It deals with the study of the theory of knowledge. It is a field that tries to address various questions that arise in relation to knowledge. For example it tries to address the real definition of knowledge. To…
Download file to see previous pages...
The question of the justification of beliefs also arises in the study of epistemology. The mainly applied theories that are trusted in epistemic justification include reliabilism, foundationalim and coherentism. Epistemology also looks at our perception to the world that we live in and the environment that surrounds us. Perception involves our senses and our attitudes towards what we see and interact with. The process of perception though complex helps us in understanding our environment and how we live in it better. Our interaction with the environment is so important as it determines how friendly we will be or how destructive we will be. This makes it an important field in the study of knowledge. Philosophical skepticism is the question that tries to answer the question whether we even know anything. This paper will address the questions that arise in epistemology and compare the description of the same from different philosophers. The paper is aimed at looking critically at the topic and come up with the best explanation of the theory of knowledge as it pertains to epistemology.
Plato projected the tripartite theory of knowledge which I support in what one should have in order to possess knowledge. In this theory knowledge is analysed and brought out as a justified true belief. The theory proposes that for a person to believe in a certain thing then you must have justified it\. In the justification you end up knowing it and hence the theory holds water. According to Plato, the first condition one should have to have knowledge is belief. Believing in a certain thing is a process that is cultured by excellent, emotional free reasoning and weighing of situations. When you believe in a thing then you know it due to the justification you did regarding the issue. Truth is the second condition to uphold knowledge. Even if a belief is sincere and well justified, if it is not true then it cannot be
...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
(“Knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words - 2”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1639261-knowledge
(Knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 2)
“Knowledge Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 Words - 2”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1639261-knowledge.
This paper is the analysis of the Siemens case study and its knowledge management practices. Two questions are analyzed: (1) knowledge management as human resource management; and (2) the effects of the wrong organizational culture on knowledge sharing. Recommendations to create a perfect knowledge culture are provided.
Name: Tutor: Course: Date: Question 3 Knowledge is a very wide topic that if we started to talk generally about it, it would take several years to evaluate and conclude. Infact, the topic ‘knowledge’ is a recurring topic and for some philosophers, the studying of knowledge as a subject on its own has been in existence for as long as philosophy has been around.
This implies that an organization ought to be knowledgeable about the course of action it should take in order to reach its desired operational heights. In the process of pursuing the set organizational goals and objectives, knowledge management comes in handy.
The fact of the matter lies in the fact, that man cannot attain knowledge if he does not think; this, even as a proposition is considered to be impossible. By thinking of undertaking things, dealing with them, and ultimately being deceived by them, it becomes all the more evident to man that there is a reality that exists.
As stated by Garner in 1987 that good learners have the capacity to understand and gain more knowledge than others. Where as Procedural knowledge is all about performing the tasks or doing the tasks taught to them by declarative knowledge. This type of knowledge helps one individual to build up his strategies and implement them properly.
There is lack of coherence in the field of management and the problem seems to be growing day by day.
According to Sanchez Ron (1997), organization management is a task that involves clear understanding of the organization and its components. Knowledge management describes a set of discipline and systematic actions which are implemented in an organization and which helps in obtaining the greatest value in terms of performance of the organization from the knowledge applied in making decisions.
The purpose for this may however differ from person to person and generation to generation. In the pre-historic era, the mankind had the thirst for knowledge in order to make their daily affairs convenient and satisfy their desire to do the work differently.
Information is an equally vital asset that an organization can possess and these days there is abundance of information flow within the organization. Strategic decisions are taken on the information and information changes by the minute. Knowledge is primarily a problem of capturing, organizing and retrieving information.
But if belief is not sustained by truth one cannot claim to know anything. For example, I may believe that the next prospective customer, whom I visit to make him buy my new insurance policy, will be more compliant than the last.