We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Nobody downloaded yet

Philosophy of Epistemology - Essay Example

Comments (0)
Haack writes that "we need a better understanding of the difference between legitimate mutual support and circularity." What is the understanding that she suggests Does it succeed in avoiding the difficulties of both Foundationalism and Coherentism
What do we know and how do we know it These are the two questions fundamental to epistemological pursuits…
Download full paper

Extract of sample
Philosophy of Epistemology

Download file to see previous pages... It is not the task of this essay to offer a total refutation of the Skeptics' claim, rather to analyze arguments which look at the justification for our beliefs. Two such arguments, which have traditionally been in contest with one another, are Foundationalism and Coherentism. The former claims that there are basic, self-evident beliefs which act as a foundation upon which all other beliefs are built. The latter asserts that all beliefs are justified if and only if they cohere with one another. There are obvious problems with these two modes of thinking, which will form the primary investigation of this essay. A possible solution, as offered by Haack, lies somewhere in the middle and is understandably termed "Foundherentism". The heart of this essay will be in the exploration of Haack's reasoning, but first, a look at the two competing theories from which it stems.
Empirical Foundationalism claims that sense experiences offer the platform upon which we are able to place all other beliefs. They need no further justification and all other beliefs can ultimately be reduced to these basic beliefs. There is a clear initial problem with Foundationalism, in that it appears to rely on an essentially dogmatic approach. It does not seem unreasonable to ask, for example, how someone knows that it is Monday today. Is it because yesterday was Sunday In which case how does one know it was Sunday yesterday Did someone tell them If so, how did they know And so on for an infinite regress. However, it does seem reasonable, from a common-sense perspective to allow the pressed epistemologist sanctuary with his own sense experiences. Indeed, in her article, A Foundherentist Theory of Empirical Justification, Haack remarks that one of the merits of Foundationalism is that "it acknowledges that a person's experience- what he sees, hears etc.- is relevant to how justified he is in his belief about the world" (p.420). It certainly seems to be the case that our senses play a key role in deciding our beliefs about the world.

A further problem, one which is raised by supporters of Coherentism, is that sensory justification alone does not properly address the problem of why those beliefs have come about. There must be, according to Coherentism, some context within which the sensory beliefs make sense. Believing that one can see a computer in front of them is only justified in relation to another set of beliefs about what a computer is. Coherentism essentially allows justification on the merit of the coherence of the belief set within which it falls. It attempts to deny the validity of the regress argument by claiming that justification is a holistic approach. Though it may offer an alternative to the dogmatic approach of Foundationalism, it nevertheless leaves no room for the sense experience of the subject. It is quite plausible that a subject constructs a perfectly coherent set of beliefs which have little or no correspondence with the 'real world' to which it refers. It might, therefore be perfectly allow-able from a Coherentist perspective to hold a set of beliefs which are entirely justifiable but entirely untrue. Furthermore, the 'holistic' approach offered by Coherentists, is seen by its opponents as little more than a euphemism for circularity.

The focus of Foundherentism is the "standards of better or worse evidence, of more or less justified belief" ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment
The variety of goods and services involved necessitates proper arrangement of factors within the retail market to achieve the business aspirations. Retail management calls for departmental organization to bring the customers in to the store/ outlet and fulfilling their buying needs.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
GameStop is committed to delivering user-friendly videos games that meet individual needs to all its customers. Knowledge and its significance Knowledge can be acquired through various means because there exist numerous ways to attain on a certain subject or about something (Nonaka and Nishiguchi, 2001).
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
J. Ayer, 1975). The conception has been advanced and propounded by a large number of writers in a number of theses taking a variety of forms: (1) definitional (a definition of epistemology itself), (2) definitional again (a definition of knowledge), (3) genetic (a thesis about the conditions under which epistemology and all its problems arise), (4) semantic (a thesis about a necessary condition of a question's making sense), (5) historical (theses about the founder of epistemology and the period of its founding), (6) scopic (a thesis about the scope of epistemology), and (7) existential (a thesis about the existence of general skeptics).
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Descartes epistemology
are widely used by modern scientists studying edges of human cognition of universe (e.g. see Deutsch, Penrose or Hawking). Then, positive search of true and objective knowledge about physical fundamentals of nature is impossible without epistemologic ideas, methods and approaches appeared even centuries ago.
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Epistemology versus Ontology in Philosophy
At this point it is imperative to say that this paper pitches epistemology against ontology with an argument for the former. This is due to the fact that the nature of the philosophy demands a field of study like epistemology for research design. In the course of this paper, the various aspects like positivism and interpretivism as well as subjective and objective bent of mind will be discussed with a focus on the elements of the research area.
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay
Pragmatism and Feminist Epistemology
This thought took its birth in the 19th century in United States. William James is regarded as the man who came up with this theory while the man himself insists that the primary originator of this philosophy was Charles Sanders Peirce, about 3 decades before it was hailed as James's originality.
3 Pages(750 words)Essay
What is Epistemology
In searching truth several theories were defined. Each of them has special approach to the question of knowledge acquisition, to the concepts of truth, belief, reliability of statements and how assumptions turn into proved statements we believe in. The given
8 Pages(2000 words)Essay
The study entails the fact on object’s existence, why they exist, the factor that cause their occurrence and the time of occurrence. An example is the human brain. Its existence poses different questions on how it works. Metaphysics seeks to explain
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
Philosophy is considerably vast and covers various fields ranging from metaphysics, language, ethics, Epistemology, ontology, management, logic and politics. Any field or discipline has a philosophical orientation developed
2 Pages(500 words)Essay
Epistemology is concerned regarding the problems involved in the formation and distribution of knowledge in specific parts of the Inquisition. There are many different types of knowledge; having knowledge regarding a specific person, having knowledge regarding how to do a specific thing and having knowledge about a city or a particular area.
4 Pages(1000 words)Essay
Let us find you another Essay on topic Philosophy of Epistemology for FREE!
Contact us:
Contact Us Now
FREE Mobile Apps:
  • About StudentShare
  • Testimonials
  • FAQ
  • Blog
  • Free Essays
  • New Essays
  • Essays
  • The Newest Essay Topics
  • Index samples by all dates
Join us:
Contact Us