Benefits of Why Utilitarianism Cannot Be Reconciled with Commonsense - Essay Example

Nearly everyone is in support of freedom of speech as a commonsense agreement. However, this appearance of unanimity quickly disappears if we ask, “What are the parameters of free speech in a host of complex circumstances?” Therefore, practical implications for the acceptance of these rights are highly uncertain.

Utilitarianism explores the pros and cons of action before choosing the better action (Rachels 102). Commonsense might be misguided; therefore, commonsense cannot be trusted. Utilitarianism has contributed greatly in filling up deficiencies of commonsense. Most argue that utilitarianism may lead to conclusions that are contrary to commonsense morality (Rachels 103). Commonsense advocates may also argue that one should not sacrifice some humans for the happiness of others. If we put this into a utilitarian perspective, then we may never realize the peace that we often enjoy. Hence, it is equally “commonsense” that soldiers should sacrifice their lives in a defensive war.

In conclusion, it is a good thing that utilitarianism cannot be reconciled with common sense. Common sense cannot be trusted and maybe misguided. In many of our present circumstances, we are forced to weigh what action is of more benefit to a majority, such as sending soldiers to war-torn zones (sacrificing) so that a majority may enjoy peace.