Phil Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1468938-phil
Phil Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1468938-phil.
Based on Bacon’s idea we could substantially deduce the thought that initiating experiments is a must in order to learn something more about nature’s secret. In fact, we learned more about genetic engineering and its associated human benefits for instance because scientists were able to initiate studies or experiments and are still in the continuing process of doing them, which according to Bacon’s discourse are form or means of disturbing or annoying nature just to unearth potential deeper learning or understanding about it.
Descartes’ assertion on the other hand is focused on separating from the natural world and so to make precise measurement possible. It is about modifying the physical processes from one system of constraints to another (Descartes and Gaukroger 8). Just like Bacon, Descartes could still be referring to the inclusion of the experimental process in order to make certain of nature’s essential hidden information. It is only this way that humans would be able to come up with a definite or precise explanation of how everything is going on in the physical world.
What is the goal of Bacon’s and Descartes’ new science? Articulate the goal itself, and why it is necessary human goal. Articulate how the goal shapes the new way of inquiry and its new starting point.
The goal of Bacon’s and Descartes’ new science is to uncover the secret of nature. For them, this is a necessary human goal because it will lead to the betterment of life. The advancement of technology for instance has been made possible through consistent and existing scientific inquiry. Various technologies are able to give life’s comfort and even improvement of the humans’ way of living and this is because of the continuing quest to inquire about the world and uncover the very secret that every human being should understand. Concerning this goal, Bacon and Descartes might be implying the fact that we need to be more aggressive with our inquiry in order to promote the remarkable way of understanding nature and even extend our power and dominion over the universe.
Today, the new way of inquiry might have a strong relevance with the ideas of Bacon and Descartes. As human technology advances, many things that are kept hidden before us from the past are momentarily revealed right before our eyes today. Science and technology are combined together in order to promote more dynamic output in the process of scientific inquiry. Research designs are formulated from time to time just to be able to acquire relevant information that would make sense prior to acquiring the appropriate inference. In other words, though the basic foundation implied from the ideas of Bacon and Descartes remains, what is very obvious is the fact that there are dynamic improvements or changes in the inquiry and its new starting point is revealed through the allocation of existing information and developed technologies.
For Locke, what is the state of nature? How are liberty, equality, and law found in the state of nature? In what way does Locke expect his reader to find his natural law teaching in this state “a strong doctrine”?
Locke’s idea of the state of nature is concerned with men who can reach order without being controlled by someone else. It is therefore a state of perfect freedom and equality, as everyone lives together according to reason under the law of nature (McDowell 146).
Under Locke’s state of nature, everyone, therefore, has the liberty to exercise their own will. However, this could also mean that somebody’s liberty ends when someone else’s freedom begins. To conserve the state of nature especially in individual cases, humans have to undergo a social contract that can be established by the emancipation of law, as the ultimate way to protect life, freedom, and property. The emancipation of social contract, which could be in a form of law is the ultimate way to preserve the opportunity of everyone to exercise freedom. This means that if someone would violate someone’s freedom, the law would be able to determine the appropriate sanctions for whatever violation involved.
Locke is simply trying to tell us that our creation of society is a perfect manifestation that we are living under the state of nature and live powerfully in its doctrine.