him a bribe of money. Second, he told him that it was Socrates’ friends desire to help him. Third, Crito said that Socrates’ survival would benefit the majority. Lastly, Crito emphasized the idea of the importance of posterity to Socrates. Nevertheless, Socrates refused for the fact that none of these four ideas mean the good and upright life that Socrates has been trying to emphasize. According to Socrates, “…the most important thing is not life, but the good life” (Crito 48b, 51). The basis of this good and morally upright life is the good life that would result if Socrates did not disobey the laws of Athens, which now makes up the essence of his argument. Therefore, for Socrates, the alternative to the evil decision to escape is the morally upright decision to stay and obey the laws of Athens in the name of justice. However, the major premise of Socrates’ argument has flaws of its own. It says, “If a citizen actively or tacitly accepts the benefits of the States Laws, then that citizen agrees to abide by all those Laws.” First of all, it is one that proposes a generalization or a non-sequitur. Just because a citizen actively or tacitly accepts the benefits of the State Laws, it does not necessarily mean that a citizen has the duty to abide by these laws. The duty to abide by the law clearly does not depend on its benefits but on possible sanctions if such a duty is not fulfilled. Moreover, as acceptance of the benefits coming from the law is not mandated, so is the duty to abide by the law. Thus, the major premise of Socrates is actually already faulty in logic. Moreover, in defense of the argument, Socrates knew that he was unjustly sentenced to death, but said to Crito, “One must neither repay an injustice nor cause harm to any man, no matter what one suffers because of him” (49c). This is more of Socrates’ virtue of goodness rather than a virtue of justice. If therefore Socrates were to defend the righteousness of this rule, he should have at least thought that this rule was impractical. The reason is that if one must neither repay an injustice, then it means that Athens itself should not have jailed Socrates in the first place since it was not supposed to make him repay an unjust act. Moreover, no one has any right to accuse one another or to have anyone arrested, because, according to Socrates’ rule, “One must neither repay an injustice nor cause harm to any man.” Nevertheless, Socrates was accused and so it should have been clear to him that nobody followed the rule that he was trying to emphasize. The reality is that the laws were harsh and so Socrates should have thought that everything was merely a matter of revenge. Since the Athenian government unjustly accused him, it would simply be better that he should escape in retaliation. Moreover, Socrates defends himself in front of Crito by telling him that a disobedience against the law of the prison, which is the act of escaping, is tantamount to the destruction of the other laws and that of the civic community. According to Socrates, “By attempting this deed [escaping from prison], aren’t you [Socrates] planning to do nothing other than destroy us, the laws, and the civic community, as much as you can?” (50b). However, this is obviously and clearly another non-sequitur because just because one is escaping and therefore showing disrespect toward the law of the court, it does not necessarily mean that one was already against all the laws of the state. Moreover, just because one was escaping from prison does not mean that one was destroying the civic community which the law sought to protect. Perhaps, escaping from the law would disgrace the civic community to a slight degree but in reality, no one among the Athenians in Athens would really actually care about whether Socrates should escape or not. Another reason is that there was no way for Socrates to possibly know the reverberations or consequences of his escape. It was clearly an exaggeration if he said his escape would lead to the crumbling of society as if he was really a very important person in Athens during that time. If he was indeed important, then he would not have been arrested. Furthermore, Socrates emphasized to Crito that the destruction of the laws of the Athenian society as a result of an escape from prison would only be done by a despicable slave. According to Socrates, as a personification of the laws, “By trying to destroy us [laws], you [Socrates] are doing what the most despicable slave would do, trying to run away contrary to the contract and the agreement by which you agreed to be governed by us” (52d). For one to label every prisoner who escaped as a “despicable slave” without even wanting to know his motives for escaping would therefore be an example of narrow-mindedness. One should therefore not just generalize things and label people as this and that unless or until one has known the real reason behind the act. Socrates was acting here as if he condemned anyone who escaped from prison, without actually knowing in the first place whether the imprisonment was even just or not. Thus, with such problems of the major premise, it would therefore be impossible for Socrates to say that a citizen like him must abide by the laws of Athens. Aside from the problems of the major premise, the minor premise has one problem too. The second premise is “Socrates actively accepted the benefits of the States Laws.” Although it could be true that Socrates indeed enjoyed the benefits of the State Laws of the Athenian society, it is clear that Socrates did not benefit at all from the unjust imprisonment, let alone from the drinking of the hemlock. Therefore, since he did not receive such benefits of the States Laws, then it would just be reasonable to think that he had no duty to obey all those Laws. However, perhaps as a martyr and not as a normal citizen of Athens, Socrates accepted the punishment as something to glorify his ideals. However, in this decision of his, he was clearly not being reasonable. Socrates’ conclusion that he must drink the hemlock instead of fleeing Athens on the instructions of Crito, was rather based on an illogical syllogism. First, the major premise assumed the dutiful acceptance of the Laws just because one would get benefit from them, assumed that disobedience to the criminal law was disobedience to all lows, and assumed that one’s violation of the law meant the destruction of the Laws and the civic community. The minor premise was also wrong in saying that Socrates indeed benefited from the law when he was even unjustly proposed. Therefore, Socrates did not have any clear and logical reason to stay in prison and by any means had all the change to escape. Top of Form Bottom of Form Works Cited Crito. n.d.. Web. 6 Dec. 2014. Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“On Socrates argument in The Crito is actually an argument developed by Essay”, n.d.)
On Socrates argument in The Crito is actually an argument developed by Essay. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1670064-on-socrates-argument-in-the-crito-is-actually-an-argument-developed-by-each-phi-101-student-that-explicates-and-evaluates-socrates-argument-in-the-crito-s
(On Socrates Argument in The Crito Is Actually an Argument Developed by Essay)
On Socrates Argument in The Crito Is Actually an Argument Developed by Essay. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1670064-on-socrates-argument-in-the-crito-is-actually-an-argument-developed-by-each-phi-101-student-that-explicates-and-evaluates-socrates-argument-in-the-crito-s.
“On Socrates Argument in The Crito Is Actually an Argument Developed by Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1670064-on-socrates-argument-in-the-crito-is-actually-an-argument-developed-by-each-phi-101-student-that-explicates-and-evaluates-socrates-argument-in-the-crito-s.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Socrates Argument in the Crito

Socrates and His Friendship with Crito

The paper "Socrates and His Friendship with crito" discusses that the actions of crito were totally selfless.... 'crito suspects that people will say that he had cared more for his money than for his friend.... ost scholars, failing to understand the depth of crito's concern, have picked out this argument to dismiss crito as caring only for appearances'.... crito's concern for his friend has however been proved beyond doubt by his subsequent questions to Socrates....
1 Pages (250 words) Research Paper

Socrates' Argument Against Crito

In the paper 'Socrates' Argument Against crito' the author discusses the issue that crito argues from the point of view that he is about to lose a friend, and this is of such importance to him that he is seeking reasons for Socrates to leave rather than face justice.... The author states that each of the points crito makes is systematically shown to be illogical as Socrates argues, and despite crito's sincerity, the strength of Socrates' reasoning is evident....
17 Pages (4250 words) Dissertation

What Is Socrates Argument against Crito

The paper "What Is socrates argument against Crito" states that it is quite essential to state that in Crito, Socrates gets incarcerated in prison, convicted and awaiting the day of his execution, a penalty he faced for corrupting young minds and impiety.... In the dialogue crito written by Plato, an ancient Greek Philosopher, we get introduced to a back and forth conversation between Socrates and his rather affluent friend, crito.... The topic of discussion between crito and Socrates revolved around justice, injustice and what they considered as an appropriate response to injustice....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Philosophical Life and the Socratic Method

socrates could not forsake philosophy to please the government and therefore chose to die.... socrates is widely regarded because of his dedication to a philosophy based on the pursuit of genuine knowledge as opposed to a desire to outshine opponents.... There are many lessons that modern-day philosophers can learn from socrates and his commitment to seek Knowledge through Philosophy.... One important lesson derived from the experience of socrates was devotion to knowledge and truth....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Discussion of Phaedo, Apology and Crito

The paper "Discussion of Phaedo, Apology and crito" states that Socrates believed that the soul has been in existence since our birth.... These are but are not limited to Phaedo, Apology and crito.... In this paper, we will discuss the way in which Phaedo represents the completion of Apology and crito and how do these three dialogues relate to the problems of immortality, death, human freedom, and knowledge.... Aside from Phaedo being the final stage of Socrates' life, it represents the completion of Apology and crito because it encompasses full acceptance of death, the supremacy of reasons, immortality of the soul, and theory of forms....
7 Pages (1750 words) Term Paper

Socrates: Biography, Philosophy, and Objections

From these notes, socrates was.... Being from a rather poor family, socrates must have received basic Greek education besides learning his father's art from an early age.... He is therefore believed to have worked as a It is however not well known how socrates supported himself.... Whereas some contemporaries point out that he got paid for teaching philosophy, others like Plato points out socrates did not accept any payment, citing his poor status as a proof of lack of payment....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Socrates on Unexamined Life

The paper "socrates on Unexamined Life" explains that socrates is remarkably renowned for his claim over whether he was not appropriate living an unexamined life.... The later philosophers after socrates' time had different opinions about the approach to life.... socrates is prominent as one of the elite philosophers of his time for shaping the intellectual and cultural development of the world.... socrates insistence on this claim portrays that human beings are born or called to reflect upon their beliefs, speak to seek out, account for what they do not know and know, live accordance to their views and defend those beliefs that make a meaningful and well-lived life....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Socrates as a Threat to the Athenian Democracy

Since most individuals hate to be challenged in an argument, they tend to take action against those who test them with questions.... "socrates as a Threat to the Athenian Democracy" paper examines deeper insights as to how socrates was considered by the Athenian authorities as a threat to democracy in the city.... socrates went down in history as one of the wisest philosophers ever to exist in the world.... Even in the courtroom, socrates continued to express his discontent with the democratically set institutions, including the judicial system....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us