Business Ethics - Assignment Example

This is in spite of the fact that Hooters lawyer, Patricia Casey, had explained in earlier court preceding, and evoked similar exceptions in the 1964 Civil Rights Act, that Hooters used the sex appeal of the flimsily dressed female servers to attract and entertain customers (Nations Restaurant News, 1995). It is to be noted that Playboy Clubs had repeatedly cited the latter act successfully in their numerous court charges for similar hiring discrimination charges. Critics, therefore, wonder what EEOC was really up to in the Hooters’ case, and hold the opinion that the commission was only using Civil Rights laws to protect out-of-work men from hiring discriminations (Nations Restaurant News, 1995).

The EEOC has apparently gone to an extent of advising Hooters to incorporate a scholarly fund to help enhance the skills, education and employment opportunities of males. To this demand, Bureaucracy activist James Bovard wonders what EEOC expected Hooters to train the male employees in; “…how to flirt with burly construction workers without getting punched in the nose?" (Nations Restaurant News, 1995) Most importantly, the EEOC politically correct stand on the Hooters’ case attracts the following questions: a.

Does anti-discrimination go too far in disallowing a business concept? Business ideas come in as a result of innovation and creativity. Given that human beings have different capacities to these, no one should be discriminated against, especially when their product of creativity seems to pay off and expand. Hooters of America incorporation is a unique business idea that seeks to provide predominantly entertainment, diversion and amusement based on the sex appeal of the Hooters Girls as stated by the hooters lawyer Patricia Casey (Nations Restaurant News, 1995).

Therefore the anti-discrimination law by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is absolutely wrong, especially because their accusations of the Hooters were solely based on nothing but the implementation of their great business idea. However, all businesses invariably face moral and ethical issues during operation and Hooters is no exception. The company is apparently not promoting itself as an “equal opportunity employer” buy employing only beautiful young ladies and discriminating against not so beautiful ladies and men.

These are no doubt legitimate moral issues that the hooters need to address within their business ethics and draw clear lines on how to deal with this issue. It is vital to appreciate that as we seek the freedom to implement great ideas, we must abide by the law and should uphold all business morals and have clear business ethics in place to deal with moral issues that may come up from time to time. The EEOC asked the hooters to give 40% of their job openings to male servers as a way to deal with gender discrimination (Nations Restaurant News, 1995).

The question however is, how about the issue of not hiring the not so good looking women and men? Should we then argue that all men and women are attractive in the eyes of their beholders? This remains a big dilemma. b. Would you consider being a hooters boy or not? I see no problem in being a hooters b