StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Why Heidegger Is One of the Prominent Philosophers - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The paper "Why Heidegger Is One of the Prominent Philosophers?" argues that although the thinker's work is controversial, he has made immense contributions in different areas including, phenomenology, existentialism, hermeneutics, political theory, psychology, theology, and postmodernism…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER95.3% of users find it useful
Why Heidegger Is One of the Prominent Philosophers
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Why Heidegger Is One of the Prominent Philosophers"

INTRODUCTION Heidegger is considered to be among the prominent philosophers of 20th century, although his work is considered to be controversial, much because he has evolved certain new concepts and perspectives which were previously beyond imagination. He has made immense contribution towards in different areas including, phenomenology, existentialism, hermeneutics, political theory, psychology, theology, and postmodernism. He made significant contribution for the development of ontology, i.e. study of being. He practiced phenomenological analysis of human existence in an attempt to access being, with reference to the temporal and historical character. He also discussed the nihilism of modern technology, and its generated society and tried to correlate the thoughts and perspectives of the western philosophical tradition with the question of being. DISCUSSION: Ready-to-Hand & Present-at-Hand Heidegger has approved the explanation with regard to philosophy as 'its own time comprehended in thought'; the same thought has been delivered by the historians. According to Heidegger, the history of philosophy was to be considered as Western civilization's ever-deepening forgetfulness or oblivion of being, and he disapproved the belief that supported progressive self-realization of spirit version of history f philosophy. Heidegger was also supportive of the notion that Eastern intellectual thoughts can be of support towards technological understanding of being. Heidegger once commented that, 'I am convinced that a change can only be prepared from the same place in the world where the modern technological world originated. It cannot come about by the adoption of Zen Buddhism or other Eastern experiences of the world. The help of the European tradition and a new appropriation of that tradition are needed for a change in thinking. Thinking will only be transformed by a thinking that has the same origin and destiny. The technological world must be superseded in the Hegelian sense, not removed, superseded, but not by human beings alone'(G. Neske, 1990). Heideggar's philosophy has much in similar with the philosophy proposed by Edmund Husserl. Heidegger was much impressed by the article of Husserl on Logical Investigations. Heidegger acknowledged that Husserl's phenomenology produced significant impact on his personal work. Phenomenology is with reference to the science of consciousness and the related objects. The Cartesian tradition has been foundation for phenomenology, Husserl is of the opinion that one can reach the phenomenological attitude, based on the detail analysis of the content of consciousness, from natural attitude, based on actual world and related affairs by the application of methodological procedure. Freedom from prejudice and achievement of purity is possible through phenomenological reduction. Heidegger believes that phenomenology is based on separate analysis of consciousness. DASEIN: Ready-to-Hand & Present-at-Hand Being and Time is supportive of Husserlian phenomenology, and Heidegger has tried to explore the different modes of the existence of the beings, and the experience of its encounter. He analyzed the concept of being in a detailed manner, and referred to the daily life as utensils, or in particular mood of anxiety, and has further revealed the identity of Dasein, and terms it to be particular kind of being. Heidegger has denied the concept with reference to the constitution of the original on the basis of pure consciousness, rather is of the opinion that Dasein in its being is the core of philosophy. Heidegger has forwarded many thoughts which need to be answered. In his letter to Husserl he asked, "What is the mode of being of that being in which the world constitutes itself'" he has stressed over the need to evaluate the constitution supportive of the existence of Dasein, and if certain mysteries with reference to Dasein are unanswered, it will have an impact on the being in general. He wrote to Husserl that, "universal problem of being refers to that which constitutes and to that which is constituted." Heidegger has tried to conceive phenomenology in a broad manner, with an etymological approach. Heidegger has applied the term phenomenology for the designation of the method, which is in contradiction Husserl, who has considered phenomenology to be the basis for the philosophy. Heidegger has termed phenomenology as an exercise of ontology. According to him, "Phenonenology is the way of access to what is to become the theme of ontology" (Carol. 2005). Phenomenological method has to be applied to secure the understanding of being. The access to being is indirect because it is considered to be being of a being, and is accessible through existing entity therefore phenomenological reduction is important. Heidegger considered Dasein to be source through which normal being is accessible. We observe that Heidegger has employed Husserlian phenomenological reduction in a different manner. Heideggar's philosophy is not based on consciousness, and phenomenological or theoretical attitude of consciousness is secondary mode for the analysis of Dasein's being. Heidegger and Husserl share similar opinion with reference to the transcendental constitution of the world, and its failure to explore through naturalistic or physical explanations. Heidegger has termed phenomenology as method to explore being, Being and Time philosophy is considered to be phenomenological ontology which is complementary and refuse the analysis of Dasein. HUMAN MIND: Ready-to-Hand & Present-at-Hand According to Aristotle the major feature for differentiating between natural entities with artifacts has been movement. Heidegger has contradicted the idea, and is of the opinion that entities inherit auto-disclosive phenomena. Heidegger has observed that these entities have their origin from unknown ness into known ness, 'or from distortion into clarity, or from forgotten ness into remembrance', and has termed as possible sources for the existence of the entity' (Carol. 2005). All of these are modes of appropriation, ways an entity comes into presence. Thus, to see an entity as disclosed is to see it as kinetic. And that means not only seeing the present entity but also indeed priory co-seeing the being of the entity, its pres-ab-sentiality'. Heidegger has evolved relationship between the self-disclosive structure of human being and the auto-disclosive structure of entities, and has stressed that former supports the latter. 'Human being is present to itself, that is, is the openness of Dasein only by being appropriated into its own self-absence. But the openness is the arena in which entities show up as this or that, i.e., in their being. The openness is given by the human being's kinetic self-absence; and that absence in turns allow for the finite presence of entities as this or that'. He further elaborated, 'Being itself recedes, but, as this recess, being is precisely the pull that claims human being's being as the place of being's own arrival, 'the disclosure of entities has a privative dimension that is registered in human being's transcendence in such a way as to allow the disclosure of entities'' (Nietzsche, pp. 368). Dasein has German origin, and means life or existence. Heidegger has termed Dasein more than just a normal human being; in his opinion Dasein is source for the disclosure of being. Heidegger philosophy is based on many mysterious thoughts, with reference to the interpretation of Dasein. Heidegger is of the opinion that Dasein has deepened meaning, and refuted the universal concept of the Dasein. Heidegger's change in approach towards Dasein is still in connection with the questions with reference to Being and Time. Heidegger has attempted to relate and explore the concept of being. 'The ontological difference, the distinction between being and beings, is fundamental for Heidegger. The forgetfulness of being which, according to him, occurs in the course of western philosophy amounts to the oblivion of this distinction' (John, 1994) . Heidegger was in quest to explore the possible experience of the being of entities, and avoided the discussion with reference to the being-of-entities. Heidegger expressed his interest to know more about the experience of all modes of being, the source which emits the being of entities to human experience, ignoring the characteristics of the being based on ontological or theological aspects. (Graham, 2002) Heidegger solved the puzzle through phenomenological and kinetic approach. The phenomenological transformation is based on the exposure of the meaningful disclosure to human experience. Heidegger has favored the tradition which discusses the being of entities with reference to the human experience. He claimed that, 'metaphysics failed to see whatever it is that gives or dispenses the being of entities, that being is intrinsically kinetic, i.e., an ontological movement of disclosure that is bound up with the ontological movement of human being itself' (John, 1994). There is a relationship between the self-disclosive structure of human being and the auto-disclosive structure of entities. According to Heidegger, 'human being is present to itself', explains that openness of Dasein. 'The openness of Dasein is the arena in which entities show up as this or that, i.e. in their being. The openness is given by the human being's kinetic self-absence; and that absence in turns allow for the finite presence of entities as this or that' (Thomas, 1984). Entity's movement into appearance is marked as appropriation process. The philosophy of Heidegger has highlighted that Plato's introduced bi-dimensionality of appropriation i.e. movement and appearance was ignored, and therefore only movement was considered fundamental base. 'The eidos loses its reference to the entity's emergence into disclosure and becomes instead that-as-which an entity presents itself for possible intellectual viewing by human being' (Thomas, 1984). According to Heidegger, the understanding of truth is not only based on the pres-ab-sential disclosure of entities, rather it is based on the intellectual correspondence shared between human being and the entities within their disclosed present ness. 'As privative presence drop out of the picture, any hope of grasping the corresponding kinetic nature of human being is lost. The being of entities is interpreted as stable disclosed ness, and human being is understood as the one who renders entities meaningfully present in that stable appearance. And since only what is unmoving and eternal is, truly stable, only the eternal shows itself as true being. Temporal, moving entities are relegated to the status of me on, not-really-in-being' (Thomas, 1984). REFERENCES 1. Thomas Sheehan. Heidegger's Philosophy of Mind. Contemporary Philosophy: A New Survey. Philosophy of Mind, Vol. IV. 1984. 2. Graham Harman. Tool-Being: Heidegger and the Metaphysics of Objects. Black Well Publishers. 2002. pp. 123. 3. John L. Protevi. Time and Exteriority: Aristotle, Heidegger, Derrida. Bucknell University Press. 1994. pp. 120 4. Carol J. White, Mark Ralkowski. Time and Death: Heidegger's Analysis of Finitude. Prentice Hall. 2005. pp. 24. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Heidegger's distinction between the ready-to-hand and the Essay”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1511961-heideggers-distinction-between-the-ready-to-hand-and-the-present-to-hand
(Heidegger'S Distinction Between the Ready-to-Hand and the Essay)
https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1511961-heideggers-distinction-between-the-ready-to-hand-and-the-present-to-hand.
“Heidegger'S Distinction Between the Ready-to-Hand and the Essay”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1511961-heideggers-distinction-between-the-ready-to-hand-and-the-present-to-hand.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Why Heidegger Is One of the Prominent Philosophers

Paul Tillich and His Theology

one of his duties was to bury the dead and soon the young chaplain found himself spending more time digging graves than fulfilling his direct duties (Henderson, 1986).... Paul Tillich, the most prominent and prolific Protestant theologian and philosopher of the last century, played the key role in shaping the philosophy of Christian existentialism....
6 Pages (1500 words) Book Report/Review

Are the Americans Really Free

On the one hand, we live in a democratic society with a powerful Constitution, and we are free to choose political and religious beliefs.... The reason why we have to talk about Foucault's work is that the philosopher was the one who gave new birth to the term "panopticon" that was first used by Jeremy Bentham in the 18th century to describe a prison allowing to constantly observe the prisoners, and which is more, ever since Foucault's book was released, the modern society began to be regarded as "panoptic" by some researchers....
11 Pages (2750 words) Coursework

Philosophy of Martin Heidegger

The German philosopher Martin Heidegger is considered to be among the prominent philosophers of the 20th century.... one orient or directs one's emotions towards an object.... Husserl is of the opinion that one can reach the phenomenological attitude, based on the detailed analysis of the content of consciousness, from natural attitude, based on the actual world and related affairs by the application of the methodological procedure....
8 Pages (2000 words) Article

Fear is Inauthentic Anxiety

heidegger view on fear details that, fear caries with the division between what is feared and the fearing itself.... The paper "Fear is Inauthentic Anxiety" tells us about experience of anxiety.... The statement that, 'fear is inauthentic anxiety' highlights that anxiety is a primordial phenomenon that devolves into fear the moment it relates to an object....
8 Pages (2000 words) Term Paper

What Are the Main Differences between the Ideas of the Early and the Later Wittgenstein

The paper "What Are the Main Differences between the Ideas of the Early and the Later Wittgenstein" discusses that in his later works heidegger showed a significant shift of focus from his earlier thoughts.... It is quite essential that in his later work, heidegger largely abandoned the account of 'dasein' as a pragmatic, engaged, worldly agent, and instead discussed other elements necessary to an understanding of being, notably language, the earth as the almost ineffable foundation of the world and the presence of the gods....
8 Pages (2000 words) Assignment

Existentialism: The Second Sex

bull; Existence precedes essence: Sartre was the first one to use this phrase.... The research paper 'Existentialism: The Second Sex' looks at existentialism, which is a belief in 'existence precedes essence'.... The established history of the term dates back to the nineteenth century, though it had forebears in the earlier times also....
24 Pages (6000 words) Dissertation

Technology and Its Philosophy

However different philosophers differ greatly from each other in their primary perspectives, opinions, and point of view, but it still remains a very prominent attribute and feature of philosophy that the search for truth is primary.... The author of the "Technology and Its Philosophy" paper argues that the various technologies that the world has developed have their philosophical repercussions as they threaten the security and privacy of people, and take them into a realm of virtual existence....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Power between the Noble Man and the Slave

The noble people have more power compared to the slaves because most of them are given prominent positions in organizations or owns the most valuable properties which they assign the slaves to take care of this they have the ability to dictate to their juniors what to do.... The amount of power one has depends on the ability to use the authority that one has and the skills that one has.... Although power is expected to have common impacts to the whole group that it is aimed to govern, it is conceived differently by various individuals depending on the level of standard of living which also brings about the type of power that one has; a nobleman has different powers compared to a slave....
10 Pages (2500 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us