Nobody downloaded yet

What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant - Essay Example

Comments (0) Cite this document
Immanuel Kant considers old philosophical problems using new methods. Kant defends morality from reduction to self-interest, empirical fact, or feelings. Rather, he bases his supreme moral principle on reason…
Download full paperFile format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94% of users find it useful
What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant
Read TextPreview

Extract of sample "What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant"

Download file to see previous pages He goes on to observe that only good will is good sans qualification. Good will is always good in itself and not just for the things that it produces. Will is good if will comes from duty, as well as other moral motives, which do not simply conform to duty. For instance, grocers who give the right change because of fairness, rather than from the fear of being caught, do so from good will. The reasoning goal is not in producing happiness but rather producing will that can be seen to be good in it. The satisfaction of man’s desires, which is happiness, is not determinate enough to use as a workable guide. Good will cannot act as the complete and sole good, although it is the worthy condition of being happy and the highest good. Complete good can only be goodwill combined with happiness. Rationality possesses its own laws of objectiveness. Because man is rational only partially, he experiences the various laws as constraints and imperatives that he is required to follow. These imperatives are grounded on the premise that is valid for all rational beings as such. These imperatives, according to Kant, could be hypothetical, i.e. if one wants to get to end E, then he should do A, or categorical, which is he ought to perform A. Ethics that are based on imperatives that are hypothetical are heteronymous because they involve following laws set by another. Categorical imperatives are hard to understand, although their content is clear. The basic imperative of category states that man acts on principle and these principles can be willed on everybody (Laursen 21). Ethics and morals are autonomous if they are based on categorical imperatives because man follows their own laws. Kant’s supreme moral principle is the universal law formula, which contends that man should act on a maxim that they follow to be used as a universal law (Laursen 23). Kant continues by applying his formula to two duties that are perfect and exception-less. These are not making promises with deceit and not committing suicide, as well as two imperfect duties, which to help those who have needs and development of one’s talents. These ideas can be expressed more loosely in two ways. Firstly, it is to treat all humanity, both you and others, not as a means only, but also as an end in itself (Laursen 23). Secondly, man should act as if one’s action maxim would be turned into nature’s universal law. Kant also connects freedom with morality. According to him, to be free means to follow one’s own principles of rationality rather than following our desires only. This means that one should follow their own legislation and act on maxims that they would follow, rather than the universal laws (Laursen 24). Therefore, freedom is morality. So morality and freedom, ultimately, are the same mystery. It is not possible to explain what free will is. It is only possible to assume what it is and reject all objections against it. Man knows that he/she is free through knowledge of his/her duties. Since probably an individual could have acted in a different way, then one is free. In order for man to recognize himself as free, he needs to see himself as being a member to two worlds. These worlds are a higher intelligible world and a sensible world. Acting in a moral way, therefore, has a supreme moral worth since through it, one participates in an existence of a higher order. This can be perceived as the foundation of human dignity as an end to itself (Laursen 24). Hume, on the other hand, contends that reason and moral sense combine to make our moral judgments. He says that moral sense is essential in making a distinction between virtue and vice, ...Download file to see next pagesRead More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
(“What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant Essay”, n.d.)
What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant Essay. Retrieved from
(What Are the Ultimate Principles of Morals for Both Hume and Kant Essay)
What Are the Ultimate Principles of Morals for Both Hume and Kant Essay.
“What Are the Ultimate Principles of Morals for Both Hume and Kant Essay”, n.d.
  • Cited: 0 times
Comments (0)
Click to create a comment or rate a document

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant

Ethics (David Hume and Kant)

...which we feel self dignity (449, 454). In this way, Kant has rescued moral principles from the fluctuations of human nature and put them as universals. Hume has said also that “ultimate ends of human actions can never, in any case, be accounted for by reason, but recommend themselves entirely to the sentiments and affections of mankind, without any dependence on the intellectual faculties” (134). But as Kant has observed that it is the “incentives” given for good action and the punishment given for bad action that prompt humans to “act rightly” (67). And these incentives and punishments are based on the moral...
7 Pages(1750 words)Essay

The Metaphysics of Morals by Emmanual Kant

...; and it lays this down as a postulate which is not capable of further proof. As the object in view is not to teach virtue, but to explain what right is, thus far the law of right, as thus laid down, may not and should not be represented as a motive-principle of action.” The last chapter deals with the concept of free will amongst individuals, which implies that a will is a free will if and only it fulfills all standards of morality. According to Kant, a human being is free in its true sense when it is free to act without any pressure and it has the endurance to undergo moral actions. In this regard, it will be very insightful to include an excerpt from the spark notes...
24 Pages(6000 words)Essay

Kant and Hume on Morality

...?Kant and Hume on Morality Kant and Hume are both considered great philosophers. However, their points of view differ on most things. Morality is onesuch issue too. Kant subscribes to reason as the prime cause behind morality while Hume insists on emotion being the reason behind morality. Kant’s “Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals” is an attempt in this direction while Hume’s “An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals” justifies his views. Both pieces of work are contrasted below. Kant’s concepts are discussed first followed by Hume’s concepts. Later on these views are critically analysed to establish which point of view is better. Kant Kant argues for an a priori basis for morality in his work. The central concept... is the...
5 Pages(1250 words)Essay


...Natural Religion”. Following is a piece from that literature: “an eternal inherent principle of order to the world” In this piece of conversation Hume is arguing on the principle of religion and the ideology propagated by the religious texts and other literature. He says that the religion has been propounded as the order to the world. The religious people always based their theory tp be the world of God and Hume is questioning the same theory by making a sarcastic point with effect that all this is a theory in nature and nothing else. The reality is something according to Hume. To this point Philo says that religion is the ultimate truth...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Kant, Fundamental Principles

...severity of punishments, especially capital punishment. Then read pages 192-224 of the Primis Packet (for both Assignments 8 and 9). This is the powerful novella by the American Herman Melville (though most of the main characters in it are British), and we read it as an extended, and unforgettable, example of Kant's Deontology at work. 1. On Kant's view society not only has the (a)_____ to punish criminals but also the (b)_____ because (c)_____ demands that criminals pay for their deeds. A. right B. responsibility C. morality 2. Kant's principle of retaliation, which assigns both the quality and quantity of a just...
3 Pages(750 words)Essay

Practical Anthropology and Moral Philosophy Distinction

...’ limitations are what he referred to as practical moral anthropology. Hume on the other hand believes in the empirical, naturalistic and the experimental nature of morals. He disputes the priori principles of Kant. Therefore, in analyzing Hume through Kant, one can only focus on the moral anthropology. Here, between Kant’s moral anthropology and Hume’s principles of morals, there are similarities as both are subject to the human agents’ limitations that they conjure in order to reach a certain end. In this discussion, the most convincing perspective is that adopted by Kant. While acknowledging the theories of Hume under moral anthropology, he goes further to introduce a priori principle that acknowledges a part of human morals... and...
6 Pages(1500 words)Essay

Plato Euthyphro, Aristotle, Hobbes, Hume, Kant

...if we believe it to be wrong. 5. Hume explains that since human action is driven by morals rather than reason, we won’t be able to tell the difference between what ought to be and what is really happening. I think one of the counterexamples is using reason to understand and to justify what should have happened from what is really happening. 1. Kant explains that good will is not and will never result to something evil as it is done devoid of personal intentions. But I believe that there is still some personal interest in good will, such as feeling good about helping another. 2. Happiness can result to boldness and arrogance since the individual finds satisfaction in what he has done or...
6 Pages(1500 words)Assignment


...happiness for the greatest number of people is right. There is a possibility that an individual can receive utility from the wrong action. Lastly, it is not true that all persons have bodies since we do not know whether the person God has a body. Besides, we never know if a person is an idea, imagination or a thought. How Counterexamples Contribute to Hume Argument Hume proposes that all objects of human reasoning or inquiry are either ideas or matter of facts. Relations of ideas are mostly mathematical verities, and hence irrefutable without making contradictions. Moreover, he maintained that ideas are discoverable by thoughts without necessarily depending on experience. On the other hand, matters of...
1 Pages(250 words)Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.

Let us find you another Essay on topic What are the ultimate principles of morals for both Hume and Kant for FREE!

Contact Us