Searle's Theory - Essay Example

This action occurs in a perfect manner such that the people outside the room begin to believe that actually the person understands Chinese. The same experiment is performed by a computer that applies syntax program to manipulate Chinese Language despite the fact that the computer may not comprehend the language. The Theory in regard to Syntax Manipulation To begin with, Searle does not show anywhere in his theory that Syntax manipulation does not involve any form of thinking nor does he suggest anywhere that Syntax manipulation entails thinking.

However, a clear conclusion that can be derived from his argument is that the fact that a computer can manipulate certain functions to produce desired results is not a reason to conclude that it can understand certain issues. Personal Opinion in relation to Searle’s Theory Taking a careful analysis of Searle’s argument, it is quite evident that his argument is correct. To begin with, any computerized technology utilized in the contemporary generation is made and designed and by man. This entails that any application in the computer, is designed in a manner that is satisfy specific human needs.

Moreover, the manner by, which this computers satisfy or perform their functions is designed and guided by human efforts meaning all the information contained in any computer program emanates from human brain, basically human intellect. The fact that all the information contained in a computer emanates from human mind is evidence that computers are generally designed to process already existing information. However, the speed at, which they process this information is what exhibits a difference with humans.

Humans have the knowledge, but their levels of information processing are relatively slower and vary from one to another. Therefore, Searle’s argument those computers are only capable of manipulating syntax information, but cannot understand certain information is correct. Another reason that may lead to a conclusion that Searle’s argument is correct is the fact that computers cannot process information without the guidance of human. Computerized gadgets i.e. calculators require human efforts to provide desired results.

Human has to feed in information in the computer in order to get results. In this process, the results provided are performed by already stored programs, basically providing data that has already recorded. This is a great evidence indicating that computers do not understand information i.e. language but rather provides information in regard to already stored data that are manipulated through a syntax process. Issues that are not exhibited in Searle’s Argument Searle’s presents a very imperative argument that requires critical thinking.

In his argument, he does not support it by indicating the actual difference that occurs between information processed by humans and computers. He does not recognize the fact that computers have a higher information processing speed as compared to human beings. Additionally, he does not recognize the fact that information provided by computers is usually generated from already stored data that are basically manipulated through syntax processes. These are substantial arguments that he should have added to back-up his theory.

Additionally, Searle should also argue that computers a